Endoscopy 2025; 57(S 02): S511
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806324
Abstracts | ESGE Days 2025
ePosters

Single frame workflow recognition during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using artificial intelligence (AI)

M W Scheppach
1   University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
D Weber Nunes
2   Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule (OTH) Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
,
X Arizi
1   University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
D Rauber
2   Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule (OTH) Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
,
A Probst
1   University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
S Nagl
1   University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
C Römmele
1   University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
C Palm
2   Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule (OTH) Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
,
H Messmann
1   University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
,
A Ebigbo
1   University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
 

Aims Precise surgical phase recognition and evaluation may improve our understanding of complex endoscopic procedures. Furthermore, quality control measurements and endoscopy training could benefit from objective descriptions of surgical phase distributions. Therefore, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence algorithm for frame-by-frame operational phase recognition during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

Methods Full length ESD-videos from 31 patients comprising 6.297.782 single images were collected retrospectively. Videos were annotated on a frame-by-frame basis for the operational macro-phases diagnostics, marking, injection, dissection and bleeding. Further subphases were the application of electrical current, visible injection of fluid into the submucosal space and scope manipulation, leading to 11 phases in total. 4.975.699 frames (21 patients) were used for training of a video swin transformer using uniform frame sampling for temporal information. Hyperparameter tuning was performed with 897.325 further frames (6 patients), while 424.758 frames (4 patients) were used for validation.

Results The overall F1 scores on the test dataset for the macro-phases and all 11 phases were 0.96 and 0.90, respectively. The recall values for diagnostics, marking, injection, dissection and bleeding were 1.00, 1.00, 0.95, 0.96 and 0.93, respectively.

Conclusions The algorithm classified operational phases during ESD with high accuracy. A precise evaluation of phase distribution may allow for the development of objective quality metrics for quality control and training.



Publication History

Article published online:
27 March 2025

© 2025. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany