CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology 2023; 06(03): 227-237
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1764402
Review Article

Imaging Features of Rare Hepatic Tumors

Raghunandan Vikram
1   Abdominal Imaging Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
Achal Sarna
1   Abdominal Imaging Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
,
1   Abdominal Imaging Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Hepatic lesions are commonly encountered in radiology practice. Lesions with classic imaging findings such as hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, hemangiomas, focal nodular hyperplasia, and adenomas are well described in literature and easily diagnosed by most experienced radiologists. In the appropriate context, metastases, which are one of the most common lesions encountered by radiologists who practice in predominantly cancer care settings, are also easily diagnosed. However, one may encounter rarer neoplasms which may be challenging to diagnose and manage. Often, these lesions have overlapping imaging features with those of the common lesions mentioned above. Diagnosis of these rarer tumors would require not only interpreting the images in the context of patient's demographics and clinical presentation but also recognizing the unique imaging features of these tumors. The literature is sparse in describing the radiological appearances of these tumors. Diagnosis based solely on imaging criteria is not advised in these instances. Histological confirmation or other prudent follow-up strategies are necessary for confirmation of imaging findings and interpretation. In this article, we will describe known imaging features of a few rarer primary malignant and benign neoplasms in the liver.



Publication History

Article published online:
17 April 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Darbari A, Sabin KM, Shapiro CN, Schwarz KB. Epidemiology of primary hepatic malignancies in U.S. children. Hepatology 2003; 38 (03) 560-566
  • 2 Kahla JA, Siegel DA, Dai S. et al. Incidence and 5-year survival of children and adolescents with hepatoblastoma in the United States. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69 (10) e29763
  • 3 Trobaugh-Lotrario AD, López-Terrada D, Li P, Feusner JH. Hepatoblastoma in patients with molecularly proven familial adenomatous polyposis: clinical characteristics and rationale for surveillance screening. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65 (08) e27103
  • 4 McArthur JW, Toll GD, Russfield AB, Reiss AM, Quinby WC, Baker WH. Sexual precocity attributable to ectopic gonadotropin secretion by hepatoblastoma. Am J Med 1973; 54 (03) 390-403
  • 5 Grunewald TG, von Luettichau I, Welsch U. et al. First report of ectopic ACTH syndrome and PTHrP-induced hypercalcemia due to a hepatoblastoma in a child. Eur J Endocrinol 2010; 162 (04) 813-818
  • 6 Raney B. Hepatoblastoma in children: a review. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1997; 19 (05) 418-422
  • 7 McCarville MB, Roebuck DJ. Diagnosis and staging of hepatoblastoma: imaging aspects. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 59 (05) 793-799
  • 8 Towbin AJ, Meyers RL, Woodley H. et al. 2017 PRETEXT: radiologic staging system for primary hepatic malignancies of childhood revised for the Paediatric Hepatic International Tumour Trial (PHITT). Pediatr Radiol 2018; 48 (04) 536-554
  • 9 Meyers RL, Czauderna P, Otte JB. Surgical treatment of hepatoblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 59 (05) 800-808
  • 10 Suriawinata AA, Thung SN. Malignant liver tumors. Clin Liver Dis 2002; 6 (02) 527-554, ix ix.
  • 11 Kim JR, Lee KB, Kwon W, Kim E, Kim SW, Jang JY. Comparison of the clinicopathologic characteristics of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct according to morphological and anatomical classifications. J Korean Med Sci 2018; 33 (42) e266
  • 12 Sherman M. Vinyl chloride and the liver. J Hepatol 2009; 51 (06) 1074-1081
  • 13 Groeschl RT, Miura JT, Oshima K, Gamblin TC, Turaga KK. Does histology predict outcome for malignant vascular tumors of the liver?. J Surg Oncol 2014; 109 (05) 483-486
  • 14 Antonescu C. Malignant vascular tumors–an update. Mod Pathol 2014; 27 (Suppl. 01) S30-S38
  • 15 Koyama T, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Kuo MS, Notohara K, Burgart LJ. Primary hepatic angiosarcoma: findings at CT and MR imaging. Radiology 2002; 222 (03) 667-673
  • 16 Makhlouf HR, Ishak KG, Goodman ZD. Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver: a clinicopathologic study of 137 cases. Cancer 1999; 85 (03) 562-582
  • 17 Mehrabi A, Kashfi A, Fonouni H. et al. Primary malignant hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: a comprehensive review of the literature with emphasis on the surgical therapy. Cancer 2006; 107 (09) 2108-2121
  • 18 Ganeshan D, Pickhardt PJ, Morani AC. et al. Hepatic hemangioendothelioma: CT, MR, and FDG-PET-CT in 67 patients-a bi-institutional comprehensive cancer center review. Eur Radiol 2020; 30 (05) 2435-2442
  • 19 Zhou L, Cui MY, Xiong J. et al. Spectrum of appearances on CT and MRI of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. BMC Gastroenterol 2015; 15: 69
  • 20 Alomari AI. The lollipop sign: a new cross-sectional sign of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. Eur J Radiol 2006; 59 (03) 460-464
  • 21 Liu X, Yu H, Zhang Z. et al. MRI appearances of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: a retrospective study of 57 patients. Insights Imaging 2022; 13 (01) 65
  • 22 Hornick JL, Fletcher CD. PEComa: what do we know so far?. Histopathology 2006; 48 (01) 75-82
  • 23 Cai PQ, Wu YP, Xie CM, Zhang WD, Han R, Wu PH. Hepatic angiomyolipoma: CT and MR imaging findings with clinical-pathologic comparison. Abdom Imaging 2013; 38 (03) 482-489
  • 24 Nonomura A, Enomoto Y, Takeda M, Takano M, Morita K, Kasai T. Angiomyolipoma of the liver: a reappraisal of morphological features and delineation of new characteristic histological features from the clinicopathological findings of 55 tumours in 47 patients. Histopathology 2012; 61 (05) 863-880
  • 25 Yang X, Li A, Wu M. Hepatic angiomyolipoma: clinical, imaging and pathological features in 178 cases. Med Oncol 2013; 30 (01) 416
  • 26 Arnaoutakis DJ, Kim Y, Pulitano C. et al. Management of biliary cystic tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of a rare liver tumor. Ann Surg 2015; 261 (02) 361-367
  • 27 Soares KC, Arnaoutakis DJ, Kamel I. et al. Cystic neoplasms of the liver: biliary cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 218 (01) 119-128
  • 28 Davies W, Chow M, Nagorney D. Extrahepatic biliary cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinoma. Report of seven cases and review of the literature. Ann Surg 1995; 222 (05) 619-625
  • 29 Sang X, Sun Y, Mao Y. et al. Hepatobiliary cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinomas: a report of 33 cases. Liver Int 2011; 31 (09) 1337-1344
  • 30 Lewin M, Mourra N, Honigman I. et al. Assessment of MRI and MRCP in diagnosis of biliary cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 2006; 16 (02) 407-413
  • 31 Vyas S, Markar S, Ezzat T. et al. Hepato-biliary cystadenoma with intraductal extension: unusual cause of obstructive jaundice. J Gastrointest Cancer 2012; 43 (Suppl. 01) S32-S37
  • 32 Hai S, Hirohashi K, Uenishi T. et al. Surgical management of cystic hepatic neoplasms. J Gastroenterol 2003; 38 (08) 759-764
  • 33 Tholomier C, Wang Y, Aleynikova O, Vanounou T, Pelletier JS. Biliary mucinous cystic neoplasm mimicking a hydatid cyst: a case report and literature review. BMC Gastroenterol 2019; 19 (01) 103
  • 34 Schlitter AM, Born D, Bettstetter M. et al. Intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct: stepwise progression to carcinoma involves common molecular pathways. Mod Pathol 2014; 27 (01) 73-86
  • 35 Zen Y, Jang KT, Ahn S. et al. Intraductal papillary neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the hepatobiliary system: demographic differences between Asian and Western populations, and comparison with pancreatic counterparts. Histopathology 2014; 65 (02) 164-173
  • 36 Kubota K, Jang JY, Nakanuma Y. et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: a Japan-Korea collaborative study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2020; 27 (09) 581-597
  • 37 Park HJ, Kim SY, Kim HJ. et al. Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: clinical, imaging, and pathologic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 211 (01) 67-75
  • 38 Ohtsuka M, Shimizu H, Kato A. et al. Intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct. Int J Hepatol 2014; 2014: 459091
  • 39 Harris AC, Ben-Ezra JM, Contos MJ, Kornstein MJ. Malignant lymphoma can present as hepatobiliary disease. Cancer 1996; 78 (09) 2011-2019
  • 40 Lei KI. Primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the liver. Leuk Lymphoma 1998; 29 (3-4): 293-299
  • 41 Elsayes KM, Menias CO, Willatt JM, Pandya A, Wiggins M, Platt J. Primary hepatic lymphoma: imaging findings. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2009; 53 (04) 373-379
  • 42 Hu HJ, Qu YJ, Tian ZX, Zhang ZP. Clinical and radiographic observations from four patients with primary hepatic lymphoma. Exp Ther Med 2016; 11 (02) 381-386
  • 43 Patnana M, Sevrukov AB, Elsayes KM, Viswanathan C, Lubner M, Menias CO. Inflammatory pseudotumor: the great mimicker. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198 (03) W217-27
  • 44 Calistri L, Maraghelli D, Nardi C. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver: a 2021 systematic literature update and series presentation. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47 (08) 2795-2810
  • 45 Yan FH, Zhou KR, Jiang YP, Shi WB. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver: 13 cases of MRI findings. World J Gastroenterol 2001; 7 (03) 422-424