Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1811972
Müllerian Anomalies: Revisited
Authors

Abstract
The Müllerian structures are developed from paired embryologic ducts that undergo fusion and resorption in utero to form the uterus, fallopian tubes, cervix, and upper two-thirds of the vagina. Any disruption of the normal embryological development of the Müllerian structure results in Müllerian anomalies. Müllerian anomalies are a complex spectrum of abnormalities that are usually associated with primary amenorrhea, infertility, and obstetric complications. Obstructed anomalies can be associated with endometriosis due to retrograde menstruation and sometimes endometriosis. Frequently, Müllerian anomalies are associated with renal anomalies; therefore, identification of both kidneys is important. Ovaries are normal in patients with Müllerian anomalies. Hysterosalpingography is routinely used in the evaluation of infertility and can demonstrate Müllerian anomalies, but has its limitations in characterizing the external fundal contour, which is a key component in categorizing the Müllerian anomaly. Two-dimensional ultrasound is the first-line modality for evaluating the uterus and adnexa. Three-dimensional ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging may help to visualize the external uterine fundal contour and internal indentation of the endometrial cavity, which are two morphologic characteristics that are keys to the diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. Three-dimensional ultrasound can be used to evaluate uterine morphology and endometrial cavity configuration. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology classifications are commonly used to categorize the Müllerian anomaly. The New ASRM classification is more practical as it appears simpler and more user-friendly, as it uses drawings with clear descriptions rather than symbols, and gives us a whole view of the anomaly. Correct diagnosis of Müllerian anomalies and their classification is critical for surgical and clinical management.
Publication History
Article published online:
25 September 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Acién P, Acién M. The presentation and management of complex female genital malformations. Hum Reprod Update 2016; 22 (01) 48-69
- 2 Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A. et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (08) 2032-2044
- 3 Bhagavath B, Ellie G, Griffiths KM. et al. Uterine malformations: an update of diagnosis, management, and outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2017; 72 (06) 377-392
- 4 O'Flynn O'Brien KL, Bhatia V, Homafar M. et al. The prevalence of Müllerian anomalies in women with a diagnosed renal anomaly. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2021; 34 (02) 154-160
- 5 Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17 (06) 761-771
- 6 Chandler TM, Machan LS, Cooperberg PL, Harris AC, Chang SD. Mullerian duct anomalies: from diagnosis to intervention. Br J Radiol 2009; 82 (984) 1034-1042
- 7 Sugi MD, Penna R, Jha P. et al. Müllerian duct anomalies: role in fertility and pregnancy. Radiographics 2021; 41 (06) 1857-1875
- 8 Wall DJ, Reinhold C, Akin EA. et al; Expert Panel on Women's Imaging. ACR appropriateness criteria female infertility. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17 (5S): S113-S124
- 9 Alcázar JL, Carriles I, Cajas MB. et al. Diagnostic performance of two dimensional ultrasound, two dimensional sonohysterography and three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of septate uterus-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13 (04) 807
- 10 Groszmann YS, Benacerraf BR. Complete evaluation of anatomy and morphology of the infertile patient in a single visit; the modern infertility pelvic ultrasound examination. Fertil Steril 2016; 105 (06) 1381-1393
- 11 Merritt BA, Behr SC, Khati NJ. Imaging of infertility, part 2: hysterosalpingograms to magnetic resonance imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 2020; 58 (02) 227-238
- 12 Reuter KL, Daly DC, Cohen SM. Septate versus bicornuate uteri: errors in imaging diagnosis. Radiology 1989; 172 (03) 749-752
- 13 Adhesions AD. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988; 49 (06) 944-955
- 14 Grimbizis GF, Campo R. Congenital malformations of the female genital tract: the need for a new classification system. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (02) 401-407
- 15 Hall-Craggs MA, Williams CE, Pattison SH, Kirkham AP, Creighton SM. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 2013; 269 (03) 787-792
- 16 Yoo RE, Cho JY, Kim SY, Kim SH. Magnetic resonance evaluation of Müllerian remnants in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Korean J Radiol 2013; 14 (02) 233-239
- 17 Duncan PA, Shapiro LR, Stangel JJ, Klein RM, Addonizio JC. The MURCS association: Müllerian duct aplasia, renal aplasia, and cervicothoracic somite dysplasia. J Pediatr 1979; 95 (03) 399-402
- 18 Carrington BM, Hricak H, Nuruddin RN, Secaf E, Laros Jr RK, Hill EC. Müllerian duct anomalies: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1990; 176 (03) 715-720
- 19 Troiano RN. Magnetic resonance imaging of Mullerian duct anomalies of the uterus. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 14 (04) 269-279
- 20 Li S, Qayyum A, Coakley FV, Hricak H. Association of renal agenesis and Mullerian duct anomalies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24 (06) 829-834
- 21 Bermejo C, Martínez Ten P, Cantarero R. et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35 (05) 593-601
- 22 Fedele L, Dorta M, Brioschi D, Villa L, Arcaini L, Bianchi S. Re-examination of the anatomic indications for hysteroscopic metroplasty. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 39 (02) 127-131
- 23 Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 2004; 233 (01) 19-34
- 24 Sarto GE, Simpson JL. Abnormalities of the Müllerian and Wolffian duct systems. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1978; 14 (6C): 37-54
- 25 Uğur M, Turan C, Mungan T. et al. Endometriosis in association with Müllerian anomalies. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1995; 40 (04) 261-264
- 26 Pellerito JS, McCarthy SM, Doyle MB, Glickman MG, DeCherney AH. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology 1992; 183 (03) 795-800
- 27 Miller RJ, Breech LL. Surgical correction of vaginal anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2008; 51 (02) 223-236
- 28 Homer HA, Li TC, Cooke ID. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 2000; 73 (01) 1-14
- 29 Pfeifer SM, Attaran M, Goldstein J. et al. ASRM Müllerian anomalies classification 2021. Fertil Steril 2021; 116 (05) 1238-1252
- 30 Propst AM, Hill III JA. Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med 2000; 18 (04) 341-350
- 31 Ott DJ, Fayez J, Zagoria R. Eds. Congenital anomalies. In: Hysterosalpingography: a text and atlas. 2nd ed.. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1998: 59-69
- 32 Rackow BW, Arici A. Reproductive performance of women with Müllerian anomalies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19 (03) 229-237
- 33 Robbins JB, Parry JP, Guite KM. et al. MRI of pregnancy-related issues: Müllerian duct anomalies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198 (02) 302-310
- 34 Capito C, Sarnacki S. Menstrual retention in a Robert's uterus. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2009; 22 (05) e104-e106
- 35 Maddukuri SB, Karegowda LH, Prakashini K, Kantipudi S. Robert's uterus: a rare congenital Müllerian duct anomaly causing haematometra. BMJ Case Rep 2014; 2014: bcr2014204489
- 36 Behr SC, Courtier JL, Qayyum A. Imaging of Müllerian duct anomalies. Radiographics 2012; 32 (06) E233-E250
- 37 Siegelman ES, Oliver ER. MR imaging of endometriosis: ten imaging pearls. Radiographics 2012; 32 (06) 1675-1691
- 38 Gupta N, Mittal S, Dadhwal V, Misra R. A unique congenital Mullerian anomaly: Robert's uterus. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007; 276 (06) 641-643
- 39 Perino A, Chianchiano N, Simonaro C, Cittadini E. Endoscopic management of a case of 'complete septate uterus with unilateral haematometra.'. Hum Reprod 1995; 10 (08) 2171-2173
- 40 Li J, Yu W, Wang M, Feng LM. Hysteroscopic treatment of Robert's uterus with laparoscopy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015; 41 (09) 1491-1494
- 41 Ludwin A, Ludwin I, Martins WP. Robert's uterus: modern imaging techniques and ultrasound-guided hysteroscopic treatment without laparoscopy or laparotomy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48 (04) 526-529
- 42 Ludwin A, Lindheim SR, Bhagavath B, Martins WP, Ludwin I. Longitudinal vaginal septum: a proposed classification and surgical management. Fertil Steril 2020; 114 (04) 899-901
- 43 Haddad B, Louis-Sylvestre C, Poitout P, Paniel BJ. Longitudinal vaginal septum: a retrospective study of 202 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997; 74 (02) 197-199
- 44 Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A. et al. The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Gynecol Surg 2013; 10 (03) 199-212
- 45 Setty T, Naftalin J, Jurkovic D. Accessory cavitated uterine malformations (ACUMs): an unfamiliar cause of dysmenorrhoea. Obstet Gynaecol 2022; 24: 40-49
- 46 Gupta S, Manchanda S, Vyas S, Malhotra N, Mathur SR, Kulshrestha V. Imaging features of accessory cavitated uterine mass (ACUM): a peculiar yet correctable cause of dysmenorrhea. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48 (03) 1100-1106
- 47 Jain N, Verma R. Imaging diagnosis of accessory and cavitated uterine mass, a rare Mullerian anomaly. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2014; 24 (02) 178-181
- 48 Acién P, Bataller A, Fernández F, Acién MI, Rodríguez JM, Mayol MJ. New cases of accessory and cavitated uterine masses (ACUM): a significant cause of severe dysmenorrhea and recurrent pelvic pain in young women. Hum Reprod 2012; 27 (03) 683-694
- 49 Bedaiwy MA, Henry DN, Elguero S, Pickett S, Greenfield M. Accessory and cavitated uterine mass with functional endometrium in an adolescent: diagnosis and laparoscopic excision technique. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2013; 26 (04) e89-e91
- 50 Buck Louis GM, Hediger ML, Peterson CM. et al; ENDO Study Working Group. Incidence of endometriosis by study population and diagnostic method: the ENDO study. Fertil Steril 2011; 96 (02) 360-365
- 51 Mok-Lin EY, Wolfberg A, Hollinquist H, Laufer MR. Endometriosis in a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome and complete uterine agenesis: evidence to support the theory of coelomic metaplasia. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2010; 23 (01) e35-e37
- 52 Abrao MS, Gonçalves MO, Dias Jr JA, Podgaec S, Chamie LP, Blasbalg R. Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2007; 22 (12) 3092-3097