Robotics in Microsurgery and Supermicrosurgery

Abstract

Microsurgery has changed the ability to perform highly precise and technical surgeries through the utilization of high-powered microscopes and specialized instruments to manipulate and repair anatomical structures as small as a few millimeters. Since the first human trials of robotic-assisted microsurgery in 2006, the expansion of microsurgery to supermicrosurgery (luminal diameter less than 1 mm) has enabled successful repair of previously inaccessible structures. Surgical robotic systems can offer two distinct operative advantages: (1) minimal access surgery—by entering body cavities through ports, flap harvest can be redesigned to affect a minimally invasive approach for flaps such as the rectus abdominis muscle, the latissimus flap, and the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap; and (2) precision—by eliminating physiologic tremor, improving ergonomics, increasing accessibility to difficult spaces, and providing motion scaling, precision is significantly enhanced. Robotic-assisted microsurgery is a promising application of robotics for the plastic surgeon and has played an important role in flap harvest, head and neck reconstruction, nerve reconstruction, gender-affirming surgery, and lymphatic reconstruction—all the while minimizing surgical morbidity. This article aims to review the history, technology, and application of microsurgery and supermicrosurgery in plastic surgery.

Keywords

robotic microsurgery - robotic breast reconstruction - supermicrosurgery - robotic plastic surgery

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
04. März 2024

• References

• 1 Badash I, Gould DJ, Patel KM. Supermicrosurgery: history, applications, training and the future. Front Surg 2018; 5: 23
• 2 Li RA, Jensen J, Bowersox JC. Microvascular anastomoses performed in rats using a microsurgical telemanipulator. Comput Aided Surg 2000; 5 (05) 326-332
• 3 Knight CG, Lorincz A, Cao A, Gidell K, Klein MD, Langenburg SE. Computer-assisted, robot-enhanced open microsurgery in an animal model. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005; 15 (02) 182-185
• 4 Katz RD, Rosson GD, Taylor JA, Singh NK. Robotics in microsurgery: use of a surgical robot to perform a free flap in a pig. Microsurgery 2005; 25 (07) 566-569
• 5 Taleb C, Nectoux E, Liverneaux P. Limb replantation with two robots: a feasibility study in a pig model. Microsurgery 2009; 29 (03) 232-235
• 6 Boyd B, Umansky J, Samson M, Boyd D, Stahl K. Robotic harvest of internal mammary vessels in breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2006; 22 (04) 261-266
• 7 Selber JC. Transoral robotic reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (06) 1978-1987
• 8 van der Hulst R, Sawor J, Bouvy N. Microvascular anastomosis: is there a role for robotic surgery?. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60 (01) 101-102
• 9 van Mulken TJM, Schols RM, Scharmga AMJ. et al; MicroSurgical Robot Research Group. First-in-human robotic supermicrosurgery using a dedicated microsurgical robot for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized pilot trial. Nat Commun 2020; 11 (01) 757
• 10 Azizian M, Liu M, Khalaji I, DiMaio S. The da Vinci Surgical System. In: Patel RV, ed. The Encyclopedia of Medical Robots. World Scientific, 2018: 3-28
• 11 Wu CF, Cheng C, Suen KH, Stein H, Chao YK. A preclinical feasibility study of single-port robotic subcostal anatomical lung resection and subxiphoid thymectomy using the da Vinci^® SP system. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13 (03) 460
• 12 Clemens MW, Kronowitz S, Selber JC. Robotic-assisted latissimus dorsi harvest in delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2014; 28 (01) 20-25
• 13 Patel NV, Pedersen JC. Robotic harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle: a preclinical investigation and case report. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (07) 477-480
• 14 Dy GW, Blasdel G, Shakir NA, Bluebond-Langner R, Zhao LC. Robotic peritoneal flap revision of gender affirming vaginoplasty: a novel technique for treating neovaginal stenosis. Urology 2021; 154: 308-314
• 15 Lai CS, Lu CT, Liu SA, Tsai YC, Chen YW, Chen IC. Robot-assisted microvascular anastomosis in head and neck free flap reconstruction: preliminary experiences and results. Microsurgery 2019; 39 (08) 715-720
• 16 Choi JH, Song SY, Park HS. et al. Robotic DIEP flap harvest through a totally extraperitoneal approach using a single-port surgical robotic system. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148 (02) 304-307
• 17 Facca S, Hendriks S, Mantovani G, Selber JC, Liverneaux P. Robot-assisted surgery of the shoulder girdle and brachial plexus. Semin Plast Surg 2014; 28 (01) 39-44
• 18 van Mulken TJM, Wolfs JAGN, Qiu SS. et al; MicroSurgical Robot Research Group. One-year outcomes of the first human trial on robot-assisted lymphaticovenous anastomosis for breast cancer-related lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (01) 151-161
• 19 Innocenti M, Malzone G, Menichini G. First-in-human free-flap tissue reconstruction using a dedicated microsurgical robotic platform. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151 (05) 1078-1082
• 20 Lindenblatt N, Grünherz L, Wang A. et al. Early experience using a new robotic microsurgical system for lymphatic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10 (01) e4013
• 21 Tan YPA, Liverneaux P, Wong JKF. Current limitations of surgical robotics in reconstructive plastic microsurgery. Front Surg 2018; 5: 22
• 22 Brahmbhatt JV, Gudeloglu A, Liverneaux P, Parekattil SJ. Robotic microsurgery optimization. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (03) 225-230
• 23 Parekattil SJ, Moran ME. Robotic instrumentation: evolution and microsurgical applications. Indian J Urol 2010; 26 (03) 395-403
• 24 Biron VL, O'Connell DA, Barber B. et al. Transoral robotic surgery with radial forearm free flap reconstruction: case control analysis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 46 (01) 20
• 25 Schmidt M, Aszmann OC, Beck H, Frey M. The anatomic basis of the internal mammary artery perforator flap: a cadaver study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (02) 191-196
• 26 Chung JH, You HJ, Kim HS, Lee BI, Park SH, Yoon ES. A novel technique for robot assisted latissimus dorsi flap harvest. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (07) 966-972
• 27 Selber JC. Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (02) 88e-90e
• 28 Khan MTA, Won BW, Baumgardner K. et al. Literature review: robotic-assisted harvest of deep inferior epigastric flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 89 (06) 703-708
• 29 Selber JC. The robotic DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (02) 340-343
• 30 Lee MJ, Won J, Song SY. et al. Clinical outcomes following robotic versus conventional DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: a retrospective matched study. Front Oncol 2022; 12: 989231
• 31 Chang DW, Suami H, Skoracki R. A prospective analysis of 100 consecutive lymphovenous bypass cases for treatment of extremity lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (05) 1305-1314
• 32 Frey JD, Yu JW, Cohen SM, Zhao LC, Choi M, Levine JP. Robotically assisted omentum flap harvest: a novel, minimally invasive approach for vascularized lymph node transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (04) e2505
• 33 Campisi C, Davini D, Bellini C. et al. Lymphatic microsurgery for the treatment of lymphedema. Microsurgery 2006; 26 (01) 65-69
• 34 Bishop SN, Selber JC. Minimally invasive robotic breast reconstruction surgery. Gland Surg 2021; 10 (01) 469-478
• 35 Maruccia M, Giudice G, Ciudad P. et al. Lymph node transfer and neo-lymphangiogenesis. From theory to evidence. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023
• 36 Lin WC, Safa B, Buntic RF. Approach to lymphedema management. Semin Plast Surg 2022; 36 (04) 260-273
• 37 Teven CM, Yi J, Hammond JB. et al. Expanding the horizon: single-port robotic vascularized omentum lymphatic transplant. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (02) e3414
• 38 Ciudad P, Date S, Lee MH. et al. Robotic harvest of a right gastroepiploic lymph node flap. Arch Plast Surg 2016; 43 (02) 210-212
• 39 Haverland R, Rebecca AM, Hammond J, Yi J. A case series of robot-assisted rectus abdominis flap harvest for pelvic reconstruction: a single institution experience. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021; 28 (02) 245-248
• 40 Asaad M, Pisters LL, Klein GT. et al. Robotic rectus abdominis muscle flap following robotic extirpative surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148 (06) 1377-1381
• 41 Bourges JL, Hubschman JP, Burt B, Culjat M, Schwartz SD. Robotic microsurgery: corneal transplantation. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93 (12) 1672-1675
• 42 Lee L, Edwards K, Hunter IA. et al. Quality of local excision for rectal neoplasms using transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus transanal minimally invasive surgery: a multi-institutional matched analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60 (09) 928-935
• 43 Gudeloglu A, Brahmbhatt JV, Parekattil SJ. Robotic-assisted microsurgery for an elective microsurgical practice. Semin Plast Surg 2014; 28 (01) 11-19
• 44 Rao PP. Robotic surgery: new robots and finally some real competition!. World J Urol 2018; 36 (04) 537-541
• 45 Farinha R, Puliatti S, Mazzone E. et al. Potential contenders for the leadership in robotic surgery. J Endourol 2022; 36 (03) 317-326
• 46 Alkatout I, Salehiniya H, Allahqoli L. Assessment of the Versius Robotic Surgical System in minimal access surgery: a systematic review. J Clin Med 2022; 11 (13) 3754