Endoscopy 2025; 57(S 02): S365
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1805914
Abstracts | ESGE Days 2025
ePosters

Esophageal Stents: Is Fluoroscopy Necessary?

L Relvas
1   ULS Algarve – Hospital de Faro, Faro, Portugal
,
T Gago
1   ULS Algarve – Hospital de Faro, Faro, Portugal
,
S Barros
1   ULS Algarve – Hospital de Faro, Faro, Portugal
,
I Carvalho
1   ULS Algarve – Hospital de Faro, Faro, Portugal
,
M Portugal
1   ULS Algarve – Hospital de Faro, Faro, Portugal
,
F Velasco
1   ULS Algarve – Hospital de Faro, Faro, Portugal
,
B Peixe
1   ULS Algarve – Hospital de Faro, Faro, Portugal
› Author Affiliations
 

Aims Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are used in the treatment of various esophageal conditions, such as strictures, perforations, and fistulas. They can be placed under fluoroscopic guidance (FG), endoscopic guidance (EG), or a combination of both. However, few studies directly compare these approaches. To assess and compare the safety and feasibility of SEMS placement under FG and EG, based on the experience of our institution.

Methods This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent esophageal SEMS placement between January 2011 and December 2023. Stents were placed either with fluoroscopic support or under direct endoscopic visualization. Data were collected regarding immediate/early complications (< 1 month post-insertion) and late complications (> 1 month post-insertion).

Results A total of 103 patients who underwent 114 SEMS placement procedures were included. The main indications were malignant esophageal stricture (90%), tracheoesophageal fistula (5.8%), and malignant extrinsic compression (2.9%). The majority of patients were male (78.6%) with an average age of 69.4 years. SEMS placement was performed under FG in 60 patients and EG in 43. Early complications occurred in 10.7% of patients in the FG group and 11.7% in the EG group (p=0.36). The most common complications were pain, vomiting, malposition/migration, bleeding, and dysphagia. Late complications were recorded in 6.8% of patients in the FG group and 11.7% in the EG group (p=0.67), including tumor invasion/growth, stent migration, esophageal fistulas, and food impaction [1].

Conclusions SEMS placement under fluoroscopic and endoscopic guidance is safe and accurate, with no statistically significant differences in complication rates between the two approaches. Both techniques are effective in treating malignant esophageal strictures and other conditions.



Publication History

Article published online:
27 March 2025

© 2025. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany