Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1805197
Learning curve assessment of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for inexperienced centers by supervised-training: A Multicenter prospective study (GESICA project)
Authors
Aims The standardized introduction of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) with supervised mentoring during initial cases could improve the learning curve while minimizing technical and safety-related issues.
Aims: To evaluate the impact of a training model on the learning curve for EUS-GE in inexperienced centers in terms of procedure time, technical incidents and safety [1] [2] [3].
Methods Prospective, multicenter clinical study with two parallel, non-randomized groups to analyse a teaching model (online session; teaching material; direct online tutoring) in the first EUS-GE cases. Inclusion criteria: antrum-duodenal stenoses with preserved lumen patency or complete lumen obstruction but tutorable with guidewire (allowing oroenteral catheter placement and enterography). Exclusion criteria: absolute stenosis (not tutorable with guidewire), massive ascites, gastric linitis. Intervention group: procedures performed by endoscopists with no experience in EUS-GE. Control group: Autonomous procedures by the principal investigator. Learning curve assessed by CUSUM analysis. NCT-05128604.
Results From May 2021 to October 2024, 191 patients were screened, and 152 were included (Intervention: 122, Control: 30). Pancreatic adenocarcinoma was the most common cause of obstruction (54% of cases). Obstruction localization: antrum-duodenal bulb (55%). Baseline GOOS:≤1 (97%). Overall results: technical and clinical success 96% and 93% respectively; adverse events (AE) 8%; total procedure time 53 min (SD 24). Comparative results (Intervention vs. Control group): technical / clinical success: 97% vs 100% / 94% vs 100% (n.s) respectively; AE 3% vs 9% (n.s); procedure time 56 min vs 43 min (p<0.01). Only three patients in the intervention group (3%) experienced LAMS malposition (distal flange) requiring endoscopic closure or a second EUS-GE attempt. No technical incidents associated any adverse events or needing for interventional rescue as NOTEs. CUSUM curve analysis: stable procedure time reduction achieved after 11-13 procedures.
Conclusions Preliminary results suggest this training model facilitates the successful introduction of EUS-GE, achieving high technical and clinical success while minimizing technical failures and avoiding major adverse events. Procedure time stabilizes after 11-13 cases.
Publication History
Article published online:
27 March 2025
© 2025. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Tyberg A, Kats D, Choi A, Gaidhane M, Nieto J, Kahaleh M.. Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Gastroenterostomy: What Is the Learning Curve?. J Clin Gastroenterol 2021; 55 (08): 691-693
- 2 Jovani M, Ichkhanian Y, Parsa N. et al. Assessment of the learning curve for EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for a single operator. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93 (05): 1088-1093
- 3 Teoh AYB, Lakhtakia S, Tarantino I. et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy versus uncovered duodenal metal stenting for unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction (DRA-GOO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9 (02): 124-132