RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1773783
Twenty-four Hours Stay After Colorectal Surgery; A Systematic Review
Authors
Funding There was no funding involved in this study. Sponsor of this study is the department of Surgery in Antonius hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.

Abstract
Introduction The introduction of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery led to increasing twenty-four hours discharge pathways, for example in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bariatric surgery. However, implementation in colorectal surgery still must set off. This systematic review assesses safety and feasibility of twenty-four hours discharge in colorectal surgery in terms of readmission and complications in current literature. Secondary outcome was identification of factors associated with success of twenty-four hours discharge.
Methods Pubmed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify studies investigating twenty-four hours discharge in colorectal surgery, without restriction of study type. Search strategy included keywords relating to ambulatory management and colorectal surgery. Studies were scored according to MINORS score.
Results Thirteen studies were included in this systematic review, consisting of six prospective and seven retrospective studies. Number of participants of the included prospective studies ranged from 5 to 157. Median success of discharge was 96% in the twenty-four hours discharge group. All prospective studies showed similar readmission and complication rates between twenty-four hours discharge and conventional postoperative management. Factors associated with success of twenty-four hours discharge were low ASA classification, younger age, minimally invasive approach, and relatively shorter operation time.
Conclusions Twenty-four hours discharge in colorectal surgery seems feasible and safe, based on retro- and prospective studies. Careful selection of patients and establishment of a clear and adequate protocol are key items to assure safety and feasibility. Results should be interpreted with caution, due to heterogeneity. To confirm results, an adequately powered prospective randomized study is needed.
Keywords
ERAS - ambulatory - 24 hours discharge - twenty-four hours stay - hospitalization - colorectalAuthors' Contributions
Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work: Smalbroek, Schuffel, Weijs, Smits
Drafting the article: Smalbroek. Schuffel
Revising the article critically for important intellectual content: Weijs, Dijksman, Poelmann,, Boerma, Smits
Final approval of the version to be published: Smalbroek, Schuffel, Weijs, Dijksman, Poelmann, Wijffels, Smits
All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Availability of Data
All data used is present in this article or supplementary material.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 04. Juli 2023
Angenommen: 14. August 2023
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. September 2023
© 2023. Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1
Sung H,
Ferlay J,
Siegel RL.
et al.
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide
for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71 (03) 209-249
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 2 Zhao D, Li Y, Wang S, Huang Z. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 3-year follow-up outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016; 31 (04) 805-811
- 3 Zhang X, Wu Q, Hu T, Gu C, Bi L, Wang Z. Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Open Surgery in Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 28 (02) 189-200
- 4 Trinh BB, Jackson NR, Hauch AT, Hu T, Kandil E. Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery. JSLS 2014; 18 (04) e2014.00187
- 5 Zhang X, Wei Z, Bie M, Peng X, Chen C. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (12) 5601-5614
- 6 Campbell S, Fichera A, Thomas S, Papaconstantinou H, Essani R. Outpatient colectomy-a dream or reality?. Proc Bayl Univ Med Cent 2021; 35 (01) 24-27
- 7 Cavallaro P, Bordeianou L. Implementation of an ERAS Pathway in Colorectal Surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2019; 32 (02) 102-108
- 8 Balciscueta I, Barberà F, Lorenzo J, Martínez S, Sebastián M, Balciscueta Z. Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of predictors of failure. Surgery 2021; 170 (02) 373-382
- 9 Gurusamy K, Junnarkar S, Farouk M, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2008; 95 (02) 161-168
- 10 Ahmad NZ, Byrnes G, Naqvi SA. A meta-analysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2008; 22 (09) 1928-1934
- 11 Greilsamer T, Orion F, Denimal F. et al. Increasing success in outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy by an optimal clinical pathway. ANZ J Surg 2018
- 12 Trevino CM, Katchko KM, Verhaalen AL, Bruce ML, Webb TP. Cost Effectiveness of a Fast-Track Protocol for Urgent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies and Appendectomies. World J Surg 2016; 40 (04) 856-862
- 13 Calland JF, Tanaka K, Foley E. et al. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: patient outcomes after implementation of a clinical pathway. Ann Surg 2001; 233 (05) 704-715
- 14 Topal B, Peeters G, Verbert A, Penninckx F. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: clinical pathway implementation is efficient and cost effective and increases hospital bed capacity. Surg Endosc 2007; 21 (07) 1142-1146
- 15 Global spending on health: Weathering the storm. 2020
- 16 Aftab H, Fagerland MW, Gondal G, Ghanima W, Olsen MK, Nordby T. Gastric sleeve resection as day-case surgery: what affects the discharge time?. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2019; 15 (12) 2018-2024
- 17 Barbat S, Thompson KJ, Mckillop IH, Kuwada TS, Gersin K, Nimeri A. Ambulatory bariatric surgery: does it really lead to higher rates of adverse events?. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2020; 16 (11) 1713-1720
- 18 Friedlander DF, Krimphove MJ, Cole AP. et al. Where Is the Value in Ambulatory Versus Inpatient Surgery?. Ann Surg 2021; 273 (05) 909-916
- 19 Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M. et al; PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015; 4 (01) 1
- 20 Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73 (09) 712-716
- 21 Hyde M, Higgs P, Wiggins RD, Blane D. A decade of research using the CASP scale: key findings and future directions. Vol. 19, Aging & mental health. England; 2015: 571-575
- 22 de Azevedo JGM, Mendes CRS, Lima MA. et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery and discharge within 24 h-who is at risk for readmission?. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23 (10) 2714-2722
- 23 Lee L, Kelly J, Nassif GJ, deBeche-Adams TC, Albert MR, Monson JRT. Defining the learning curve for transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (04) 1534-1542
- 24 Brandt E, Poulsen M, Lykke J, Jess P, Ovesen H. A minority of patients discharged within 24. hours after laparoscopic colon resection. Dan Med J 2013; 60 (07) A4658
- 25 Gignoux B, Gosgnach M, Lanz T. et al. Short-term Outcomes of Ambulatory Colectomy for 157 Consecutive Patients. Ann Surg 2019; 270 (02) 317-321
- 26 Gignoux B, Pasquer A, Vulliez A, Lanz T. Outpatient colectomy within an enhanced recovery program. J Visc Surg 2015; 152 (01) 11-15
- 27 Chasserant P, Gosgnach M. Improvement of peri-operative patient management to enable outpatient colectomy. J Visc Surg 2016; 153 (05) 333-337
- 28 Studniarek A, Borsuk DJ, Kochar K, Park JJ, Marecik SJ. Feasibility assessment of outpatient colorectal resections at a tertiary referral center. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36 (03) 501-508
- 29 Saadat LV, Mahvi DA, Jolissaint JS. et al. Twenty-Three-Hour-Stay Colectomy Without Increased Readmissions: An Analysis of 1905 Cases from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. World J Surg 2020; 44 (03) 947-956
- 30 Levy BF, Scott MJP, Fawcett WJ, Rockall TA. 23-hour-stay laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52 (07) 1239-1243
- 31 Dobradin A, Ganji M, Alam SE, Kar PM. Laparoscopic colon resections with discharge less than 24 hours. JSLS 2013; 17 (02) 198-203
- 32 Lee L, Eustache J, Baldini G. et al. Enhanced Recovery 2.0 - Same Day Discharge With Mobile App Follow-Up After Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery. Ann Surg 2021
- 33 Kiran RP, Herman K, Khoshknabi D, Angistriotis A, Church JM. Feasibility and Safety of Ambulatory Surgery as the Next Management Paradigm in Colorectal Resection Surgery. Ann Surg 2022; 276 (03) 562-569
- 34 Curfman KR, Poola AS, Blair GE. et al. Ambulatory colectomy: a pathway for advancing the enhanced recovery protocol. J Robot Surg 2022; ; (0123456789):
- 35 Popeskou SG, Christou N, Panteleimonitis S, Langford E, Qureshi T, Parvaiz A. Safety and Feasibility of a Discharge within 23 Hours after Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery. J Clin Med 2022; 11 (17) 5068
- 36 Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M. et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg 2019; 43 (03) 659-695
- 37 Chung F. Discharge criteria–a new trend. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42 (11) 1056-1058
- 38 Palumbo P, Tellan G, Perotti B, Pacilè MA, Vietri F, Illuminati G. Modified PADSS (Post Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System) for monitoring outpatients discharge. Ann Ital Chir 2013; 84 (06) 661-665
- 39 Ripollés-Melchor J, Ramírez-Rodríguez JM, Casans-Francés R. et al; POWER Study Investigators Group for the Spanish Perioperative Audit and Research Network (REDGERM). Association Between Use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol and Postoperative Complications in Colorectal Surgery: The Postoperative Outcomes Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol (POWER) Study. JAMA Surg 2019; 154 (08) 725-736
- 40 Diers J, Baum P, Matthes H, Germer C-T, Wiegering A. Mortality and complication management after surgery for colorectal cancer depending on the DKG minimum amounts for hospital volume. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47 (04) 850-857
- 41 Diaz A, Barmash E, Azap R, Paredes AZ, Hyer JM, Pawlik TM. Association of County-Level Social Vulnerability with Elective Versus Non-elective Colorectal Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25 (03) 786-794
- 42 Tweed TTT, Woortman C, Tummers S, Bakens MJAM, van Bastelaar J, Stoot JHMB. Reducing hospital stay for colorectal surgery in ERAS setting by means of perioperative patient education of expected day of discharge. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36 (07) 1535-1542
- 43 Emmanuel A, Chohda E, Botfield C, Ellul J. Accelerated discharge within 72. hours of colorectal cancer resection using simple discharge criteria. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2018; 100 (01) 52-56
- 44 Fiore Jr JFJ, Browning L, Bialocerkowski A, Gruen RL, Faragher IG, Denehy L. Hospital discharge criteria following colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14 (03) 270-281
- 45 Haveman ME, Jonker LT, Hermens HJ, Tabak M, de Vries J-PP. Effectiveness of current perioperative telemonitoring on postoperative outcome in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: A systematic review of controlled trials. J Telemed Telecare 2021; 1357633 × 211047710
- 46 Wrenn SM, Cepeda-Benito A, Ramos-Valadez DI, Cataldo PA. Patient Perceptions and Quality of Life After Colon and Rectal Surgery: What Do Patients Really Want?. Dis Colon Rectum 2018; 61 (08) 971-978