Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology 2025; 08(02): 140-145
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809317
Original Article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment Restaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rectal Cancer in the Era of Total Neoadjuvant Treatment

1   Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Karthigaiselvi Murugesan
2   Department of Radiology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
3   Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Pradeep Jeyakumar
1   Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Shirley Sundersingh
4   Department of Oncopathology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
› Author Affiliations

Funding None.
Preview

Abstract

Introduction

The diagnostic accuracy of a restaging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), especially total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT), is not well established. We aimed to study the diagnostic accuracy of the restaging MRI after NAT including TNT.

Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary cancer center of patients undergoing radical surgery after various types of NAT for rectal cancer between 2020 and 2023. The patients were grouped according to the type of NAT received. The findings on the restaging MRI were correlated with the gold standard of the histopathology report of the resected specimen to estimate its diagnostic accuracy overall as well as for the different types of NAT.

Results

Among the 131 patients included in this study, 68% received TNT. The restaging MRI showed an overall accuracy of 74.4% for T-stage and 60.1% for N-stage and overestimated the T- and N-stage in 20.6 and 12.2% of patients and underestimated them in 41.2 and 47.3% patients, respectively. MRI had a higher accuracy for T-stage among patients who did not receive TNT compared with those who received it (79.6 vs. 75.2%) but not for N-stage or CRM involvement. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the restaging MRI for CRM involvement were 74.1, 73, 26.8, 95.5, and 74%, respectively.

Conclusion

We found a moderate level of accuracy for posttreatment MRI in predicting the pathological stage and a high NPV in determining an involved CRM. Use of TNT reduced the diagnostic accuracy of restaging MRI for T-stage but not for N-stage or predicting CRM involvement. Further studies are required to assess the diagnostic accuracy of posttreatment MRI after different regimens of NAT that are currently recommended in rectal cancer.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Article published online:
30 May 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India