RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1811540
Fluoroscopy Time Required for Each Step of Interventional Endoscopic Ultrasonography
Funding None.

Abstract
Objectives
Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography (I-EUS) exposes patients to high levels of radiation exposure. However, no research on the fluoroscopy time required for each step of I-EUS has been published. That was the aim of this study.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively included patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) and pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD) in our hospital from October 2022 to November 2024. The procedure was categorized into four steps: step 1, transmural puncturing; step 2, guidewire placement; step 3, tract creation; and step 4, stent placement. We measured the fluoroscopy time required for each step via the fluoroscopic videos.
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables were described using medians and the first to third quartiles (Q1–Q3).
Results
The study included 36 participants (EUS-BD: 33, EUS-PDD: 3). The median [Q1–Q3] fluoroscopy times required for steps 1 to 4 were 120 [96–152], 175 [123–449], 194 [101–303], and 171 [90–208] seconds, respectively, for EUS-BD and 169 [119–195], 302 [234–529], 435 [430–477], and 233 [170–266] seconds, respectively, for EUS-PDD.
Conclusion
In I-EUS, the fluoroscopy time required for step 3, tract creation, was the longest. The technique needs to be improved, new devices developed, and clear communication be established among the operating team to prevent unnecessary fluoroscopy.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Authors' Contributions
M.W. designed the study and drafted the initial manuscript. K.O., M.K., and H.I. contributed to data analysis and interpretation and assisted in manuscript preparation. All other authors participated in data collection and interpretation and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final version and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring that any questions regarding accuracy or integrity are properly investigated and resolved.
Ethical Approval
This study was approved by our institutional review board (approval number: KMEO B24–161) and conducted according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, as revised in 2000.
Patients' Consent
Written informed consent for the procedure was obtained from all patients. For publication of this study, authors used the opt-out method to gain patient consent. Specifically, they posted an announcement on our institution's Web site to inform patients about the study, and those who opted out were excluded from the study.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
22. August 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Isayama H, Nakai Y, Matsuda K. et al; Subcommittee for Terminology of Interventional EUS of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. Proposal of classification and terminology of interventional endoscopic ultrasonography/endosonography. Dig Endosc 2025; 37 (01) 5-17
- 2 van der Merwe SW, van Wanrooij RLJ, Bronswijk M. et al. Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2022; 54 (02) 185-205
- 3 Marya NB, Pawa S, Thiruvengadam NR. et al; American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Standards of Practice Committee, ASGE Standards of Practice Committee Chair. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the role of therapeutic EUS in the management of biliary tract disorders: methodology and review of evidence. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 100 (06) e79-e135
- 4 Hayashi S, Takenaka M, Hosono M. et al. Diagnostic reference levels for fluoroscopy-guided gastrointestinal procedures in Japan from the REX-GI study: a nationwide multicentre prospective observational study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 2022; 20: 100376
- 5 Takenaka M, Hosono M, Rehani MM. et al. Comparison of radiation exposure between endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage and transpapillary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for pancreatobiliary diseases. Dig Endosc 2022; 34 (03) 579-586
- 6 Kwok K, Hasan N, Duloy A, Murad F, Nieto J, Day LW. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy radiation and fluoroscopy safety in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94 (04) 685-697.e4
- 7 Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M. et al; Authors on behalf of ICRP. ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs–threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP 2012; 41 (1–2): 1-322
- 8 Dumonceau JM, Garcia-Fernandez FJ, Verdun FR. et al; European Society of Digestive Endoscopy. Radiation protection in digestive endoscopy: European Society of Digestive Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2012; 44 (04) 408-421
- 9 Rehani MM, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Vañó E. et al. ICRP Publication 117. Radiological protection in fluoroscopically guided procedures performed outside the imaging department. Ann ICRP 2010; 40 (06) 1-102
- 10 Dietrich CF, Braden B, Burmeister S. et al. How to perform EUS-guided biliary drainage. Endosc Ultrasound 2022; 11 (05) 342-354
- 11 Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ. et al; Authors on behalf of ICRP. ICRP Publication 135: diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann ICRP 2017; 46 (01) 1-144
- 12 Campbell N, Sparrow K, Fortier M, Ponich T. Practical radiation safety and protection for the endoscopist during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55 (04) 552-557
- 13 Vanella G, Dell'Anna G, Loria A, Petrone MC, Del Vecchio A, Arcidiacono PG. Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10 (08) E1105-E1111
- 14 Takenaka M, Rehani MM, Hosono M. et al. Comparison of radiation exposure between endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and hepaticogastrostomy with antegrade stenting. J Clin Med 2022; 11 (06) 1705
- 15 Ogawa T, Kanno Y, Koshita S. et al. Prospective feasibility study on the efficacy and safety of a novel spiral dilator for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage. DEN Open 2022; 3 (01) e170
- 16 Itonaga M, Ashida R, Emori T. et al. Safety of skipping the tract dilation step for EUS-guided biliary drainage in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (with video). Surg Endosc 2024; 38 (04) 2288-2296
- 17 Mazza S, Masciangelo G, Mauro A. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy in malignant biliary obstruction: a comprehensive review on technical tips and clinical outcomes. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14 (23) 2644
- 18 Tomishima K, Isayama H, Suzuki A, Ishii S, Takahashi S, Fujisawa T. Technical review of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage/anastomosis and trans-endosonographically created route procedures for the treatment of pancreatic diseases. DEN Open 2024; 5 (01) e393
- 19 Itonaga M, Kitano M, Ashida R. Development of devices for interventional endoscopic ultrasound for the management of pancreatobiliary diseases. Dig Endosc 2023; 35 (03) 302-313
- 20 Ogura T, Nishioka N, Ueno S. et al. Effect of echoendoscope angle on success of guidewire manipulation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Endoscopy 2021; 53 (04) 369-375
- 21 Siddiqui UD, Levy MJ. EUS-guided transluminal interventions. Gastroenterology 2018; 154 (07) 1911-1924
- 22 Fusaroli P, Jenssen C, Hocke M. et al. EFSUMB guidelines on interventional ultrasound (INVUS), part V. Ultraschall Med 2016; 37 (04) 77-99
- 23 Oh D, Park DH, Song TJ. et al. Optimal biliary access point and learning curve for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with transmural stenting. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2017; 10 (01) 42-53
- 24 Sadek A, Hara K, Okuno N. et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage using a drill dilator: a retrospective study in Japan. Clin Endosc 2024; 57 (05) 666-674
- 25 Mukai S, Itoi T, Tsuchiya T. et al. One-step tract dilation using a novel long balloon catheter during endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2024; 31 (07) e38-e40
- 26 Kato A, Yoshida M, Hori Y. et al. The novel technique of drainage stenting using a tapered sheath dilator in endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage. DEN Open 2023; 4 (01) e303
- 27 Attili F, Rimbaş M, Galasso D, Larghi A. Fluoroless endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage after failed ERCP with a novel lumen-apposing metal stent mounted on a cautery-tipped delivery system. Endoscopy 2015; 47 (Suppl. 01) E619-E620
- 28 Krishnamoorthi R, Dasari CS, Thoguluva Chandrasekar V. et al. Effectiveness and safety of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (07) 2866-2877
- 29 Chen YI, Sahai A, Donatelli G. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage of first intent with a lumen-apposing metal stent vs endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in malignant distal biliary obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled study (ELEMENT Trial). Gastroenterology 2023; 165 (05) 1249-1261.e5
- 30 Takinami M, Kaneko J, Koda M. et al. Eye-tracking fluoroscopy system: a new artificial intelligence-based system to communicate activate watching of the monitor during endoscopy. Endoscopy 2023; 55 (S 01): E179-E180