Download PDF
Endoscopy 1999; 31(8): 654-663
DOI: 10.1055/s-1999-127
Special Topic
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ·New York

12. Appropriateness of Colonoscopy: Surveillance After Polypectomy [1]

M. Bochud*, B. Burnand*, F. Froehlich**, R. W. Dubois***, J.-P. Vader*, J.-J. Gonvers**
  • * Institut Universitaire de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • ** Policlinique Médicale Universitaire, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • *** Protocare Sciences, Santa Monica, USA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 1999 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Introduction

A colorectal polyp is a circumscribed mass of tissue that projects above the surface of the intestinal mucosa, which may be classified as either pedunculated or sessile depending on whether or not it contains a discrete stalk [1] , and according to size and type (neoplastic-adenomas; non-neoplastic, e.g. inflammatory, hyperplastic). Adenomas are the most significant type of colorectal polyps because of their alleged role in the natural history of colorectal cancer development. Indeed, several studies support the concept that colorectal neoplasia develops most often through a continuous process from normal mucosa to benign adenoma and then to carcinoma [2] [3] [4] . In addition, the importance of adenomatous polyps is emphasized by their frequent occurrence. In several cross-sectional and autopsy studies involving various populations (community- and hospital-based, referral for colonoscopy), the prevalence of adenomas ranged from 25 to 35 %, and the prevalence of hyperplastic polyps from 10 to 35 % [3] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] . The objective of using colonoscopy for post-polypectomy surveillance is to reduce the risk of development and death from colorectal cancer.

In November 1998, a multidisciplinary European expert panel convened in Lausanne, Switzerland, to discuss and develop criteria for the appropriate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy, a widely-used procedure, regarded as highly accurate and safe. The RAND appropriateness method was chosen for this purpose, because it allows the development of appropriateness criteria based on published evidence and supplemented by explicit expert opinion. A detailed description of the RAND appropriateness method, including the literature search process [13], and of the whole process, as well as the global results of the panel [14], are published as separate articles in this issue of the Journal. The literature review was based on a systematic search of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library conducted up to the end of 1997 and completed with some key articles published in 1998. Updating and revision of the literature review is currently ongoing.

This article contains three parts; 1. the review of the literature that was used by the panelists to support their ratings of appropriateness of use of colonoscopy for surveillance after endoscopic polypectomy; 2. an overview of the main panel results; 3. a summary of the published evidence and of the panel based appropriateness criteria.

1 The European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE, Lausanne, Switzerland)

References

  • 1 Bond J H. Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with nonfamilial colorectal polyps. The Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology (published erratum appears in Ann Intern Med 1994 Feb; 15; 120 (4); 347).  Ann Intern Med. 1993;  119 836-843
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Muto T, Bussey H J, Morson B C. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum.  Cancer. 1975;  36 2251-2270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Clark J C, Collan Y, Eide T J, Esteve J, Ewen S, Gibbs N M, Jensen O M, Koskela E, MacLennan R, Simpson J G. Prevalence of polyps in an autopsy series from areas with varying incidence of large-bowel cancer.  Int J Cancer. 1985;  36 179-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Stryker S J, Wolff B G, Culp C E, Libbe S D, Ilstrup D M, MacCarty R L. Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.  Gastroenterology. 1987;  93 1009-1013
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Williams A R, Balasooriya B A, Day D W. Polyps and cancer of the large bowel: a necropsy study in Liverpool.  Gut. 1982;  23 835-842
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Vatn M H, Stalsberg H. The prevalence of polyps of the large intestine in Oslo: an autopsy study.  Cancer. 1982;  49 819-825
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Provenzale D, Garrett J W, Condon S E, Sandler R S. Risk for colon adenomas in patients with rectosigmoid hyperplastic polyps.  Ann Intern Med. 1990;  113 760-763
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Winawer S J, Zauber A G, O'Brien M J, Gottlieb L S, Sternberg S S, Stewart E T, Bond J H, Schapiro M, Panish J F, Waye J D, et al. The National Polyp Study. Design, methods, and characteristics of patients with newly diagnosed polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.  Cancer. 1992;  70 1236-1245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rex D K, Smith J J, Ulbright T M, Lehman G A. Distal colonic hyperplastic polyps do not predict proximal adenomas in asymptomatic average-risk subjects.  Gastroenterology. 1992;  102 317-319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Winawer S J, Zauber A G, O'Brien M J, Ho M N, Gottlieb L, Sternberg S S, Waye J D, Bond J, Schapiro M, Stewart E T, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.  N Engl J Med. 1993;  328 901-906
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 The Multicenter Study of Colorectal Adenomas Workgroup . Rationale, objectives, methods and characteristics of the study cohort. The Multicenter Study of Colorectal Adenomas (SMAC). (GENERIC) Ref. Type: Generic.  Tumori. 1995;  81 157-163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Croizet O, Moreau J, Arany Y, Delvaux M, Rumeau J L, Escourrou J. Follow-up of patients with hyperplastic polyps of the large bowel.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  46 119-123
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Vader J P, Burnand B, Froehlich F, Dubois R W, Bochud M, Gonvers J J. The European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): Project and methods.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 572-578
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Vader J P, Froehlich F, Dubois R W, Beglinger C, Wietlisbach V, Pittet V, Ebel N, Gonvers J J, Burnand B. The European Panel on Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): Conclusions and WWW site.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 687-694
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Anonymous . A multicenter study of colorectal adenomas. Rationale, objectives, methods and characteristics of the study cohort. The Multicentric Study of Colorectal Adenomas (SMAC) Workgroup.  Tumori. 1995;  81 157-163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sciallero S, Costantini M, Bertinelli E, Castiglione G, Onofri P, Aste H, Casetti T, Mantellini P, Bucchi L, Parri R, et al. Distal hyperplastic polyps do not predict proximal adenomas: results from a multicentric study of colorectal adenomas.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  46 124-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Brady P G, Straker R J, McClave S A, Nord H J, Pinkas M, Robinson B E. Are hyperplastic rectosigmoid polyps associated with an increased risk of proximal colonic neoplasms?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 481-485
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rex D K, Lehman G A, Ulbright T M, Smith J J, Pound D C, Hawes R H, Helper D J, Wiersema M J, Langefeld C D, Li W. Colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic persons with negative fecal occult blood tests: influence of age, gender, and family history.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;  88 825-831
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jorgensen O D, Kronborg O, Fenger C. A randomized surveillance study of patients with pedunculated and small sessile tubular and tubulovillous adenomas. The funen adenoma follow-up study.  Scan J Gastroenterol. 1995;  30 686-692
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Weston A P, Campbell D R. Diminutive colonic polyps: histopathology, spatial distribution, concomitant significant lesions, and treatment complications.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;  90 24-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Waye J D, Lewis B S, Frankel A, Geller S A. Small colon polyps.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1988;  83 120-122
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Isler J T, Brown P C, Lewis F G, Billingham R P. The role of preoperative colonoscopy in colorectal cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;  30 435-439
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Olsen H W, Lawrence W A, Snook C W, Mutch W M. Review of recurrent polyps and cancer in 500 patients with initial colonoscopy for polyps.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;  31 222-227
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lipper S, Kahn L B, Ackerman L V. The significance of microscopic invasive cancer in endoscopically removed polyps of the large bowel. A clinicopathologic study of 51 cases.  Cancer. 1983;  52 1691-1699
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Burt R W, Bishop D T, Cannon L A, Dowdle M A, Lee R G, Skolnick M H. Dominant inheritance of adenomatous colonic polyps and colorectal cancer.  N Engl J Med. 1985;  312 1540-1544
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Cannon-Albright L A, Skolnick M H, Bishop D T, Lee R G, Burt R W. Common inheritance of susceptibility to colonic adenomatous polyps and associated colorectal cancers.  N Engl J Med. 1988;  319 533-537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ueyama T, Kawamoto K, Iwashita I, Kitagawa S, Haraguchi Y, Muranaka T, Shimoda Y, Nakamura S, Masuda K. Natural history of minute sessile colonic adenomas based on radiographic findings. Is endoscopic removal of every colonic adenoma necessary?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 268-272
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Murakami R, Tsukuma H, Kanamori S, Imanishi K, Otani T, Nakanishi K, Fujimoto I, Oshima A. Natural history of colorectal polyps and the effect of polypectomy on occurrence of subsequent cancer.  Int J Cancer. 1990;  46 159-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Winawer S J, Zauber A G, Ho M N, O'Brien M J, Gottlieb L S, Sternberg S S, Waye J D, Schapiro M, Bond J H, Panish J F, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup (see comments).  N Engl J Med. 1993;  329 1977-1981
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Herzog P, Holtermuller K H, Preiss J, Fischer J, Ewe K, Schreiber H J, Berres M. Fecal blood loss in patients with colonic polyps: a comparison of measurements with 51 chromium-labeled erythrocytes and with the Haemoccult test.  Gastroenterology. 1982;  83 957-962
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Goulston K J, Cook I, Dent O F. How important is rectal bleeding in the diagnosis of bowel cancer and polyps?.  Lancet. 1986;  2 261-265
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Cook I J, Pavli P, Riley J W, Goulston K J, Dent O F. Gastrointestinal investigation of iron deficiency anaemia.  Br Med J. 1986;  292 1380-1382
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Alemayehu G, Jarnerot G. Same-day upper and lower endoscopy in patients with occult bleeding, melena, hematochezia, and/or microcytic anemia. A retrospective study of 224 patients.  Scan J Gastroenterol. 1993;  28 667-672
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Olsen H W, Lawrence W A, Snook C W, Mutch W M. Risk factors and screening techniques in 500 patients with benign and malignant colon polyps. An urban community experience.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;  31 216-221
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Jass J R, Sobin L H. Histological typing of intestinal tumours. World Health Organisation (eds) International Histological Classification of Tumours. 2nd ed.  Geneva; Springer Verlag 1989: 15
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Morson B C, Bussey H J. Magnitude of risk for cancer in patients with colorectal adenomas.  Br J Surg. 1985;  72 23-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 O'Brien M J, Winawer S J, Zauber A G, Gottlieb L S, Sternberg S S, Diaz B, Dickersin G R, Ewing S, Geller S, Kasimian D. The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas.  Gastroenterology. 1990;  98 371-379
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Atkin W S, Morson B C, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas (see comments).  N Engl J Med. 1992;  326 658-662
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Jorgensen O D, Kronborg O, Fenger C. The funen adenoma follow-up study. Characteristics of patients and initial adenomas in relation to severe dysplasia.  Scan J Gastroenterol. 1993;  28 239-243
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Matek W, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Demling L. Follow-up of patients with colorectal adenomas.  Endoscopy. 1985;  17 175-181
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 DiSario J A, Foutch P G, Mai H D, Pardy K, Manne R K. Prevalence and malignant potential of colorectal polyps in asymptomatic, average-risk men.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;  86 941-945
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Wegener M, Borsch G, Schmidt G. Colorectal adenomas. Distribution, incidence of malignant transformation, and rate of recurrence.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1986;  29 383-387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Spencer R J, Melton L J, Ready R L, Ilstrup D M. Treatment of small colorectal polyps: a population-based study of the risk of subsequent carcinoma.  Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1984;  59 305-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Gottlieb L S, Winawer S J, Sternberg S S, et al. National Polyp Study: the diminutive colonic polyp (Abstract).  Gastrointest Endosc. 1984;  30 143
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Simons B D, Morrison A S, Lev R, Verhoek-Oftedahl W. Relationship of polyps to cancer of the large intestine.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;  84 962-966
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Winawer S J, Zauber A G, Gerdes H, O'Brien M J, Gottlieb L S, Sternberg S S, Bond J H, Waye J D, Schapiro M, Panish J F, et al. Risk of colorectal cancer in the families of patients with adenomatous polyps. National Polyp Study Workgroup.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  334 82-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Irvine E J, O'Connor J, Frost R A, Shorvon P, Somers S, Stevenson G W, Hunt R H. Prospective comparison of double contrast barium enema plus flexible sigmoidoscopy vs. colonoscopy in rectal bleeding: barium enema vs colonoscopy in rectal bleeding.  Gut. 1988;  29 1188-1193
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Feczko P J, Bernstein M A, Halpert R D, Ackerman L V. Small colonic polyps: a reappraisal of their significance.  Radiology. 1984;  152 301-303
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Rex D K, Weddle R A, Lehman G A, Pound D C, O'Connor K W, Hawes R H, Dittus R S, Lappas J C, Lumeng L. Flexible sigmoidoscopy plus air contrast barium enema versus colonoscopy for suspected lower gastrointestinal bleeding.  Gastroenterology. 1990;  98 855-861
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Achkar E, Carey W. Small polyps found during fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic patients.  Ann Intern Med. 1988;  109 880-883
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Rokkas T, Karameris A, Mikou G. Small polyps found at sigmoidoscopy: are they significant?.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1993;  40 475-477
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Blue M G, Sivak M VJ, Achkar E, Matzen R, Stahl R R. Hyperplastic polyps seen at sigmoidoscopy are markers for additional adenomas seen at colonoscopy.  Gastroenterology. 1991;  100 564-566
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Granqvist S. Distribution of polyps in the large bowel in relation to age. A colonoscopic study.  Scan J Gastroenterol. 1981;  16 1025-1031
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Nusko G, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Hermanek P, Ell C, Hahn E G. Correlation of polypoid lesions in the distal colorectum and proximal colon in asymptomatic screening subjects.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;  8 351-354
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Read T E, Read J D, Butterly L F. Importance of adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy.  N Engl J Med. 1997;  336 8-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Jergas M, Wegener M, Schmidt-Heinevetter G. Correlation between hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps of the colon.  Fortschr Med. 1993;  111 489-492
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Kadakia S C, Wrobleski C S, Kadakia A S, Meier N J. Prevalence of proximal colonic polyps in average-risk asymptomatic patients with negative fecal occult blood tests and flexible sigmoidoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 112-117
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Ellis C N, Boggs H W, Slagle G W, Cole P A, Coyle D J. Clinical significance of diminutive polyps of the rectum and sigmoid colon.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;  36 8-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Foutch P G, DiSario J A, Pardy K, Mai H D, Manne R K. The sentinel hyperplastic polyp: a marker for synchronous neoplasia in the proximal colon.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;  86 1482-1485
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Opelka F G, Timmcke A E, Gathright J BJ, Ray J E, Hicks T C. Diminutive colonic polyps: an indication for colonoscopy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;  35 178-181
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Rossini F P, Ferrari A, Spandre M, Coverlizza S. Coloscopic polypectomy in diagnosis and management of cancerous adenomas: an individual and multicentric experience.  Endoscopy. 1982;  14 124-127
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Morson B C, Whiteway J E, Jones E A, Macrae F A, Williams C B. Histopathology and prognosis of malignant colorectal polyps treated by endoscopic polypectomy.  Gut. 1984;  25 437-444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Fucini C, Wolff B G, Spencer R J. An appraisal of endoscopic removal of malignant colonic polyps.  Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1986;  61 123-126
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Mathus-Vliegen E M, Tytgat G N. The potential and limitations of laser photoablation of colorectal adenomas.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 9-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 De Palma G D, Caiazzo C, di Matteo E, Capalbo G, Catanzano C. Endoscopic treatment of sessile rectal adenomas: comparison of nd : yag laser therapy and injection-assisted piecemeal polypectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  41 553-556
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Bond J H. Follow-up after polypectomy: consensus?.  Eur J Cancer. 1995;  31A 1141-1144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Leinicke J L, Dodds W J, Hogan W J, Stewart E T. A comparison of colonoscopy and roentgenography for detecting polypoid lesions of the colon.  Gastrointestinal Radiology. 1977;  2 125-128
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Hintze R E, Adler A, Veltzke W. Endoscopic resection of large colorectal adenomas: a combination of snare and laser ablation.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 665-670
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Eckardt V F, Fuchs M, Kanzler G, Remmele W, Stienen U. Follow-up of patients with colonic polyps containing severe atypia and invasive carcinoma. Compliance, recurrence, and survival.  Cancer. 1988;  61 2552-2557
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Nava H, Carlsson G, Petrelli N J, Herrera L, Mittelman A. Follow-up colonoscopy in patients with colorectal adenomatous polyps.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;  30 465-468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Otchy D P, Ransohoff D F, Wolff B G, Weaver A, Ilstrup D, Carlson H, Rademacher D. Metachronous colon cancer in persons who have had a large adenomatous polyp.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 448-454
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Hackelsberger A, Fruhmorgen P, Weiler H, Heller T, Seeliger H, Junghanns K. Endoscopic polypectomy and management of colorectal adenomas with invasive carcinoma.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 153-158
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Macrae F A, Tan K G, Williams C B. Towards safer colonoscopy: a report on the complications of 5000 diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopies.  Gut. 1983;  24 376-383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Nivatvongs S. Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy. An experience with 1555 polypectomies.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1986;  29 825-830
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Rosen L, Bub D S, Reed J F, Nastasee S A. Hemorrhage following colonoscopic polypectomy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;  36 1126-1131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Waye J D, Lewis B S, Yessayan S. Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;  15 347-351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Shirai M, Nakamura T, Matsuura A, Ito Y, Kobayashi S. Safer colonoscopic polypectomy with local submucosal injection of hypertonic saline-epinephrine solution.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 334-338
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Newcomb P A, Norfleet R G, Storer B E, Surawicz T S, Marcus P M. Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality.  Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1992;  84 1572-1575
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Selby J V, Friedman G D, Quesenberry C P, Weiss N S. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer.  N Engl J Med. 1992;  326 653-657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Gloeckler-Ries L A, Hankey B F, Edwards B K. Cancer statistics review, 1973 - 1987. Department of Health and Human Services 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 81 Winawer S J, Fletcher R H, Miller L, Godlee F, Stolar M H, Mulrow C D, Woolf S H, Glick S N, Ganiats T G, Bond J H, et al. Colorectal cancer screening - clinical guidelines and rationale.  Gastroenterology. 1997;  112 1060-1063
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Rex D K. Surveillance colonoscopy after resection of colorectal polyps and cancer.  ASGE Clinical Update. 1998;  6 1-4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Bond J H. Interference with the adenoma-carcinoma sequence.  Eur J Cancer. 1995;  31A 1115-1117
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

1 The European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE, Lausanne, Switzerland)

Dr. Bernard Burnand

IUMSP

Bugnon 17

CH-1005 Lausanne

Switzerland

Phone: + 41-21-3144954

Email: Bernard.Burnand@inst.hospvd.ch

      >