RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1810618
Diagnostic Value of Image-Guided Percutaneous Omental, Peritoneal, and Mesenteric Biopsy: A Single-Center Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India

Abstract
Purpose
The purpose was to assess the technique, technical success rate, and diagnostic value of image-guided percutaneous biopsy of omental, peritoneal, and mesenteric lesions.
Materials and Methods
This was a combined prospective and retrospective study conducted at our center from January 2019 to April 2021. Retrospective data were obtained by retrospective review of the institutional database from January 2017 to January 2019. For the prospective data, all patients referred to the interventional radiology department for image-guided peritoneal, omental, or mesenteric biopsy during the study period were included in the study. Patients not willing to participate in the study, cases lost to follow-up, and those in whom imaging data could not be retrieved in the picture archiving and communication system were excluded from the study. A total of 207 patients who underwent computed tomography-guided biopsies were the final study cohort, including 134 prospective cases and 73 retrospective cases. Various technical aspects, like technical success rate, diagnostic yield, and diagnostic performance of the procedure, were calculated and tabulated.
Results
The technical success rate and diagnostic yield of all biopsies were 100 and 98.06%, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of all biopsies to diagnose pathology were found to be 84.62, 91.46, 70.21, and 96.15%, respectively, while the accuracy to detect malignant pathology was 90.15%.
Conclusion
The image-guided percutaneous biopsy of omental, mesenteric, and peritoneal lesions has a high technical success rate and diagnostic yield irrespective of lesion size and lesion depth.
Keywords
diagnostic value - image-guided percutaneous omental - peritoneal - mesenteric biopsy - technical success rateEthical Considerations
This study was approved by the Scientific and Ethics Committee of the hospital participating in the study as per guidelines. The written informed consents were taken from all the participants. Participant identification number (Participant ID) was used to maintain patient confidentiality for any data, form, report, or other record that was used for analysis. Confidentiality of the subjects was maintained throughout the process.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
12. August 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Healy JC, Reznek RH. The peritoneum, mesenteries and omenta: normal anatomy and pathological processes. Eur Radiol 1998; 8 (06) 886-900
- 2 Govindarajan P, Keshava SN. Ultrasound-guided omental biopsy: review of 173 patients. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2010; 20 (04) 307-309
- 3 Souza FF, Mortelé KJ, Cibas ES, Erturk SM, Silverman SG. Predictive value of percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy of peritoneal and omental masses: results in 111 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192 (01) 131-136
- 4 Que Y, Wang X, Liu Y, Li P, Ou G, Zhao W. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of greater omentum: an effective method to trace the origin of unclear ascites. Eur J Radiol 2009; 70 (02) 331-335
- 5 Rioux M, Michaud C. Sonographic detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis: a prospective study of 37 cases. Abdom Imaging 1995; 20 (01) 47-51 , discussion 56–57
- 6 Levitt RG, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ. Detection of neoplastic involvement of the mesentery and omentum by computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978; 131 (05) 835-838
- 7 Hatfield MK, Beres RA, Sane SS, Zaleski GX. Percutaneous imaging-guided solid organ core needle biopsy: coaxial versus noncoaxial method. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190 (02) 413-417
- 8 Appelbaum L, Kane RA, Kruskal JB, Romero J, Sosna J. Focal hepatic lesions: US-guided biopsy–lessons from review of cytologic and pathologic examination results. Radiology 2009; 250 (02) 453-458
- 9 Khati NJ, Gorodenker J, Hill MC. Ultrasound-guided biopsies of the abdomen. Ultrasound Q 2011; 27 (04) 255-268
- 10 Vadvala HV, Furtado VF, Kambadakone A, Frenk NE, Mueller PR, Arellano RS. Image-guided percutaneous omental and mesenteric biopsy: assessment of technical success rate and diagnostic yield. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28 (11) 1569-1576
- 11 Smith EH. Complications of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy. Review. Review Radiology 1991; 178 (01) 253-258
- 12 Ho LM, Thomas J, Fine SA, Paulson EK. Usefulness of sonographic guidance during percutaneous biopsy of mesenteric masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180 (06) 1563-1566
- 13 Gottlieb RH, Tan R, Widjaja J, Fultz PJ, Robinette WB, Rubens DJ. Extravisceral masses in the peritoneal cavity: sonographically guided biopsies in 52 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171 (03) 697-701
- 14 Hill DK, Schmit GD, Moynagh MR, Nicholas Kurup A, Schmitz JJ, Atwell TD. Percutaneous omental biopsy: efficacy and complications. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42 (05) 1566-1570
- 15 Iqbal J, Al-Qamari N, Sattar A, Rashid S. Ultrasound guided percutaneous biopsy of omentum: a safest technique to detect the causes of omental thickening. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol 2021; 10 (07) 781-784
- 16 Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL, Rose SC. Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous needle biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (07) 969-975
- 17 Babaei Jandaghi A, Lebady M, Zamani AA, Heidarzadeh A, Monfared A, Pourghorban R. A randomised clinical trial to compare coaxial and noncoaxial techniques in percutaneous core needle biopsy of renal parenchyma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 40 (01) 106-111
- 18 Babaei Jandaghi A, Habibzadeh H, Falahatkar S, Heidarzadeh A, Pourghorban R. Transperineal prostate core needle biopsy: a comparison of coaxial versus noncoaxial method in a randomised trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016; 39 (12) 1736-1742
- 19 Lee JK, Baek SY, Lim SM, Lee KH. Reticular infiltrations alone without mass in the mesentery and omentum identified at contrast-enhanced CT: efficacy of US-guided percutaneous core biopsy. Radiology 2011; 261 (01) 311-317
- 20 Yu H, Zhang C, Liu S. et al. Clinical value of CT-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy for peritoneal lesions. BMC Med Imaging 2020; 20 (01) 122
- 21 Spencer JA, Swift SE, Wilkinson N, Boon AP, Lane G, Perren TJ. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: image-guided peritoneal core biopsy for tumor type and patient care. Radiology 2001; 221 (01) 173-177