Mind the Gap: The Journey of Skull Base Specialties Toward Gender Parity

Abstract

Background There are increased efforts to promote gender diversity in skull base specialties.

Aims/Objectives This study seeks to evaluate changes within neurotology, rhinology, and skull base neurosurgery (SBNS) over the past decade.

Methods Information regarding fellows training in the past 10 years, current faculty members and fellowship directors, and grants and awards were extracted from the American Neurotology Society, American Rhinologic Society, and North American Skull Base Society Web sites, tabulated, and summarized. Chi-square analysis compared the proportional makeup of female fellows within related fields.

Results In the past decade in neurotology, men constituted 89 of 128 (69.53%) fellows, 132 of 170 (77.64%) faculty members, and 25 of 29 (86.2%) fellowship directors. Within rhinology, men constituted 211 of 279 (75.63%) fellows, 113 of 141 (80.14%) faculty members, and 32 of 35 (91.4%) fellowship directors. In SBNS programs, men constituted 94 of 105 (90%) fellows, 120 of 133 (90%) faculty members, and 43 of 44 (97.73%) fellowship directors. In neurotology fellowships, the proportion of women increased (12%, p = 0.06) from 2012–2017 to 2018–2022. Similarly, SBNS and rhinology had statistically insignificant increases of 4.28% (p = 0.86) and 8.70% (p = 0.87).

Conclusion The representation of women is consistent across all three skull base specialties. Although the overall number of women in each field is increasing, it changes slowly.

Significance The gender makeup across all three skull base specialties is similar.

Keywords

skull base - neurosurgery - neurotology - gender

Publication History

Received: 24 April 2024

Accepted: 06 October 2024

Article published online:
08 November 2024

• References

• 1 Wallis CJD, Jerath A, Coburn N. et al. Association of surgeon-patient sex concordance with postoperative outcomes. JAMA Surg 2022; 157 (02) 146-156
• 2 Satkunasivam R, Klaassen Z, Ravi B. et al. Relation between surgeon age and postoperative outcomes: a population-based cohort study. CMAJ 2020; 192 (15) E385-E392
• 3 Zhao C, Dowzicky P, Colbert L, Roberts S, Kelz RR. Race, gender, and language concordance in the care of surgical patients: a systematic review. Surgery 2019; 166 (05) 785-792
• 4 Wallis CJ, Ravi B, Coburn N, Nam RK, Detsky AS, Satkunasivam R. Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study. BMJ 2017; 359: j4366
• 5 Tsugawa Y, Jena AB, Figueroa JF, Orav EJ, Blumenthal DM, Jha AK. Comparison of hospital mortality and readmission rates for Medicare patients treated by male vs female physicians. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177 (02) 206-213
• 6 Wallis CJD, Jerath A, Aminoltejari K. et al. Surgeon sex and long-term postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing common surgeries. JAMA Surg 2023; 158 (11) 1185-1194
• 7 Kong M. On Heidis, Howards, and Hierarchies: gender gap in medicine. Front Pediatr 2022; 10: 901297
• 8 Colleges AoAM. Report on residents 2023 [cited April 27, 2023]. Accessed on April 27, 2023 at: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/students-residents/report/report-residents
• 9 James-McCarthy K, Brooks-McCarthy A, Walker DM. Stemming the ‘Leaky Pipeline’: an investigation of the relationship between work-family conflict and women's career progression in academic medicine. BMJ Lead 2022; 6 (02) 110-117
• 10 Hill JF, Yule A, Zurakowski D, Day CS. Residents' perceptions of sex diversity in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (19) e1441-e1446
• 11 Rao RD, Khatib ON, Agarwal A. Factors motivating medical students in selecting a career specialty: relevance for a robust orthopaedic pipeline. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2017; 25 (07) 527-535
• 12 Goosmann M, Williams AM, Grewal J, Patel J, Jones L, Yaremchuk KL. The importance of female mentors and safety in the workplace to female otolaryngology applicants when creating rank lists. Ear Nose Throat J 2021; x: 1455613211029805
• 13 Fairmont I, Farrell N, Johnson AP, Cabrera-Muffly C. Influence of gender and racial diversity on the otolaryngology residency match. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 162 (03) 290-295
• 14 Odell T, Toor H, Takayanagi A. et al. Gender disparity in academic neurosurgery. Cureus 2019; 11 (05) e4628
• 15 Lee A, Kuczmarska-Haas A, Dalwadi SM. et al. Family planning, fertility, and career decisions among female oncologists. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5 (10) e2237558
• 16 Schroeder JE, Zisk-Rony RY, Liebergall M. et al. Medical students' and interns' interest in orthopedic surgery: the gender factor. J Surg Educ 2014; 71 (02) 198-204
• 17 Waisbren SE, Bowles H, Hasan T. et al. Gender differences in research grant applications and funding outcomes for medical school faculty. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008; 17 (02) 207-214
• 18 Durham SR, Donaldson K, Grady MS, Benzil DL. Analysis of the 1990-2007 neurosurgery residency match: does applicant gender affect neurosurgery match outcome?. J Neurosurg 2018; 129 (02) 282-289
• 19 Lynch G, Nieto K, Puthenveettil S. et al. Attrition rates in neurosurgery residency: analysis of 1361 consecutive residents matched from 1990 to 1999. J Neurosurg 2015; 122 (02) 240-249
• 20 Garozzo D, Rispoli R, Graziano F. et al. Women in Neurosurgery: historical path to self-segregation and proposal for an integrated future. Front Surg 2022; 9: 908540
• 21 Zechmeister I, Winkler R, Mad P. Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for the cervical spine: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2011; 20 (02) 177-184
• 22 Eloy JA, Svider PF, Kovalerchik O, Baredes S, Kalyoussef E, Chandrasekhar SS. Gender differences in successful NIH grant funding in otolaryngology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 149 (01) 77-83
• 23 Pelley E, Carnes M. When a specialty becomes “women's work”: trends in and implications of specialty gender segregation in medicine. Acad Med 2020; 95 (10) 1499-1506
• 24 Renfrow JJ, Rodriguez A, Wilson TA, Germano IM, Abosch A, Wolfe SQ. Tracking career paths of Women in Neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 2018; 82 (04) 576-582
• 25 Epperson M, Gouveia CJ, Tabangin ME. et al. Female representation in otolaryngology leadership roles. Laryngoscope 2020; 130 (07) 1664-1669
• 26 Nathan AS, Chandrasekhar SS. Beyond the glass ceiling: achieving leadership equity for Women in Otolaryngology. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep 2023; 11 (02) 1-9
• 27 Osman NY, Gottlieb B. Mentoring across differences. MedEdPORTAL 2018; 14: 10743
• 28 Farlow JL, Mott NM, Standiford TC. et al. Sponsorship and negotiation for women otolaryngologists at midcareer: a content analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 168 (03) 384-391
• 29 Plonsker JH, Benzil D, Air EL, Woodrow S, Stippler M, Ben-Haim S. Gender equality in neurosurgery and strategic goals toward a more balanced workforce. Neurosurgery 2022; 90 (05) 642-647
• 30 Squazzoni F, Bravo G, Grimaldo F, García-Costa D, Farjam M, Mehmani B. Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals. PLoS One 2021; 16 (10) e0257919
• 31 Lopez SA, Svider PF, Misra P, Bhagat N, Langer PD, Eloy JA. Gender differences in promotion and scholarly impact: an analysis of 1460 academic ophthalmologists. J Surg Educ 2014; 71 (06) 851-859
• 32 Eloy JA, Svider P, Chandrasekhar SS. et al. Gender disparities in scholarly productivity within academic otolaryngology departments. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148 (02) 215-222
• 33 Reed DA, Enders F, Lindor R, McClees M, Lindor KD. Gender differences in academic productivity and leadership appointments of physicians throughout academic careers. Acad Med 2011; 86 (01) 43-47
• 34 Research BRIfM. BRIMR rankings of NIH funding in 2022 2022 [cited April 27, 2023]. Accessed on April 27, 2023 at: https://brimr.org/brimr-rankings-of-nih-funding-in-2022/