Download PDF
Endoscopy 1999; 31(6): 431-436
DOI: 10.1055/s-1999-42
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ·New York

Endoscopic Hemostasis in Sphincterotomy-Induced Hemorrhage: Its Efficacy and Safety

 H. J. Kim,  M. H. Kim,  D. I. Kim,  H. J. Lee,  S. J. Myung,  K. S. Yoo,  E. T. Park,  B. C. Lim,  D. W. Seo,  S. K. Lee,  Y. I. Min
  • Dept. of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 1999 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Introduction

Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (ES) is regarded as a fundamental procedure amongst endoscopic therapeutic interventions for various pancreaticobiliary diseases. However, complications, such as hemorrhage, pancreatitis or perforation of the duodenal wall, cannot always be avoided and occur in approximately 10 - 13 % of these procedures [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].

Bleeding, one of the most frequent complications, occurs in 0.5 to 12 % of the procedures [6] [7] [8] [9], and ranges in severity from self-limited mucosal oozing to life-threatening arterial bleeding. Since the introduction of endoscopic hemostasis with epinephrine or alcohol, the morbidity and mortality of ES-induced hemorrhage have declined. There have been many reports regarding the efficacy of endoscopic hemostasis [10] [11]; however, most of them dealt only with the effectiveness of the treatment and scarcely mentioned its safety. Moreover, there were few, well organized prospective studies aimed at identifying the risk factors for ES-induced hemorrhage.

In the present study, we prospectively investigated the risk factors for ES-induced hemorrhage from three aspects: patient factors, ampulla of Vater factors, and technical factors. We also evaluated the safety as well as the effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis.

References

  • 1 Huibregtse K. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy and their prevention.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  26 961-962
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Aliperti G. Complications related to diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1996;  6 379-407
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Freeman M L. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: a review.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 288-297
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sherman S, Lehman G A. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy. In: Barkin J, O'Phelan CA (eds). Advanced therapeutic endoscopy.  New York; Raven Press 1990: 201-210
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Mehta S N, Pavone E, Barkun J S, et al. Predictors of post-ERCP complication in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 457-463
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Freeman M L, Nelson D B, Sherman S, et al. Complication of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 909-918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Grimm H, Soehendra N. Unterspritzung zur Behandlung der Papillotomieblutung.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1983;  108 1512-1514
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Leung J WC, Chan F KL, Sung J JY, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy induced hemorrhage: a study of risk factors and the role of epinephrine injection.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 550-554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Classen M, Demling L. Endoskopische Sphinkterotomie der Papilla Vateri und Steinextraktion aus dem Ductus Choledochus.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1974;  99 496-497
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Vasconez C, Llach J, Bordas J M, et al. Injection treatment of hemorrhage induced by endoscopic sphincterotomy.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 37-39
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cotton P B, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 383-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Shields S J, Carr-Locke D L. Sphincterotomy techniques and risks.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1996;  6 17-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Mellinger J D, Ponsky J L. Bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy as underestimated entity.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991;  172 465-469
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Foutch P G. A prospective assessment of results for needle-knife papillotomy and standard endoscopic sphincterotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  41 25-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kohler A, Maier M, Benz C, et al. A new current generator with automatically controlled system (endocut mode) for endoscopic sphincterotomy - preliminary experience.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 351-355
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Chung S CS, Leong H, Chan A CW, et al. Epinephrine or epinephrine plus alcohol for injection of bleeding ulcers: a prospective randomized trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 591-595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Soehendra N, Grimm H, Stenzel M. Injection of nonvariceal bleeding lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract.  Endoscopy. 1985;  17 129-132
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Stevens P D, Lebwohl O. Hypertensive emergency and ventricular tachycardia after endoscopic epinephrine injection of a Mallory-Weiss tear.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 77-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Myung-Hwan KimM.D. 

Dept. of Internal Medicine

Asan Medical Center

388-1 Poongnapdong, Songpagu

Seoul 138-040

South Korea

Phone: + 82-2476-0824

Email: mhkim@www.amc.seoul.kr

      >