Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809929
Comparative Analysis of Endoscopic and Microscopic Myringoplasty
Authors
Funding The authors declare that they did not receive funding from agencies in the public, private, or non-profit sectors to conduct the present study.
Abstract
Introduction
Myringoplasty is a surgical procedure aimed at reconstructing the tympanic membrane, restoring acoustic protection to the round window, and improving sound conduction to enhance hearing, and prevent recurrent infections or otorrhea. This procedure can be performed either through microscopy or endoscopy.
Objective
To compare the outcomes of endoscopic myringoplasty and microscopic myringoplasty.
Methods
Data were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical records of patients who underwent myringoplasty either through microscopy or videoendoscopy at Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo (HSPE) between December 2015 and December 2020. We evaluated the therapeutic success rate, defined as tympanic membrane closure, the variation in the pre- and postoperative speech recognition threshold (SRT), and the incidence of immediate and late complications in each group.
Results
We included 118 patients: 64 underwent microscopic myringoplasty (group 1) and 54, videoendoscopic myringoplasty (group 2). The groups were comparable in terms of mean age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). The surgical success rates were similar between the 2 groups: group 1: 70.3%; and group 2: 75.9% (p = 0.494). Group 1 presented a significant improvement in the mean postoperative hearing thresholds (30.0 ± 14.9) compared to the mean preoperative levels (41.0 ± 16.3) (p < 0.001), while group 2 did not present a statistically significant improvement (from 37.8 ± 14.7 preoperatively to 32.0 ± 20.7 postoperatively; p = 0.284).
Conclusion
Microscopic and endoscopic myringoplasty yielded similar tympanic membrane closure rates. However, the videoendoscopic procedures resulted in lower SRT reduction, while the microscopic procedures resulted in a higher rate of immediate postoperative complications.
Level Of Evidence
3
Authors' Contributions
GdSM: literature review, data collection, study design, and writing; RPCSD: data collection and writing; and FCN and CV: literature review, study design, and writing. All authors read and approved of the final manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the authors upon reasonable request.
ORCID IDs
Gabriel de Souza Mares – https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5597-4748
Raquel Pinto Coelho Souza Dias – https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2619-5497
Felipe Costa Neiva – https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1161-3833
Cidia Vasconcellos – https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-1084
Publication History
Received: 11 October 2024
Accepted: 03 May 2025
Article published online:
07 October 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua Rego Freitas, 175, loja 1, República, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01220-010, Brazil
Gabriel Souza Mares, Raquel Pinto Coelho Souza Dias, Felipe Costa Neiva, Cidia Vasconcellos. Comparative Analysis of Endoscopic and Microscopic Myringoplasty. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2025; 29: s00451809929.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809929
-
References
- 1 Costa Sd. , Rosito LPS. Otites médias crônicas. In: Pignatari SSN, Anselmo-Lima WT, editors. Tratado de otorrinolaringologia. 3rd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2018. . p. 128-149
- 2 Morris PS, Leach AJ. Acute and chronic otitis media. Pediatr Clin North Am 2009; 56 (06) 1383-1399
- 3 Avnstorp MB, Homøe P, Bjerregaard P, Jensen RG. Chronic suppurative otitis media, middle ear pathology and corresponding hearing loss in a cohort of Greenlandic children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 83: 148-153
- 4 Brar S, Watters C, Winters R. Tympanoplasty. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565863/
- 5 Azevedo AFd, Pinto DCG, Souza NJAd, Greco DB, Gonçalves DU. Sensorineural hearing loss in chronic suppurative otitis media with and without cholesteatoma. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 73 (05) 671-674
- 6 Dolhi N, Weimer AD. Tympanic Membrane Perforations. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557887/
- 7 Bluestone CD. Recent advances in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of otitis media. Pediatr Clin North Am 1981; 28 (04) 727-755
- 8 Sheehy JL, Anderson RG. Myringoplasty. A review of 472 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1980; 89 (4 Pt 1): 331-334
- 9 Dündar R, Kulduk E, Soy FK, Aslan M, Hanci D, Muluk NB, Cingi C. Endoscopic versus microscopic approach to type 1 tympanoplasty in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 78 (07) 1084-1089
- 10 Glasscock III ME, Jackson CG, Nissen AJ, Schwaber MK. Postauricular undersurface tympanic membrane grafting: a follow-up report. Laryngoscope 1982; 92 (7 Pt 1): 718-727
- 11 Tseng CC, Lai MT, Wu CC, Yuan SP, Ding YF. Comparison of the efficacy of endoscopic tympanoplasty and microscopic tympanoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (08) 1890-1896
- 12 Hardman J, Muzaffar J, Nankivell P, Coulson C. Tympanoplasty for Chronic Tympanic Membrane Perforation in Children: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol 2015; 36 (05) 796-804
- 13 Tarabichi M. Endoscopic middle ear surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999; 108 (01) 39-46
- 14 Tarabichi M, Ayache S, Nogueira JF, Al Qahtani M, Pothier DD. Endoscopic management of chronic otitis media and tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2013; 46 (02) 155-163
- 15 Kozin ED, Gulati S, Kaplan AB, Lehmann AE, Remenschneider AK, Landegger LD. et al. Systematic review of outcomes following observational and operative endoscopic middle ear surgery. Laryngoscope 2015; 125 (05) 1205-1214
- 16 Bianchini AJ, Berlitz VG, Mocelin AG, Ribeiro JF, Keruk JG, Hamerschmidt R. Endoscopic or Microscopic Tympanoplasty Advantages and Disadvantages: A Theory Domain Systematic Review. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 27 (03) e528-e535
- 17 Awad OGA-N, Hamid KA. Endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients using tragal cartilage. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 141 (06) 532-538
- 18 Shakya D, Kc A, Nepal A. A Comparative Study of Endoscopic versus Microscopic Cartilage Type I Tympanoplasty. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 24 (01) e80-e85
- 19 Nassif N, Berlucchi M, De Zinis LOR. Tympanic membrane perforation in children: Endoscopic type I tympanoplasty, a newly technique, is it worthwhile?. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 79 (11) 1860-1864
- 20 Tan HE, Maria PLS, Eikelboom RH, Anandacoomaraswamy KS, Atlas MD. Type I Tympanoplasty Meta-Analysis. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (07) 838-846
- 21 Hsu Y-C, Kuo C-L, Huang T-C. A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 47 (01) 44
- 22 Lakpathi G, Reddy LS. Anand. Comparative Study of Endoscope Assisted Myringoplasty and Microscopic Myringoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 68 (02) 185-190
- 23 El-Guindy A. Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 1992; 106 (06) 493-495
- 24 Palva T, Virtanen H. Pitfalls in myringoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol 1982; 93 (5-6): 441-446
- 25 Pontes-Madruga TC, Nogueira Neto FB, Suzuki FAB, Testa JRG, Onishi ET. Endoscopic tympanoplasty with inlay cartilage graft in an university hospital. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 87 (04) 434-439
- 26 Li B, Asche S, Yang R, Yueh B, Fina M. Outcomes of Adopting Endoscopic Tympanoplasty in an Academic Teaching Hospital. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2019; 128 (06) 548-555
- 27 Lyons SA, Su T, Vissers LET, Peters JPM, Smit AL, Grolman W. Fascia compared to one-piece composite cartilage-perichondrium grafting for tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 2016; 126 (07) 1662-1670
- 28 Yang T, Wu X, Peng X, Zhang Y, Xie S, Sun H. Comparison of cartilage graft and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Otolaryngol 2016; 136 (11) 1085-1090
- 29 Zhang ZG, Huang QH, Zheng YQ, Sun W, Chen Y. Bin; Si, Y. Three Autologous Substitutes for Myringoplasty. Otol Neurotol 2011; 32 (08) 1234-1238
- 30 Mohamad SH, Khan I, Hussain SSM. Is cartilage tympanoplasty more effective than fascia tympanoplasty? A systematic review. Otol Neurotol 2012; 33 (05) 699-705
- 31 Demirpehlivan IA, Onal K, Arslanoglu S, Songu M, Ciger E, Can N. Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 268 (03) 471-474
- 32 Yegin Y, Çelik M, Koç AK, Küfeciler L, Elbistanlı MS, Kayhan FT. Comparison of temporalis fascia muscle and full-thickness cartilage grafts in type 1 pediatric tympanoplasties. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 82 (06) 695-701
- 33 Jalali MM, Motasaddi M, Kouhi A, Dabiri S, Soleimani R. Comparison of cartilage with temporalis fascia tympanoplasty: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (09) 2139-2148
- 34 Becvarovski Z, Kartush JM. Smoking and tympanoplasty: implications for prognosis and the Middle Ear Risk Index (MERI). Laryngoscope 2001; 111 (10) 1806-1811
- 35 Salviz M, Bayram O, Bayram AA, Balikci HH, Chatzi T, Paltura C, Ozkul MH. Prognostic factors in type I tympanoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx 2015; 42 (01) 20-23
- 36 Visvanathan V, Vallamkondu V, Bhimrao SK. What Effect Does Smoking Have on the Surgical Closure of Tympanic Membrane Perforations? A Review. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39 (10) 1217-1221
- 37 Era P, Jokela J, Qvarnberg Y, Heikkinen E. Pure-tone thresholds, speech understanding, and their correlates in samples of men of different ages. Audiology 1986; 25 (06) 338-352
- 38 Onal K, Uguz MZ, Kazikdas KC, Gursoy ST, Gokce H. A multivariate analysis of otological, surgical and patient-related factors in determining success in myringoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol 2005; 30 (02) 115-120
- 39 Dornhoffer J. Cartilage tympanoplasty: indications, techniques, and outcomes in a 1,000-patient series. Laryngoscope 2003; 113 (11) 1844-1856
- 40 Gulsen S, Baltacı A. Comparison of endoscopic transcanal and microscopic approach in Type 1 tympanoplasty. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 87 (02) 157-163

