CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2018; 06(05): E594-E601
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-102091
Original article
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018

Comparable efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis

Chikara Iino
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hematology, Hirosaki National Hospital, Aomori, Japan
2   Department of Internal medicine, Hirosaki Municipal Hospital, Aomori, Japan
3   Department of Gastroenterology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan
,
Tadashi Shimoyama
3   Department of Gastroenterology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan
,
Takasato Igarashi
2   Department of Internal medicine, Hirosaki Municipal Hospital, Aomori, Japan
3   Department of Gastroenterology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan
,
Tomoyuki Aihara
2   Department of Internal medicine, Hirosaki Municipal Hospital, Aomori, Japan
,
Kentaro Ishii
2   Department of Internal medicine, Hirosaki Municipal Hospital, Aomori, Japan
,
Juichi Sakamoto
2   Department of Internal medicine, Hirosaki Municipal Hospital, Aomori, Japan
,
Hiroshi Tono
2   Department of Internal medicine, Hirosaki Municipal Hospital, Aomori, Japan
,
Shinsaku Fukuda
3   Department of Gastroenterology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 19 May 2017

accepted after revision 22 January 2018

Publication Date:
08 May 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background and study aims Although endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) is reportedly useful in patients who have acute cholecystitis, its efficacy has not been compared to that of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD). We retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of ETGBD and PTGBD in patients with acute cholecystitis.

Patients and methods We studied 75 patients who required gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis between January 2014 and December 2016. Using propensity score matching analysis, we compared the clinical efficacy and length of hospitalization in patients successfully treated with ETGBD and PTGBD. Moreover, we assessed the predictive factors for hospitalization period < 30 days using multivariate analysis.

Results ETGBD and PTGBD were successfully performed in 33 patients (77 %) and 42 patients (100 %) (P < 0.001). Twenty-seven matched pairs were obtained after propensity score matching analysis. No significant differences were observed between patients treated with ETGBD and those treated with PTGBD with respect to improvement in white blood cell count and serum C-reactive protein level. The length of hospitalization in patients treated with ETGBD was significantly shorter than in those treated with PTGBD regardless of the need for surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed ETGBD (odds ratio, 7.07; 95 % confidence interval 2.22 – 22.46) and surgery (odds ratio 0.26; 95 % confidence interval 0.09 – 0.79) as independent factors associated with hospitalization period. There were no significant differences in occurrence of complications in ETGBD and PTGBD procedure.

Conclusions ETGBD was shown to be as useful as PTGBD for treatment of acute cholecystitis and was associated with shorter hospitalization period. ETGBD can be an alternative treatment option for acute cholecystitis at times when PTGBD is not possible.

 
  • References

  • 1 Hannan EL, Imperato PJ, Nenner RP. et al. Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in New York State: mortality, complications, and choice of procedure. Surgery 1999; 125: 223-231
  • 2 Yamashita Y, Takada T, Strasberg SM. et al. TG13 surgical management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013; 20: 89-96
  • 3 Houghton PW, Jenkinson LR, Donaldson LA. Cholecystectomy in the elderly: a prospective study. Br J Surg 1985; 72: 220-222
  • 4 Frazee RC, Nagorney DM, Mucha Jr P. Acute acalculous cholecystitis. Mayo Clin Proc 1989; 64: 163-167
  • 5 Tsuyuguchi T, Itoi T, Takada T. et al. TG13 indications and techniques for gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013; 20: 81-88
  • 6 Feretis C, Apostolidis N, Mallas E. et al. Endoscopic drainage of acute obstructive cholecystitis in patients with increased operative risk. Endoscopy 1993; 25: 392-395
  • 7 Baron TH, Schroeder PL, Schwartzberg MS. et al. Resolution of Mirizzi’s syndrome using endoscopic therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 343-345
  • 8 Nakatsu T, Okada H, Saito K. et al. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1997; 4: 31-35
  • 9 Toyota N, Takada T, Amano H. et al. Endoscopic naso-gallbladder drainage in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: alleviates inflammation and fixes operator’s aim during early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2006; 13: 80-85
  • 10 Kjaer DW, Kruse A, Funch-Jensen P. Endoscopic gallbladder drainage of patients with acute cholecystitis. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 304-308
  • 11 Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F. et al. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis in whom percutaneous transhepatic approach is contraindicated or anatomically impossible (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 455-460
  • 12 Ogawa O, Yoshikumi H, Maruoka N. et al. Predicting the success of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for patients with acute cholecystitis during pretreatment evaluation. Can J Gastroenterol 2008; 22: 681-685
  • 13 Yane K, Maguchi H, Katanuma A. et al. Feasibility, efficacy, and predictive factors for the technical success of endoscopic nasogallbladder drainage: a prospective study. Gut Liver 2015; 9: 239-246
  • 14 Tamada K, Seki H, Sato K. et al. Efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholecystoendoprosthesis (ERCCE) for cholecystitis. Endoscopy 1991; 23: 2-3
  • 15 Johlin Jr FC, Neil GA. Drainage of the gallbladder in patients with acute acalculous cholecystitis by transpapillary endoscopic cholecystotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: 645-651
  • 16 Shrestha R, Bilir BM, Everson GT. et al. Endoscopic stenting of gallbladder for symptomatic cholelithiasis in patients with end-stage liver disease awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 595-598
  • 17 Schlenker C, Trotter JF, Shah RJ. et al. Endoscopic gallbladder stent placement for treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis in patients with end-stage liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 278-283
  • 18 Pannala R, Petersen BT, Gostout CJ. et al. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage: 10-year single center experience. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 2008; 54: 107-113
  • 19 Inoue T, Okumura F, Kachi K. et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic gallbladder stenting in high-risk surgical patients with calculous cholecystitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 905-913
  • 20 Hatanaka T, Itoi T, Ijima M. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic gallbladder stenting for acute cholecystitis in patients with concomitant unresectable cancer. Intern Med 2016; 55: 1411-1417
  • 21 Maekawa S, Nomura R, Murase T. et al. Endoscopic gallbladder stenting for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study of 46 elderly patients aged 65 years or older. BMC Gastroenterol 2013; 13: 65
  • 22 Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM. et al. TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013; 20: 35-46
  • 23 Itoi T, Coelho-Prabhu N, Baron TH. Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for management of acute cholecystitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1038-1045
  • 24 Khan MA, Atiq O, Kubiliun N. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: Is it better than percutaneous gallbladder drainage?. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 76-87
  • 25 Jang JW, Lee SS, Song TJ. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage are comparable for acute cholecystitis. Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 805-811
  • 26 Kedia P, Sharaiha RZ, Kumta NA. et al. Endoscopic gallbladder drainage compared with percutaneous drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 1031-1036
  • 27 Tsuyuguchi T, Takada T, Kawarada Y. et al. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007; 14: 46-51
  • 28 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
  • 29 Itoi T, Kawakami H, Katanuma A. et al. Endoscopic nasogallbladder tube or stent placement in acute cholecystitis: a preliminary prospective randomized trial in Japan. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 111-118