Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806524
Endoscopic Management of post-Esophagectomy De-layed-Gastric-Conduit-Emptying (DGCE): results from a Cohort Study in a Tertiary Referral Center with Comparison Between Procedures
Authors
Aims Delayed Gastric Conduit Emptying (DGCE) occurs in 15–39% of patients who underwent esophagectomy. Intra-Pyloric Injection of Botulinum Toxin (IPBT), Pneumatic Balloon Dilation (PBD), and the same session combination (BTPD), represent the main endoscopic procedures, but comparative data are currently unavailable [1].
Methods We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data on all consecutive patients with DGCE treated endoscopically with IPBT, PBD, or BTPD. ISDE Diagnostic Criteria were used for DGCE diagnosis and classification. Gastric Outlet Obstruction Score was used for clinical staging. All patients undergoing IPBT received 100 UI of toxin, while those undergoing PBD were dilated up to 20mm. Clinical success (CS) was defined as the resolution of symptoms/resumption of feeding at discharge or expanding dietary intake at any rate. Recurrence was defined as symptom relapse after more than 15 days of well-being requiring endoscopic/surgical intervention.
Results 64 patients (81.2% male, 90.6% Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, 77.4% adenocarcinoma), median age 62 years (IQR 55-70), were enrolled: 18 (28.1%) in the IPBT group, 24 (37.5%) in the PBD group and 22 (34.4%) in the BTPD group. No statistically significant differences were found in the baseline characteristics, surgical techniques, and median follow-up among the three groups. BTPD showed a higher CS rate (100%) compared to the PD and BTPD groups (p=0.02) and Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test revealed that the BTPD group was associated both with a significatively shorter mean time to refeed of 1.16 days (95% CI 0.8-1.5; p=0.001) and a shorter median time to discharge of 1 day (95% CI 1-3; p=0.0001).
Conclusions Endoscopic management of DGCE remains challenging. Waiting for further strong evidence, BTPD can offer patients a higher clinical efficacy rate and a shorter time to refeed and be discharged.
Publication History
Article published online:
27 March 2025
© 2025. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Konradsson M., van Berge Henegouwen M.I., Bruns C., Chaudry M.A., Cheong E., Cuesta M.A., Darling G.E., Gisbertz S.S., Griffin S.M., Gutschow C.A., van Hillegersberg R., Hofstetter W., Hölscher A.H., Kitagawa Y., van Lanschot J.J.B., Lindblad M., Ferri L.E., Low D.E., Luyer M.D.P., Ndegwa N., Nilsson M.. Diagnostic criteria and symptom grading for delayed gastric conduit emptying after esophagectomy for cancer: international expert consensus based on a modified Delphi process. Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus 2020; 33 (4): doz074
