Endoscopy 2025; 57(S 02): S571-S572
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806497
Abstracts | ESGE Days 2025
ePosters

Case Series: Success of Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy (E-VAC) with Budget-Friendly Devices in Upper GI Complications

Authors

  • B Pardo

    1   Sanatorio Dr. Julio Méndez, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • G Lombardi

    2   Sanatorio julio Mendez, Capital Federal, Argentina
  • M Daca-Alvarez

    3   Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • A Sequeira

    4   Hospital Privado de la Comunidad, Mar del Plata, Argentina
  • X Taype

    5   Sanatorio Julio Méndez, Capital federal Argentina
  • R Escobar

    1   Sanatorio Dr. Julio Méndez, Buenos Aires, Argentina
 

An adapted version of endoscopic vacuum therapy (E-VAC), termed "low-cost VAC," is made using gauze or an open-pore sponge covered with perforated sterile plastic. We present a case series of five patients with various presentations of postoperative leaks and fistulas treated with the "low-cost VAC" method: 1) A 67-year-old female with squamous cell carcinoma underwent esophagectomy. Postoperatively, she developed a complex fistula (esophagus-pleuro-mediastinal-cutaneous). E-VAC therapy required five placements and replacements, leading to complete closure after 50 days. A complication of esophageal stenosis was resolved with balloon dilation. 2) A 77-year-old male with esophageal adenocarcinoma had esophagogastric anastomosis dehiscence. A mega-stent and E-VAC device were placed, resulting in successful closure after 75 days. 3) A 60-year-old female experienced extensive gastric suture dehiscence after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma. E-VAC therapy achieved closure with two placements in 46 days. 4) A 61-year-old male with gastric adenocarcinoma had esophageal-jejunal anastomosis dehiscence. E-VAC therapy closed the defect with one placement in 15 days. 5) A 59-year-old male with gastric neuroendocrine tumors underwent total gastrectomy and developed multiple esophageal-jejunal anastomosis dehiscences. E-VAC therapy closed the defects with two placements over 30 days [1].

This technique is feasible, cost-effective, and readily available, providing results comparable to other drainage systems. It serves as a validated option where access to commercial devices is limited.



Publication History

Article published online:
27 March 2025

© 2025. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany