Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Coloproctology 2023; 43(03): e179-e184
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1772783
Original Article

Discrepancies of Abstracts Presented in Coloproctology Congresses and Later Publish as Full Manuscripts. A Brazilian Perspective

1   Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
2   Faculty of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
,
2   Faculty of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
,
2   Faculty of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
,
2   Faculty of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
,
2   Faculty of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
,
1   Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
2   Faculty of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
,
1   Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
2   Faculty of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Introduction The purpose of this retrospective bibliometric study was to assess the discrepancies between coloproctology surgery meeting abstracts and subsequent full-length manuscript publications.

Methods Abstracts presented at the Brazilian Congress of Coloproctology Surgery from 2015 to 2019 were compared with matching manuscript publications. Discrepancies between the abstract and therefore the subsequent manuscript were categorized as major (changes within the purpose, methods, study design, sample size, statistical analysis, results, and conclusions) and minor (changes within the title, authorship, and number of female authors) variations.

Results The conversion rate of abstracts in published manuscripts was 6,9% (121 abstracts). There were inconsistencies between the study title (66,1%), authorship (69,5%), study design (3,3%), sample size (39,2%), statistical analysis (24,8%), results (25,6%), and conclusions (12,4%) of manuscripts compared with their corresponding meeting abstracts.

Conclusion As changes occur before manuscript publication of coloproctology surgery meeting abstracts, caution should be exercised in referencing abstracts or altering surgical practices based on abstracts content.



Publication History

Received: 17 February 2023

Accepted: 21 June 2023

Article published online:
21 September 2023

© 2023. Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil