Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806752
Review Article

Role of the Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) Meetings in Rectal Cancer Management

Ajith John 
1   Department of Surgery Unit 2 (Colorectal Surgery), Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Rohin Mittal
1   Department of Surgery Unit 2 (Colorectal Surgery), Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The management of rectal cancer is complex and requires the expertise of multiple disciplines and various treatment modalities. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussions are essential for the optimal management of patients with rectal cancer.

An effective MDT is composed of core members from all treating specialities. A specialized radiologist plays a crucial role within the MDT. They are vital to the staging of cancer and the identification of poor prognostic features. Their input is key in planning treatment, including the type and extent of surgery and any neoadjuvant treatment.

MDTs must allocate sufficient time for members to prepare for the MDT and adequate time to discuss each case. A final plan of treatment is agreed upon by all attending members and well documented. The patient's care is discussed at multiple points following each treatment modality throughout the cancer treatment journey. Any changes in treatment are rediscussed at the MDT.

MDTs have demonstrated the ability to standardize care, leading to improved outcomes. MDTs also improve technical aspects of treatment, such as the quality of surgery and negative margins. These improvements are reflected in improved patient outcomes, including reduced recurrence rates and improved survival.

Keywords

conference - multidisciplinary - rectal cancer - team


Publication History

Article published online:
01 April 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Wright FC, De Vito C, Langer B, Hunter A. Expert Panel on Multidisciplinary Cancer Conference Standards. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer 2007; 43 (06) 1002-1010
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Taylor C, Shewbridge A, Harris J, Green JS. Benefits of multidisciplinary teamwork in the management of breast cancer. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) 2013; 5: 79-85
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Walraven JEW, van der Hel OL, van der Hoeven JJM, Lemmens VEPP, Verhoeven RHA, Desar IME. Factors influencing the quality and functioning of oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: results of a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22 (01) 829
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Effects of a multidisciplinary team on colorectal cancer treatment - ScienceDirect [Internet]. Accessed October 25, 2024 at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1682606×/215000894?via%3Dihub
  • 5 MacDermid E, Hooton G, MacDonald M. et al. Improving patient survival with the colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11 (03) 291-295
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Richardson B, Preskitt J, Lichliter W. et al. The effect of multidisciplinary teams for rectal cancer on delivery of care and patient outcome: has the use of multidisciplinary teams for rectal cancer affected the utilization of available resources, proportion of patients meeting the standard of care, and does this translate into changes in patient outcome?. Am J Surg 2016; 211 (01) 46-52
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Jeon SK, Kim SH, Shin CI. et al. Role of dedicated subspecialized radiologists in multidisciplinary team discussions on lower gastrointestinal tract cancers. Korean J Radiol 2022; 23 (07) 732-741
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Davison AG, Eraut CD, Haque AS. et al. Telemedicine for multidisciplinary lung cancer meetings. J Telemed Telecare 2004; 10 (03) 140-143
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Sievers CK, Kratz JD, Zurbriggen LD. et al. The multidisciplinary management of colorectal cancer: present and future paradigms. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2016; 29 (03) 232-238
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Tran TH, de Boer J, Gyorki DE, Krishnasamy M. Optimising the quality of multidisciplinary team meetings: a narrative review. Cancer Med 2022; 11 (09) 1965-1971
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Lamb BW, Brown KF, Nagpal K, Vincent C, Green JSA, Sevdalis N. Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18 (08) 2116-2125
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Jung SM, Hong YS, Kim TW. et al. Impact of a multidisciplinary team approach for managing advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer. World J Surg 2018; 42 (07) 2227-2233
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Dew K, Stubbe M, Signal L. et al. Cancer care decision making in multidisciplinary meetings. Qual Health Res 2015; 25 (03) 397-407
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Horvat N, Carlos Tavares Rocha C, Clemente Oliveira B, Petkovska I, Gollub MJ. MRI of rectal cancer: tumor staging, imaging techniques, and management. Radiographics 2019; 39 (02) 367-387
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Burton S, Brown G, Daniels IR, Norman AR, Mason B, Cunningham D. Royal Marsden Hospital, Colorectal Cancer Network. MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?. Br J Cancer 2006; 94 (03) 351-357
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Taylor FGM, Quirke P, Heald RJ. et al; Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rectal Cancer European Equivalence Study Study Group. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of circumferential resection margin predicts disease-free survival and local recurrence: 5-year follow-up results of the MERCURY study. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32 (01) 34-43
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Kalisz KR, Enzerra MD, Paspulati RM. MRI evaluation of the response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Radiographics 2019; 39 (02) 538-556
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Sugarbaker PH, Jelinek JS. The radiologist's role in the multidisciplinary team for patients with colon cancer peritoneal metastases. Surg Oncol 2022; 40: 101690
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Tsai LL, Masciocchi M, Arora SS, Kielar AZ. Role of the radiologist at HCC multidisciplinary conference and use of the LR-TR algorithm for improving workflow. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46 (08) 3558-3564
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Neri E, Gabelloni M, Bäuerle T. et al. Involvement of radiologists in oncologic multidisciplinary team meetings: an international survey by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging. Eur Radiol 2021; 31 (02) 983-991
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Snelgrove RC, Subendran J, Jhaveri K. et al. Effect of multidisciplinary cancer conference on treatment plan for patients with primary rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58 (07) 653-658
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Patkar V, Acosta D, Davidson T, Jones A, Fox J, Keshtgar M. Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: evidence, challenges, and the role of clinical decision support technology. Int J Breast Cancer 2011; 2011: 831605
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Chang KH, Smith MJ, McAnena OJ, Aprjanto AS, Dowdall JF. Increased use of multidisciplinary treatment modalities adds little to the outcome of rectal cancer treated by optimal total mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27 (10) 1275-1283
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Taylor C, Munro AJ, Glynne-Jones R. et al. Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence?. BMJ 2010; 340: c951
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Obias VJ, Reynolds Jr HL. Multidisciplinary teams in the management of rectal cancer. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2007; 20 (03) 143-147
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Munro A, Brown M, Niblock P, Steele R, Carey F. Do multidisciplinary team (MDT) processes influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer? A population-based experience. BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 686
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Jalil R, Ahmed M, Green JS, Sevdalis N. Factors that can make an impact on decision-making and decision implementation in cancer multidisciplinary teams: an interview study of the provider perspective. Int J Surg 2013; 11 (05) 389-394
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Macaskill EJ, Thrush S, Walker EM, Dixon JM. Surgeons' views on multi-disciplinary breast meetings. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42 (07) 905-908
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Lamb BW, Sevdalis N, Arora S, Pinto A, Vincent C, Green JS. Teamwork and team decision-making at multidisciplinary cancer conferences: barriers, facilitators, and opportunities for improvement. World J Surg 2011; 35 (09) 1970-1976
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Sarkar S, Arora S, Lamb BW, Green JSA, Sevdalis N, Darzi A. Case review in urology multidisciplinary team meetings: what members think of its functioning. J Clin Urol 2014; 7 (06) 394-402
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 31 Lanceley A, Savage J, Menon U, Jacobs I. Influences on multidisciplinary team decision-making. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18 (02) 215-222
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Basta YL, Bolle S, Fockens P, Tytgat KMAJ. The value of multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24 (09) 2669-2678
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Kelly MJ, Lloyd TDR, Marshall D, Garcea G, Sutton CD, Beach M. A snapshot of MDT working and patient mapping in the UK colorectal cancer centres in 2002. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5 (06) 577-581
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar