Download PDF
Endoscopy 2000; 32(6): 444-451
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-647
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ·New York

Endoscopic Sphincter of Oddi Manometry with a Portable Electronic Microtransducer System: Comparison with the Perfusion Manometry Method and Routine Clinical Application

T. Wehrmann1 , T. Schmitt1 , A. Schönfeld2 , W. F. Caspary1 , H. Seifert1
  • 1 Dept. of Internal Medicine II, J. W. Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • 2 Standard Instruments GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Background and Study Aims: Endoscopic perfusion manometry (PM) of the sphincter of Oddi (SO) requires expensive equipment which is relatively large and uncomfortable to handle in the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) setting. Furthermore, the volume load of the biliopancreatic system may contribute to the increased risk of pancreatitis after SO manometry.

Patients and Methods: The newly developed small and lightweight microtransducer system consists of a portable data-logger with intregrated online display which is connected to a 4-Fr manometry probe. The manometry catheter is inserted endoscopically into the biliopancreatic system via a 7-Fr Teflon sheath. SO motility can be observed online on the display but the data can also be stored for later analysis on a personal computer (PC). To validate the new method, 15 patients with suspected biliary SO dysfunction underwent both PM as well as microtransducer manometry (MTM) in randomized order. Thereafter, 50 consecutive patients with suspected biliary or pancreatic SO dysfunction were investigated solely by MTM.

Results: PM was possible in 13 of 15 cases whereas MTM could be performed in all 15 patients. The basal SO pressure tended to be lower (≉ 5 mmHg) when measured with the MTM, compared with the PM method, but there was a significant and nearly linear correlation between the basal SO pressures obtained by both methods (r = 0.98, P < 0.001). SO dysfunction was diagnosed in the same five patients using both methods. Furthermore, the parameters of phasic SO motility were highly comparable when measured by MTM and PM. MTM was carried out successfully in 49 of 50 patients and only one MTM probe was used for all examinations, without malfunction. The endoscopist was able to diagnose SO dysfunction (by immediate observation of SO motility on the display) in 19 of 20 patients (when compared with the later PC analysis) and SO motility was judged correctly as normal in the remaining 29 cases. MTM was repeated in five patients with SOD 1 - 6 weeks after the first examination and the manometric findings were confirmed in all cases. Mild postmanometry pancreatitis was observed in only one of 49 patients (2 %).

Conclusions: Endoscopic MTM is a reliable, safe, very easy to handle, and low-cost alternative for the clinical assessment of SO motility.

References

  • 1 Vondrasek P, Eberhardt G, Classen M. Endoscopic semi-conductor manometry.  Int J Med. 1974;  3 188-192
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nebel O T. Manometric evaluation of the papilla of Vater.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1975;  21 126-128
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rösch W, Koch H, Demling L. Manometric studies during ERCP and endoscopic papillotomy.  Endoscopy. 1976;  8 30-33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Arndorfer R C, Steff J J, Dodds W J, et al. Improved infusion system for intraluminal esophageal manometry.  Gastroenterology. 1977;  73 23-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Geenen J E, Hogan W J, Dodds W J, et al. Intraluminal pressure recording from the human sphincter of Oddi.  Gastroenterology. 1980;  78 317-321
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gandolfi L, Corraziari E. The international workshop on sphincter of Oddi manometry.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1986;  32 46-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cattau E, Johnson D A, Benjamin S B, et al. Sphincter of Oddi manometry: a survey of methodology, complications and clinical application.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;  34 185-187
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lans J L, Parikh N P, Geenen J E. Application of sphincter of Oddi manometry in routine clinical practice.  Endoscopy. 1991;  23 139-143
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Allescher H D. Clinical impact of sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30, Suppl 2 231-236
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Tzovaras G, Rowlands B J. Diagnosis and treatment of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.  Br J Surg. 1998;  85 588-595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Albert M B, Steinberg W M, Irani S K. Severe acute pancreatitis complicating sphincter of Oddi manometry.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;  34 342-345
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 King C E, Kalvaria I, Suinsky C A. Pancreatitis due to endoscopic biliary manometry. Proceed with caution (abstract).  Gastroenterology. 1988;  94 227
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rolny P, Anderberg B, Ihse I, et al. Pancreatitis after sphincter of Oddi manometry.  Gut. 1990;  31 821-824
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Scicchitano J, Saccone G T, Baker R A, et al. How safe is endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry?.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995;  10 334-336
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wehrmann T, Wendler O G, Jung M, Caspary W F. Risk factors of endoscopic manometry in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1997;  122 808-814
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Meshkinpour H, Kay L, Mollot M. The role of the flow-rate of the pneumohydraulic system on post-sphincter of Oddi manometry.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;  14 236-239
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Maldonado M E, Brady P G, Mamel J J, Robinson B. Incidence of pancreatitis in patients undergoing sphincter of Oddi manometry.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 387-390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Sherman S, Hawes R H, Troiano F P, Lehman G A. Pancreatitis following bile duct sphincter of Oddi manometry. Utility of the aspirating catheter.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 347-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ladas S D, Tassios P S, Katsogridakis J, et al. The clinical need for sphincter of Oddi manometry in gastrointestinal endoscopy units.  Endoscopy. 1993;  25 387-391
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Goff J S. Effect of propofol on human sphincter of Oddi.  Dig Dis Sci. 1995;  40 2364-2367
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Schmitt T H, Seifert H, Dietrich C F, et al. Sedation with propofol during endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry.  Z Gastroenterol. 1999;  37 219-227
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Wehrmann T, Lembcke B, Caspary W F, Seifert H. Intravenous sedation with propofol during routine ERCP. A prospective, randomized trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 677-683
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cotton P B, Lehman G A, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management. An attempt at consensus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 383-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Wehrmann T, Marek S, Hanisch E, et al. Causes and management of recurrent biliary pain after successful nonoperative gallstone treatment.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;  92 132-138
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Guelrud M, Mendoza S, Rossiter G, Villegas M I. Sphincter of Oddi manometry in healthy volunteers.  Dig Dis Sci. 1990;  35 38-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Wehrmann T, Seifert H, Hagenmüller F, et al. Endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry - does scepticism vanish?.  Z Gastroenterol. 1996;  34 17-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Thune A, Sciccitano I, Roberts-Thomson I, Toouli J. Reproducibility of endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry.  Dig Dis Sci. 1991;  36 1401-1405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.  Lancet. 1986;  i 307-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Wehrmann T, Seifert H, Seipp M, et al. Endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin for biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 702-707
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Geenen J E, Hogan W J, Dodds W J, et al. The efficacy of endoscopic sphincterotomy after cholecystectomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.  N Engl J Med. 1989;  320 82-87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Rolny P, Geenen J E, Hogan W. Post-cholecystectomy patients with objective signs of partial bile outflow obstruction: clinical characteristics, sphincter of Oddi manometry findings, and results of therapy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 778-781
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Botoman V A, Kozarek R A, Novell L A, et al. Long term outcome after endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with biliary colic and suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 165-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Bozkurt T, Orth K H, Butsch B, Lux G. Long term clinical outcome of post-cholecystectomy patients with biliary type pain: results of manometry, non-invasive techniques and endoscopic sphincterotomy.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;  8 245-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Wehrmann T, Wiemer K, Lembcke B, et al. Do patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction benefit from endoscopic sphincterotomy? A five year prospective trial.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;  8 251-256
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Smithline A, Hawes R, Lehman G. Sphincter of Oddi manometry: interobserver variability.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 486-491
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Tanaka M, Ikeda S. Sphincter of Oddi manometry: comparison of microtransducer and perfusion methods.  Endoscopy. 1988;  20 Suppl 1 184-188
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Tanaka M, Ikeda S, Nakayama F. Continuous measurement of common bile duct pressure with an indwelling microtransducer catheter introduced by duodenoscopy: new diagnostic aid for post-cholecystectomy dyskinesia - a preliminary report.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1983;  29 83-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Tanaka M, Ikeda S, Nakayama F. Nonoperative measurement of pancreatic and common bile duct pressure with a microtransducer catheter and effects of duodenoscopic sphincterotomy.  Dig Dis Sci. 1981;  26 545-552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Ochi T, Nakazawa S, Naito Y, Tsukamoto Y. Endoscopic manometry of the sphincter of Oddi and pancreatic duct in patients with papillary stenosis.  Endoscopy. 1991;  23 255-258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Laugier R. Dynamic endoscopic manometry of the response to secretin in patients with chronic pancreatitis.  Endoscopy. 1994;  26 222-227
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Gill R C, Kellow J E, Browning C, Wingate D L. The use of intraluminal strain gauges for recording ambulant small bowel motility.  Am J Physiol. 1990;  258 G610-G615
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Crowell M D, Bassoti G, Cheskin L J, et al. Method for prolonged ambulatory monitoring of high-amplitude propagated contractions from colon.  Am J Physiol. 1991;  261 G263-G268
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Dent J. Oesophageal manometry. In: Read NW (ed). Gastrointestinal motility - which test? . Petersfield; Wrighton Biomedical, 1989: 27-40
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Akkermans L MA. Esophageal manometry - microtransducers.  Dig Dis Sci. 1991;  36 Suppl 14-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Sundblad M, Hallbook O, Sjodahl R. Anorectal manometry with a microtransducer.  Eur J Surg. 1993;  7 365-370
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Patel R, Freeman J E, Hawes R H, et al. Catheters of sphincter of Oddi manometry: size may be important (abstract).  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 American Motility Society. Position paper: Sphincter of Oddi manometry.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  45 342-348
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

T. Wehrmann

Medizinische Klinik I Klinikum Hannover - Siloah

Roesebeckstrasse 15 30449 Hannover Germany

Fax: Fax+ 49-511-927-2560

Email: E-mail:siloahwe@sgh-net.de

      >