Endoscopy 1999; 31(2): 215-225
DOI: 10.1055/s-1999-13672
Special Article

Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

State-of-the-Art: Ulcer and Gastritis

B. S. Anand, D. Y. Graham
  • Digestive Diseases Section, Dept. of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine and Veterans' Association Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 1999 (online)

As in previous years, developments in the field of ulcers and gastritis have been dominated by new findings related to Helicobacter pylori. With the decrease in the frequency of H. pylori infection, the relative proportion of non- H. pylori ulcers has increased. Attempts to reduce the endoscopy workload by H. pylori or CagA screening have not been successful, and are probably ill-advised. It has become increasingly clear that curing H. pylori infection will not automatically lead to complete relief of symptoms in patients with duodenal ulcer disease. Post-therapy confirmation of cure will probably become the norm. Studies comparing omeprazole to misoprostol or ranitidine for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) ulcer prevention in true NSAID ulcers have shown that omeprazole is equal to full-dose misoprostol for ulcer healing and to the lowest useful dose of misoprostol for ulcer prevention. H2-receptor antagonists cannot be recommended for NSAID ulcer healing or prevention. Elimination of H. pylori increases the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in a population in such a way that superficially, there appears to be a choice between more gastroesophageal reflux disease or multifocal atrophic gastritis. The risk of developing adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction is many times (10-fold to 60-fold) less than the risk of developing gastric cancer from CagA-positive H. pylori infection with multifocal atrophic gastritis - the “protective” lesion

    >