Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1785205
Functional Language in Children from a Public Cochlear Implant Program in a Developing Country
Funding The authors declare that they have received no funding from agencies in the public, private or non-profit sectors for the conduction of the present study.Abstract
Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that ∼ 32 million children worldwide are affected by hearing loss (HL). Cochlear implant is the first-line treatment for severe to profound sensorineural HL. It is considered one of the most successful prostheses developed to date.
Objective To evaluate the oral language development of pediatric patients with prelingual deafness implanted in a reference hospital for the treatment of HL in southern Brazil.
Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study with a review of medical records of patients undergoing cochlear implant surgery between January 2009 and December 2018. Language development was assessed by reviewing consultations with speech therapy professionals from the cochlear implant group.
Results A total of 152 children were included in the study. The mean age at cochlear implant surgery was of 41 months (standard deviation [SD]: ± 15). The patients were divided into six groups considering the type of language most used in their daily lives. We found that 36% of children use oral language as their primary form of communication. In a subanalysis, we observed that patients with developed or developing oral language had undergone cochlear implant surgery earlier than patients using Brazilian Sign Language (Língua Brasileira de Sinais, LIBRAS, in Portuguese) or those without developed language.
Conclusion The cochlear implant is a state-of-the-art technology that enables the re-establishment of the sense of hearing and the development of oral language. However, language development is a complex process known to present a critical period to properly occur. We still see many patients receiving late diagnosis and treatment, which implies a delay and, often, the impossibility of developing oral communication.
Level of Evidence Level 3 (cohort study).
Publication History
Received: 28 June 2022
Accepted: 30 January 2024
Article published online:
25 May 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 World Health Organization. World report on hearing. Accessed March 31, 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/world-report-on-hearing
- 2 Wang J, Sung V, Carew P. et al. Prevalence of Childhood Hearing Loss and Secular Trends: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acad Pediatr 2019; 19 (05) 504-514 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.01.010.
- 3 Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 1998; 102 (05) 1161-1171 DOI: 10.1542/peds.102.5.1161.
- 4 Lenarz T. [Cochlear Implant - State of the Art]. Laryngorhinootologie 2017; 96 (S 01): S123-S151 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-101812.
- 5 Faistauer M, Lang Silva A, Félix TM. et al. Etiology of early hearing loss in Brazilian children. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2022; 88 (Suppl 1, Suppl 1) S33-S41 DOI: 10.1016/J.BJORL.2021.02.012.
- 6 Albernaz PLM. History of cochlear implants. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2015; 81 (02) 124-125 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.12.006.
- 7 Ministério da Saúde. CnesWeb - Cadastro Nacional de Estabelecimentos de Saúde. Accessed November 7, 2021. http://cnes2.datasus.gov.br/Mod_Ind_Especialidades.asp?VEstado=00&VMun=00&VComp=00&VTerc=00&VServico=107&VClassificacao=005&VAmbu=&VAmbuSUS=1&VHosp=&VHospSUS=1
- 8 De Angelo TCS, Bevilacqua MC, Moret ALM. Percepção da fala em deficientes auditivos pré-linguais usuários de implante coclear. Pro Fono 2010; 22 (03) 275-280 DOI: 10.1590/S0104-56872010000300020.
- 9 de Meneses MS, Cardoso CC, Silva Ide C. Fatores que interferem no desempenho de usuários de implante coclear em testes de percepção de fala. Rev CEFAC 2014; 16 (01) 65-71 DOI: 10.1590/1982-0216201411512.
- 10 Comerlatto Mda S. Habilidades auditivas e de linguagem de crianças usuárias de implante coclear: análise dos marcadores clínicos de desenvolvimento. Published online May 23, 2016. doi: DOI: 10.11606/T.5.2016.tde-20052016-142644.
- 11 Sharma SD, Cushing SL, Papsin BC, Gordon KA. Hearing and speech benefits of cochlear implantation in children: A review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 133 (109984): 109984 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109984.
- 12 Geers AE, Nicholas JG. Enduring advantages of early cochlear implantation for spoken language development. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2013; 56 (02) 643-655 DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0347).
- 13 Park HJ, Lee JY, Yang CJ. et al. What Is the Sensitive Period to Initiate Auditory Stimulation for the Second Ear in Sequential Cochlear Implantation?. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39 (02) 177-183 DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001640.
- 14 Geers AE, Strube MJ, Tobey EA, Pisoni DB, Moog JS. Epilogue: factors contributing to long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in early childhood. Ear Hear 2011; 32 (01) 84S-92S DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e3181ffd5b5.
- 15 Naik AN, Varadarajan VV, Malhotra PS. Early pediatric Cochlear implantation: An update. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2021; 6 (03) 512-521 DOI: 10.1002/LIO2.574.
- 16 Semenov YR, Yeh ST, Seshamani M. et al; CDaCI Investigative Team. Age-dependent cost-utility of pediatric cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (04) 402-412 DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182772c66.
- 17 Paschoal MR, Cavalcanti HG, Ferreira MAF. Análise espacial e temporal da cobertura da triagem auditiva neonatal no Brasil (2008-2015). Cien Saude Colet 2017; 22 (11) 3615-3624 DOI: 10.1590/1413-812320172211.21452016.
- 18 Faistauer M, Silva AL, Dominguez DOR. et al. Does universal newborn hearing screening impact the timing of deafness treatment?. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2022; 98 (02) 147-154 DOI: 10.1016/J.JPED.2021.04.008.
- 19 Busa J, Harrison J, Chappell J. et al; American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics 2007; 120 (04) 898-921 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-2333.
- 20 Year 2019 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs. J Early Hear Detect Interv 2019; 4 (02) 1-44 DOI: 10.15142/fptk-b748.
- 21 Fitzpatrick EM, Ham J, Whittingham J. Pediatric Cochlear Implantation: Why Do Children Receive Implants Late?. Ear Hear 2015; 36 (06) 688-694 DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000184.
- 22 Silva JM, Yamada MO, Guedes EG, Moret ALM. Factors influencing the quality of life of children with cochlear implants. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2020; 86 (04) 411-418 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.01.004.
- 23 Black J, Hickson L, Black B. Defining and evaluating success in paediatric cochlear implantation–an exploratory study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 76 (09) 1317-1326 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.05.027.
- 24 Holzinger D, Dall M, Sanduvete-Chaves S, Saldaña D, Chacón-Moscoso S, Fellinger J. The Impact of Family Environment on Language Development of Children With Cochlear Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ear Hear 2020; 41 (05) 1077-1091 DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000852.
- 25 Kral A, Kronenberger WG, Pisoni DB, O'Donoghue GM. Neurocognitive factors in sensory restoration of early deafness: a connectome model. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15 (06) 610-621 DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00034-X.
- 26 Messersmith JJ, Entwisle L, Warren S, Scott M. Clinical practice guidelines: Cochlear implants. J Am Acad Audiol 2019; 30 (10) 827-844 DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.19088.