Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1810029
Acoustic Changes in Voicemail Transmission Induced by Mobile Phones
Authors
Funding The author declares that no funding was received for this work.

Abstract
Introduction
Given the widespread use of mobile phones for voice communication, a comprehensive understanding of the objective acoustic alterations in voicemail transmission is lacking, motivating this investigation into voice quality changes.
Objective
This study aims to explore the objective changes in voice recordings caused by mobile phones and voicemail applications during the transmission process, specifically focusing on the alterations to voice quality that occur during this process.
Methods
A volunteer sample of 45 healthy male hospital employees, with an average age of 36.7 ± 7.5 (ranging from 22 to 50), in a tertiary referral center were included in this study. The Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (Kay Elemetrics, Lincoln Park, NJ, USA) was employed to compare a set of nine parameters derived from sustained vowel phonations of /a/, encompassing free-field voice and mobile phone voicemail recordings. Average fundamental frequency (Fo), frequency perturbation parameters [Pitch Period Perturbation Quotient (PPQ), Relative Average Perturbation (RAP)], amplitude perturbation parameters [Shimmer in dB (ShdB), Shimmer Percent (Shim), Amplitude Perturbation Quotient (APQ)], noise parameters [Noise-to-Harmonic Ratio (NHR)] were calculated.
Results
Analysis of the patient data revealed that fundamental frequency (Fo) was resistant to alterations of voice (p = 0,313). Frequency perturbation parameters (PPQ, RAP) were impacted (p = 0.018, 0.020 respectively), however, amplitude perturbation parameters (ShdB, Shim, APQ) and noise parameter (NHR) were much more affected in voice transmission caused by mobile phones (p < 0,001 in all).
Conclusion
The findings of this study indicate that mobile phones induce significant acoustic changes in voicemail transmission. The fundamental frequency remained resistant to alterations in voice.
Data Availability Statement
Data supporting the results of this study are available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Publication History
Received: 12 July 2024
Accepted: 24 May 2025
Article published online:
16 October 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua Rego Freitas, 175, loja 1, República, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01220-010, Brazil
Halil Erdem Özel. Acoustic Changes in Voicemail Transmission Induced by Mobile Phones. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2025; 29: s00451810029.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1810029
- 
            References
- 1 Martínez Basterra Z, Fernández de Pinedo M, Rey JA. et al. Phone Speech Recognition Improvement in Noisy Environment: Use of a Bluetooth Accessory. Ear Nose Throat J 2021; 100 (07) 490-496
- 2 Anderson I, Baumgartner WD, Böheim K, Nahler A, Arnoldner C, D'Haese P. Telephone use: what benefit do cochlear implant users receive?. Int J Audiol 2006; 45 (08) 446-453 Erratum in: Int J Audiol. 2006;45(10):617
- 3 Zhang Q, Wang D, Zhao R, Yu Y, Shen J. Sensing to hear: Speech enhancement for mobile devices using acoustic signals. Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol 2021; 5 (03) 1-30
- 4 Wolfe J, Morais M, Schafer E. Speech Recognition of Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients Using a Wireless Audio Streaming Accessory for the Telephone. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (02) e20-e25
- 5 Kim MB, Chung WH, Choi J. et al. Effect of a Bluetooth-implemented hearing aid on speech recognition performance: subjective and objective measurement. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2014; 123 (06) 395-401
- 6 Smith P, Davis A. The benefits of using bluetooth accessories with hearing aids. Int J Audiol 2014; 53 (10) 770-773
- 7 Wolfe J, Morais Duke M, Schafer E, Cire G, Menapace C, O'Neill L. Evaluation of a wireless audio streaming accessory to improve mobile telephone performance of cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol 2016; 55 (02) 75-82
- 8 Maryn Y, Ysenbaert F, Zarowski A, Vanspauwen R. Mobile Communication Devices, Ambient Noise, and Acoustic Voice Measures. J Voice 2017; 31 (02) 248.e11-248.e23
- 9 Uloza V, Padervinskis E, Vegiene A. et al. Exploring the feasibility of smart phone microphone for measurement of acoustic voice parameters and voice pathology screening. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 272 (11) 3391-3399
- 10 Petrizzo D, Popolo PS. Smartphone Use in Clinical Voice Recording and Acoustic Analysis: A Literature Review. J Voice 2021; 35 (03) 499.e23-499.e28
- 11 Boogers LS, Chen BSJ, Coerts MJ, Rinkel RNPM, Hannema SE. Mobile Phone Applications Voice Tools and Voice Pitch Analyzer Validated with Ling WAVES to Measure Voice Frequency. J Voice 2022; •••
- 12 Markel J, Davis S, Applebaum T. A methodology for studying telephone amplitude distortion effects on narrowband speech processors. In ICASSP'79. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. 1979;4:449–52
- 13 Pommée T, Morsomme D. Voice Quality in Telephone Interviews: A preliminary Acoustic Investigation. J Voice 2022; •••
- 14 Weerathunge HR, Segina RK, Tracy L, Stepp CE. Accuracy of Acoustic Measures of Voice via Telepractice Videoconferencing Platforms. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2021; 64 (07) 2586-2599
- 15 Passetti RR, Constantini AC. The Effect of Telephone Transmission on Voice Quality Perception. J Voice 2019; 33 (05) 649-658
- 16 Grillo EU, Brosious JN, Sorrell SL, Anand S. Influence of Smartphones and Software on Acoustic Voice Measures. Int J Telerehabil 2016; 8 (02) 9-14
 
     
      
         
      
    
