Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770130
Mental Health Disorders in Circumcised Reproductive-age Women, Legal Dimensions and Prevention Strategies: A Narrative Review
Distúrbios de saúde mental em mulheres circuncidadas em idade reprodutiva, dimensões legais e estratégias de prevenção: uma revisão narrativa
Abstract
Objective: Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) can affect women's lives through various physical, psychological, social and even sexual mechanisms. According to the World Health Organization guidelines for managing the health effects of FGM/C, further research into its psychological effects and preventative measures is required. In this study, a comprehensive review of the mental health consequences of circumcised women of reproductive age has been conducted with a special focus on providing preventive solutions.
Methods: A comprehensive search of the Web of Science, PubMed(MEDLINE), Proquest, Scopus and Google scholar was carried outfrom 2000 to 2022. The second stage of search was conducted in grey literature. To facilitate a systematic approach to search the literature, the PECO framework, was adopted.
Results: The result of this narrative review study showed that, the most common mental health disorder in reproductive age circumcised women were depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder. Some studies found a significant relationship between parents' education level and circumcised girls, so that parents of the circumcised women had a low level of education. Two studies considered religious beliefs, tradition, cleanness, sexual desire control and virginity as the reasons for FGM/C.
Conclusion: All forms of FGM/C may be harmful to one's health. Women, who have undergone widespread forms of circumcision, are more likely to develop mental disorders. As the psychosocial effects of circumcision can affect the sexual experience of circumcised women, addressing this issue, emphasizing its legal aspects, and providing preventative solutions can improve physical, mental, social, and even sexual health in circumcised women.
Keywords
Circumcisions - Female - Infibulation - Clitoridectomy - Genital mutilation - Mental health - DepressionPublication History
Received: 18 March 2022
Accepted: 08 December 2022
Article published online:
20 June 2023
© 2023. Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 World Health Organization. Care of women and girls living with female genital mutilation: a clinical handbook [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2018. [cited January 19, 2022]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/272429
- 2 World Health Organization, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations Children's Fund. Female genital mutilation: a joint WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA statement [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 1997. [cited January 19, 2022]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/41903
- 3 Behrendt A, Moritz S. Posttraumatic stress disorder and memory problems after female genital mutilation. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162 (05) 1000-1002
- 4 World Health Organization. Female genital mutilation: integrating the prevention and the management of the health complications into the curricula of nursing and midwifery: a student's manual [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2001. [cited June 1, 2018]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/66857/WHO_FCH_GWH_01.4.pdf
- 5 United Nations Population Fund. Female genital mutilation (FGM) [Internet]. 2018 [cited January 19, 2022]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-protection/female-genital-mutilation/
- 6 Eliminating female genital mutilation: an interagency statement UNAIDS, UNDP, UNECA, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCHR, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2008. [cited January 19, 2022]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43839/9789241596442_eng.pdf?sequence=1
- 7 European Institute for Gender Equality. Female genital mutilation in the European Union-Report [Internet]. 2013 [cited January 19, 2022]. Available from: https://eige.europa.eu/publications/female-genital-mutilation-european-union-report?lang=it
- 8 Dehghankhalili M, Fallahi S, Mahmudi F. et al. Epidemiology, regional characteristics, knowledge, and attitude toward female genital mutilation/cutting in southern Iran. J Sex Med 2015; 12 (07) 1577-1583
- 9 Sipsma HL, Chen PG, Ofori-Atta A, Ilozumba UO, Karfo K, Bradley EH. Female genital cutting: current practices and beliefs in western Africa. Bull World Health Organ 2012; 90 (02) 120-127F
- 10 Puppo V. Female genital mutilation and cutting: An anatomical review and alternative rites. Clin Anat 2017; 30 (01) 81-88
- 11 Morison L, Scherf C, Ekpo G. et al. The long-term reproductive health consequences of female genital cutting in rural Gambia: a community-based survey. Trop Med Int Health 2001; 6 (08) 643-653
- 12 Berg RC, Denison EM, Fretheim A. Psychological, social and sexual consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a systematic review of quantitative studies. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; 2010
- 13 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Arlington: APA: 2013
- 14 Chibber R, El-Saleh E, El Harmi J. Female circumcision: obstetrical and psychological sequelae continues unabated in the 21st century. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011; 24 (06) 833-836
- 15 Knipscheer J, Vloeberghs E, van der Kwaak A, van den Muijsenbergh M. Mental health problems associated with female genital mutilation. BJPsych Bull 2015; 39 (06) 273-277
- 16 Abdulcadir J, Rodriguez MI, Say L. Research gaps in the care of women with female genital mutilation: an analysis. BJOG 2015; 122 (03) 294-303
- 17 Weny K, Silva R, Snow R, Legesse B, Diop N. Towards the elimination of FGM by 2030: A statistical assessment. PLoS One 2020; 15 (10) e0238782
- 18 Council of Europe. Istanbul Convention Action against violence against women and domestic violence [Internet]. 2018 [cited May 13, 2018]. Available from: www.coe.int/en/web/istanbul-convention/home
- 19 World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on the management of health complications from female genital mutilation [Internet]. 2016 [cited May 20, 2017]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/206437/1/9789241549646_eng.pdf?ua=1
- 20 Koch T. Story telling: is it really research?. J Adv Nurs 1998; 28 (06) 1182-1190
- 21 Uman LS. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2011; 20 (01) 57-59
- 22 Abdi F, Aghaie Z, Rahnemaie FS, Alimoradi Z. A systematic review of first trimester biochemical and molecular predictive tests for preeclampsia. Curr Hypertens Rev 2018; 14 (01) 21-28
- 23 Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth 2019; 13 (Suppl. 01) S31-S34
- 24 Im H, Swan LET, Heaton L. Polyvictimization and mental health consequences of female genital mutilation/circumcision (FGM/C) among Somali refugees in Kenya. Women Health 2020; 60 (06) 636-651
- 25 Obaid ZM, Amer AW, El Mahdy MA, Mohammed AE. Evaluation of psychological and sexual effects of female genital mutilation (Circumcision). Egypt J Hosp Med 2019; 74 (04) 726-734
- 26 Biglu MH, Farnam A, Abotalebi P. Impact of women circumcision on mental health. Int J Psychol Brain Sci 2017; 2 (04) 100-105
- 27 Daneshkhah F, Allahverdipour H, Jahangiri L, Andreeva T. Sexual function, mental well-being and quality of life among Kurdish circumcised women in Iran. Iran J Public Health 2017; 46 (09) 1265-1274
- 28 Ibrahim ZM, Ahmed MR, Mostafa RM. Psychosexual impact of female genital mutilation/cutting among Egyptian women. Hum Androl 2012; 2 (02) 36-41
- 29 Khodabakhshi Koolaee A, Pourebrahim T, Mohammadmoradi B, Hameedy MA. The comparison of marital satisfaction and mental health in genital mutilated females and non-genital mutilated females. Int J High Risk Behav Addict 2012; 1 (03) 115-120
- 30 Lever H, Ottenheimer D, Teysir J, Singer E, Atkinson HG. Depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and a history of pervasive gender-based violence among women asylum seekers who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting: a retrospective case review. J Immigr Minor Health 2019; 21 (03) 483-489
- 31 Piroozi B, Alinia C, Safari H. et al. Effect of female genital mutilation on mental health: a case-control study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2020; 25 (01) 33-36
- 32 Finkelhor D, Turner H, Hamby SL, Ormrod R. Polyvictimization: children's exposure to multiple types of violence, crime, and abuse. OJJDP Bull. 2011; (Oct): 1-12
- 33 Abdalla SM, Galea S. Is female genital mutilation/cutting associated with adverse mental health consequences? A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4 (04) e001553
- 34 Yasein Y. Prevalence of female genital mutilation among school girls in ElMansoura Center, El-Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2014; 13 (11) 76-83
- 35 Lockhat H. Female genital mutilation: treating the tears. London: Middlesex University Press; 2004. Review of the Bartlett A. Psychiatr Bull 2006; 30 (02) 78
- 36 Odukogbe AA, Afolabi BB, Bello OO, Adeyanju AS. Female genital mutilation/cutting in Africa. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6 (02) 138-148
- 37 World Health Organization, United Nations Children's Fund, United Nations Population Fund. Female genital mutilation: a joint WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA statement [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 1997. [cited June 1, 2018]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/41903
- 38 United Nations Children's Fund. Female genital mutilation/cutting: a global concern. UNICEF's data work on FGM/C [Internet]. New York: UNICEF; 2016. [cited June 1, 2018]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/resources/female-genital-mutilationcutting-global-concern/
- 39 McCauley M, van den Broek N. Challenges in the eradication of female genital mutilation/cutting. Int Health 2019; 11 (01) 1-4
- 40 Her Majesty's Government. Multi-agency practice guidelines: female genital mutilation [Internet]. London: HM Government; 2011. [cited June 1, 2018]. Available from: https://www.health-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/health/Multi-Agency%20Practice%20Guidelines%20on%20Female%20Genital%20Mutilation.pdf
- 41 Home Office Procedural Information for Mandatory Reporting of Female Genital Mutilation – procedural information [Internet]. 2016 [cited June 1, 2018]. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/573782/FGM_Mandatory_Reporting_-_procedural_information_nov16_FINAL.pdf
- 42 Denison E, Berg RC, Lewin S, Fretheim A. Effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting. Oslo: : Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2009
- 43 The Donors Working Group on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting. Toward a common framework for the abandonment of FGM/C. Florence: : UNICEF; 2007
- 44 Mohamed N, Schickler P, Warsame Z. Hear Our Voices': A report on participatory workshops on FGM/C (Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting) with the Somali Community in Tower Hamlets. London: Women's Health and Family Services; 2014
- 45 Buggio L, Facchin F, Chiappa L, Barbara G, Brambilla M, Vercellini P. Psychosexual consequences of female genital mutilation and the impact of reconstructive surgery: a narrative review. Health Equity 2019; 3 (01) 36-46