Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1772240
Timing of Surgery and Pre-operative Physiological Parameters as Clinical Predictors of Surgical Outcomes in Traumatic Subaxial Cervical Spine Fractures and Dislocations
Article in several languages: português | EnglishFinancial Support There was no financial support from public, commercial, or non-profit sources.

Abstract
Objective To evaluate the risk factors and outcomes in patients surgically treated for subaxial cervical spine injuries with respect of the timing of surgery and preoperative physiological parameters of the patient.
Methods 26 patients with sub-axial cervical spine fractures and dislocations were enrolled. Demographic data of patients, appropriate radiological investigation, and physiological parameters like respiratory rate, blood pressure, heart rate, PaO2 and ASIA impairment scale were documented. They were divided pre-operatively into 2 groups. Group U with patients having abnormal physiological parameters and Group S including patients having physiological parameters within normal range. They were further subdivided into early and late groups according to the timing of surgery as Uearly, Ulate, Searly and Slate. All the patients were called for follow-up at 1, 6 and 12 months.
Results 56 percent of patients in Group S had neurological improvement by one ASIA grade and a good outcome irrespective of the timing of surgery. Patients in Group U having unstable physiological parameters and undergoing early surgical intervention had poor outcomes.
Conclusion This study concludes that early surgical intervention in physiologically unstable patients had a strong association as a risk factor in the final outcome of the patients in terms of mortality and morbidity. Also, no positive association of improvement in physiologically stable patients with respect to the timing of surgery could be established.
Authors' Contributions
Each author contributed individually and significantly to the development of this article: AK - Principal investigator of the study and author. HM - Operating surgeon and co-author. VC - Care of the patients included in the study and editing of manuscript. PS, KP and CN – Care of the Patient.
Work developed in the Department of Orthopaedics, New Civil Hospital Surat, Gujarat, India.
Publication History
Received: 14 February 2022
Accepted: 05 May 2023
Article published online:
30 August 2023
© 2023. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
Referências
- 1 Ning GZ, Wu Q, Li YL, Feng SQ. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Asia: a systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med 2012; 35 (04) 229-239
- 2 Rahimi-Movaghar V, Sayyah MK, Akbari H. et al. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in developing countries: a systematic review. Neuroepidemiology 2013; 41 (02) 65-85
- 3 Gupta DK, Vaghani G, Siddiqui S. et al. Early versus delayed decompression in acute subaxial cervical spinal cord injury: A prospective outcome study at a Level I trauma center from India. Asian J Neurosurg 2015; 10 (03) 158-165
- 4 Vaccaro AR, Hulbert RJ, Patel AA. et al; Spine Trauma Study Group. The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex. Spine 2007; 32 (21) 2365-2374
- 5 Grassner L, Wutte C, Klein B. et al. Early Decompression (< 8 h) after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Improves Functional Outcome as Assessed by Spinal Cord Independence Measure after One Year. J Neurotrauma 2016; 33 (18) 1658-1666
- 6 Oner C, Rajasekaran S, Chapman JR. et al. Spine Trauma-What Are the Current Controversies?. J Orthop Trauma 2017; 31 (Suppl. 04) S1-S6
- 7 Admasu AK, Buno E. Short-Term Outcome in Subaxial Spine Injury Patients Operated on in a Resource-Limited Setting, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. World Neurosurg 2018; 113: e702-e706
- 8 Dhakal GR, Bhandari R, Dhungana S. et al. Review of Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries Presenting to a Tertiary-Level Hospital in Nepal: Challenges in Surgical Management in a Third World Scenario. Global Spine J 2019; 9 (07) 713-716
- 9 Ter Wengel PV, De Witt Hamer PC, Pauptit JC, van der Gaag NA, Oner FC, Vandertop WP. Early Surgical Decompression Improves Neurological Outcome after Complete Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Meta-Analysis. J Neurotrauma 2019; 36 (06) 835-844
- 10 Carlson GD, Gorden CD, Oliff HS, Pillai JJ, LaManna JC. Sustained spinal cord compression: part I: time-dependent effect on long-term pathophysiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85 (01) 86-94
- 11 Aarabi B, Akhtar-Danesh N, Chryssikos T. et al. Efficacy of Ultra-Early (< 12 h), Early (12-24 h), and Late (>24-138.5 h) Surgery with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Confirmed Decompression in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Grades A, B, and C Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma 2020; 37 (03) 448-457
- 12 Zaveri G, Das G. Management of Sub-axial Cervical Spine Injuries. Indian J Orthop 2017; 51 (06) 633-652
- 13 Jug M, Kejžar N, Vesel M. et al. Neurological Recovery after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Is Superior if Surgical Decompression and Instrumented Fusion Are Performed within 8 Hours versus 8 to 24 Hours after Injury: A Single Center Experience. J Neurotrauma 2015; 32 (18) 1385-1392
- 14 Hadley MN, Walters BC. The case for the future role of evidence-based medicine in the management of cervical spine injuries, with or without fractures. J Neurosurg Spine 2019; 31 (04) 457-463
- 15 Aarabi B, Olexa J, Chryssikos T. et al. Extent of Spinal Cord Decompression in Motor Complete (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Grades A and B) Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Patients: Post-Operative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Standard Operative Approaches. J Neurotrauma 2019; 36 (06) 862-876
- 16 Cao BH, Wu ZM, Liang JW. Risk Factors for Poor Prognosis of Cervical Spinal Cord Injury with Subaxial Cervical Spine Fracture-Dislocation After Surgical Treatment: A CONSORT Study. Med Sci Monit 2019; 25: 1970-1975
- 17 Malik SA, Murphy M, Connolly P, O'Byrne J. Evaluation of morbidity, mortality and outcome following cervical spine injuries in elderly patients. Eur Spine J 2008; 17 (04) 585-591
- 18 Pourtaheri S, Emami A, Sinha K. et al. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in acute cervical spine fractures. Spine J 2014; 14 (11) 2546-2553
- 19 Tuli S, Tuli J, Coleman WP, Geisler FH, Krassioukov A. Hemodynamic parameters and timing of surgical decompression in acute cervical spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2007; 30 (05) 482-490
- 20 Berney SC, Gordon IR, Opdam HI, Denehy L. A classification and regression tree to assist clinical decision making in airway management for patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2011; 49 (02) 244-250
- 21 Premkumar DT, Pathiarasakumar D. A study on functional outcome following surgical fixation for subaxial cervical spine injuries. Int J Orthop Sci 2018; 4 (2i): 590-595
- 22 Ruiz IA, Squair JW, Phillips AA. et al. Incidence and Natural Progression of Neurogenic Shock after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma 2018; 35 (03) 461-466
- 23 Qiu Z, Wang F, Hong Y. et al. Clinical Predictors of Neurological Outcome within 72 h after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 38909
- 24 Schüller-Weidekamm C. [Cervical spine injury. Diagnosis, prognosis and management]. Radiologe 2008; 48 (05) 480-487
- 25 Jug M, Kejžar N, Cimerman M, Bajrović FF. Window of opportunity for surgical decompression in patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg Spine 2019; •••: 1-9 [published online ahead of print, 2019 Dec 27]