Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1804900
Assessment of Level of Satisfaction, Pain, and Postoperative Healing in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Clinic CO2 Laser Anal Skin Tag Resection with Topical and Injectable Local Anesthesia

Abstract
The use of CO2 lasers in surgical procedures is well-established in medicine; however, data are still scarce in coloproctology, especially regarding anal skin tags.
Objectives
To assess the degree of satisfaction, pain, and postoperative healing in patients undergoing outpatient clinic CO2 laser anal skin tag resection with topical and injectable local anesthesia and its complications.
Methods
Prospective collection of data on patients with anal skin tags operated at a private clinic in São Paulo with topical and injectable local anesthesia and use of CO2 laser. The need for intraoperative stitches, opioids, and corticosteroids was assessed, as well as patient satisfaction and level of pain based on the analogue pain scale.
Results
39 patients were evaluated, of whom 36 (92.3%) were women. The main complaint was aesthetics (51.2%).
The average healing time was 3.7 + 1.8 weeks, and the average pain was 2.4 + 2.7. Six patients required stitches due to bleeding, and the presence of stitches did not increase the healing time or the need for opioids.
One patient presented with bleeding in the 1st postoperative period and needed reintervention in a surgical facility, 2 presented with fissures, and 12 with residual skin tags. Thirty-eight patients were satisfied.
Conclusions
Anal skin tag resection with topical and injectable local anesthesia and CO2 laser is an effective and safe procedure at an outpatient level. Its advantages are low levels of postoperative pain, rapid healing, and low rates of serious complications with a high degree of patient satisfaction.
Keywords
CO2 Lasers - laser surgery - colorectal surgery - anus diseases - anal fissure - hemorrhoidal diseaseAuthors' Contributions
Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, data collection, analysis, interpretation, writing of the articles, and final version to be published. All authors agree and take responsibility for the content of this version of the manuscript to be published.
Approval by the Ethics Committee
CAAE (Ethical Appraisal Submission Certificate): 74822623.0.0000.5492
Publication History
Received: 13 June 2024
Accepted: 25 November 2024
Article published online:
12 March 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua Rego Freitas, 175, loja 1, República, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01220-010, Brazil
Aline Celeghini Rosa Vicente da Frota, Karla de Oliveira Araújo, Patricia Deffune Celeghini, Gustavo Figueiredo Lima, Daniella Pereira de la Cruz, Tercio de Campos. Assessment of Level of Satisfaction, Pain, and Postoperative Healing in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Clinic CO2 Laser Anal Skin Tag Resection with Topical and Injectable Local Anesthesia. Journal of Coloproctology 2025; 45: s00451804900.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1804900
-
References
- 1 Benini V, Ruffolo AF, Casiraghi A. et al New Innovations for the Treatment of Vulvovaginal Atrophy: An Up-to-Date Review. Medicina (Lithuania) 2022; 58 (06)
- 2 Florencio-Silva R, Simões RS, Girão JHRC, Carbonel AAF, Teixeira Cde P, Sasso Gda S. Tratamento da atrofia vaginal da mulher na pós-menopausa. Reproducao e Climaterio 2017; 32 (01) 43-47
- 3 Bizjak-Ogrinc U, Senčar S. Sutureless Laser Labiaplasty of Labia Minora. Sex Med 2021; 9 (05) 100406
- 4 Preti M, Vieira-Baptista P, Digesu GA. et al. The clinical role of LASER for vulvar and vaginal treatments in gynecology and female urology: An ICS/ISSVD best practice consensus document. Neurourol Urodyn 2019; 38 (03) 1009-1023
- 5 Bubna C, D'Hanens C, Ferreira K, Pasquini Neto R. Vieira F de A, Novellino AM de M. Use of laser and radiofrequency for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: do Brazilian women know it? / Laser e rádio frequência como opções terapêuticas na síndrome geniturinária da menopausa: as mulheres brasileiras conhecem?. Brazilian Journal of Health Review 2022; 5 (04) 13179-13188
- 6 Gaspar A, Brandi H, Gomez V, Luque D. Efficacy of Erbium:YAG laser treatment compared to topical estriol treatment for symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Lasers Surg Med 2017; 49 (02) 160-168
- 7 Harju J, Söderlund F, Yrjönen A, Santos A, Hermunen K. Pilonidal disease treatment by radial laser surgery (FiLaC™): The first Finnish experience. Scand J Surg 2021; 110 (04) 520-523
- 8 Dessily M, Charara F, Ralea S, Allé JL. Pilonidal sinus destruction with a radial laser probe: technique and first Belgian experience. Acta Chir Belg 2017; 117 (03) 164-168
- 9 De Carvalho AL, Filho EFA, De Alcantara RSM, Barreto Mda S. FILAC – Fistula – Tract laser closure: A sphincter-preserving procedure for the treatment of complex anal fistulas. J Coloproctol (Rio J) 2017; 37 (02) 160-162
- 10 Giamundo P, Esercizio L, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Valente M. Fistula-tract Laser Closure (FiLaC™): long-term results and new operative strategies. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19 (08) 449-453
- 11 Longchamp G, Liot E, Meyer J, Toso C, Buchs NC, Ris F. Non-excisional laser therapies for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review of the literature. Lasers Med Sci 2021; 36 (03) 485-496
- 12 Maloku H, Gashi Z, Lazovic R, Islami H, Juniku-Shkololli A. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty procedure vs open surgical hemorrhoidectomy: A trial comparing 2 treatments for hemorrhoids of third and fourth degree. Acta Inform Med 2014; 22 (06) 365-367
- 13 Olajide TO, Balogun OS, Bode CO, Atoyebi OA. Challenges and prospects of laser haemorrhoidoplasty in a low resource setting: The Luth experience. J West Afr Coll Surg 2023; 13 (03) 96-100
- 14 Yousefianzadeh O, Dehghani A, Kargar S, Nikfard M, Dehghan HR. . D S A D D A S D MEDICAL REVIEWS Systematic Review Minimally Invasive Laser Surgery vs. Common Techniques for Hemorrhoid Treatment: Technology Assessment. Published online 2023. doi:10.30491/IJMR.2023.410856.1263
- 15 Cengiz TB, Gorgun E. Hemorrhoids: A range of treatments. Cleve Clin J Med 2019; 86 (09) 612-620
- 16 Harvitkar RU, Gattupalli GB, Bylapudi SK. The Laser Therapy for Hemorrhoidal Disease: A Prospective Study. Cureus 2021; 13 (11) e19497
- 17 Alsisy A, Alkhateep Y, Salem I. Comparative study between intrahemorrhoidal diode laser treatment and Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Menoufia Med J 2019; 32 (02) 560
- 18 Chia YW, Darzi A, Speakman CTM, Hill ADK, Jameson JS, Henry MM. C Ol6 e/al Dmease CO2 Laser Haemorrhoidectomy-Does It Alter Anorectal Function or Decrease Pain Compared to Conventional Haemorrhoidectomy? Vol 10.; 1995
- 19 Iranmanesh B, Khalili M, Zartab H, Amiri R, Aflatoonian M. Laser therapy in cutaneous and genital warts: A review article. Dermatol Ther 2021; 34 (01) e14671
- 20 Close S. PILONIDAL CYSTS: AN ANALYSIS OF SURGICAL FAILURES* A
- 21 Pandini LC, Nahas SC, Nahas CSR, Marques CFS, Sobrado CW, Kiss DR. Surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease with CO2 laser and Milligan-Morgan cold scalpel technique. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8 (07) 592-595
- 22 Yeo D, Tan KY. Hemorrhoidectomy - making sense of the surgical options. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20 (45) 16976-16983
- 23 de Freitas MOS, Santos JAD, Figueiredo MFS, Sampaio CA. Analysis of the main surgical techniques for hemorrhoids. J Coloproctol (Rio J) 2016; 36 (02) 104-114