CC BY 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1782199
Original Research

Rehabilitation Surgery for Peripheral Facial Nerve Injury after Facial Trauma

1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam
,
Thuy Phan Chung Tran
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam
,
Duong Van Tran
2   Department of Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam
,
Hiep Xuan Tran
3   Department of Plastic and Microsurgery, Ho Chi Minh City National Hospital of Odontology, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
,
Albert J. Fox
4   Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, Southcoast Hospitals Group, New Bedford, Massachusetts, United States
,
Luan Viet Tran
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam
› Author Affiliations
Funding The author(s) received no financial support for the research.

Abstract

Introduction Facial trauma can cause damage to the facial nerve, which can have negative effects on function, aesthetics, and quality of life if left untreated.

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of peripheral facial nerve direct end-to-end anastomosis and/or nerve grafting surgery for patients with facial nerve injury after facial trauma.

Methods Fifty-nine patients with peripheral facial nerve paralysis after facial injuries underwent facial nerve rehabilitation surgery from November 2017 to December 2021 at Ho Chi Minh City National Hospital of Odontology.

Results All 59 cases of facial trauma with damage to the peripheral facial nerve underwent facial nerve reconstruction surgery within 8 weeks of the injury. Of these cases, 25/59 (42.3%) had end-to-end anastomosis, 22/59 (37.3%) had nerve grafting, and 12/59 (20.4%) had a combination of nerve grafting and end-to-end anastomosis. After surgery, the rates of moderate and good recovery were 78.4% and 11.8%, respectively. All facial paralysis measurements showed statistically significant improvement after surgery, including the Facial Nerve Grading Scale 2.0 (FNGS 2.0) score, the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) scale, and electroneurography. The rate of synkinesis after surgery was 34%. Patient follow-up postoperatively ranged from 6 to > 36 months; 51 out of 59 patients (86.4%) were followed-up for at least 12 months or longer.

Conclusion Nerve rehabilitation surgery including direct end-to-end anastomosis and nerve grafting is effective in cases of peripheral facial nerve injury following facial trauma. The surgery helps restore nerve conduction and improve facial paralysis.



Publication History

Received: 20 July 2023

Accepted: 16 January 2024

Article published online:
12 April 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Shahim FN, Cameron P, McNeil JJ. Maxillofacial trauma in major trauma patients. Aust Dent J 2006; 51 (03) 225-230
  • 2 Booth PW, Eppley B, Schmelzeisen R. Maxillofacial Trauma and Esthetic Facial Reconstruction. 2 ed.. Elsevier; 2011
  • 3 Khan T, Shah SA, Wahid A, Waraich RA. Peripheral nerve injury in maxillofacial trauma. J Head Neck Phys Surg 2015
  • 4 Kahn JB, Gliklich RE, Boyev KP, Stewart MG, Metson RB, McKenna MJ. Validation of a patient-graded instrument for facial nerve paralysis: the FaCE scale. Laryngoscope 2001; 111 (03) 387-398 DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200103000-00005.
  • 5 Haginomori S-I. An electrophysiological prognostic diagnosis for facial palsy. Auris Nasus Larynx 2022
  • 6 Vrabec JT, Backous DD, Djalilian HR. et al; Facial Nerve Disorders Committee. Facial Nerve Grading System 2.0. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 140 (04) 445-450 DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.12.031.
  • 7 Lam AQ, Tran Phan Chung T, Tran Viet L, Do Quang H, Tran Van D, Fox AJ. The Anatomic Landmark Approach to Extratemporal Facial Nerve Repair in Facial Trauma. Cureus 2022; 14 (03) e22787 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22787.
  • 8 Ghimire R. An unusual case of facial nerve palsy due to minor face trauma: A rare case report. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2021; 9: 20 50313X211031332
  • 9 Wang L, Shi H. Treatment of traumatic facial paralysis in a child with electroacupuncture and hyperbaric oxygen: A case report. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2022; 48: 101595
  • 10 MacKinnon SE. Nerve Surgery. Thieme; 2015
  • 11 Nam AJ, Davidson EH, Manson PN. 1.1–Assessment of the Patient With Traumatic Facial Injury. In: Dorafshar AH, Rodriguez ED, Manson PN. eds. Facial Trauma Surgery. Elsevier; 2020: 1-15
  • 12 Fliss E, Yanko R, Zaretski A. et al. Facial Nerve Repair following Acute Nerve Injury. Arch Plast Surg 2022; 49 (04) 501-509 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1751105.
  • 13 Sunderland S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain 1951; 74 (04) 491-516 DOI: 10.1093/brain/74.4.491.
  • 14 McElwee TJ, Poche JN, Sowder JC, Hetzler LT. Management of Acute Facial Nerve and Parotid Injuries. Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37 (04) 490-499
  • 15 Faramarzi M, Faramarzi A, Hosseinialhashemi M. Is Early Traumatic Facial Nerve Surgery a Priority during the COVID-19 Pandemic?. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 25 (02) e177-e178
  • 16 Volk GF, Pantel M, Guntinas-Lichius O. Modern concepts in facial nerve reconstruction. Head Face Med 2010; 6: 25 DOI: 10.1186/1746-160x-6-25.
  • 17 Brown S, Isaacson B, Kutz W, Barnett S, Rozen SM. Facial Nerve Trauma: Clinical Evaluation and Management Strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (05) 1498-1512 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000005572.
  • 18 Li L, Fan Z, Wang H, Han Y. Efficacy of surgical repair for the functional restoration of injured facial nerve. BMC Surg 2021; 21 (01) 32
  • 19 Hadlock TA, Cheney ML. Single-incision endoscopic sural nerve harvest for cross face nerve grafting. J Reconstr Microsurg 2008; 24 (07) 519-523 DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1088235.
  • 20 Osinga R, Buncke HJ, Buncke GM, Meuli-Simmen C. Subdivision of the sural nerve: step towards individual facial reanimation. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2011; 45 (01) 3-7 DOI: 10.3109/2000656X.2011.554693.
  • 21 Tường MT. Khảo sát di chứng sau cắt thần kinh hiển ngoài. Tạp Chí Y Học TP Hồ Chí Minh 2010; 2 (14) 6
  • 22 Hu M, Xiao H, Niu Y, Liu H, Zhang L. Long-Term Follow-Up of the Repair of the Multiple-Branch Facial Nerve Defect Using Acellular Nerve Allograft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74 (01) 218.e1-218.e11 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.08.005.
  • 23 Kannan RY, Hills A, Shelley MJ. et al. Immediate compared with late repair of extracranial branches of the facial nerve: a comparative study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 58 (02) 163-169
  • 24 Carré F, Hervochon R, Lahlou G. et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors of facial nerve repair: a retrospective comparative study of 31 patients and literature review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 279 (02) 1091-1097
  • 25 Rodríguez-Lorenzo A, Tzou C-HJ. Principles of Facial Nerve Reconstruction. In: Tzou C-HJ, Rodríguez-Lorenzo A. eds. Facial Palsy: Techniques for Reanimation of the Paralyzed Face. Springer International Publishing; 2021: 55-69