Dilation of Benign Strictures Following Low Anterior Resection Using Savary - Gilliard Bougies

Background and Study Aims: Benign anastomotic strictures occur in up to 22 % of patients after colorectal resections. Initially, treatment for these strictures was surgical, but nowadays endoscopic dilation techniques are preferred. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of dilation using Savary-Gilliard bougies.

Patients and Methods: From 1987 to 1994, 256 consecutive patients underwent low anterior resection (LAR). Twenty-one patients (8.2 %) developed a stricture of the colorectal anastomosis. Follow-up data were available for 18 of these patients. The patients were treated using endoscopic Savary dilation, with bougies of increasing diameters (10 - 19 mm). The mean follow-up period was 19 months (1 - 60 months).

Results: Stricture symptoms presented after a mean period of 7.7 months after LAR. In three of the 18 patients, the stenosis was caused by local recurrence, and these patients were excluded from further evaluation. Normal defecation was restored in 10 of the remaining 15 patients, and symptoms disappeared. In five patients, there was only partial improvement, but only three of them required another type of treatment. Of four patients who received radiotherapy and developed a strictured anastomosis, two had successful dilations. A normal defecation pattern was never regained if more than three dilations were necessary. No complications caused by Savary dilation were observed.

Conclusions: In this study population, Savary dilation appeared to be a safe and effective treatment for benign anastomotic strictures after LAR. All successfully treated patients (ten of 15) required no more than three dilations. Two other patients had partial success. Only three patients required another form of treatment (two endoscopic, one surgical).

References

• 1 Luchtefeld AM, Milsom JW, Senagore A, et al. Colorectal anastomotic stenosis: results of a survey of the ASCRS membership.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1989;  32 733-736
• 2 Balantyne GH. The experimental basis of intestinal suturing: effect of surgical technique, inflammation, and infection on enteric wound healing.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;  27 61-71
• 3 Polglase AL, Hughes ESR, McDermott FT, Burke FR. A comparison of end-to-end staple and suture colorectal anastomosis in the dog.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981;  152 792-796
• 4 Senagore A, Milsom JW, Walshaw RK, et al. Intramural pH: a quantitative method of predicting colorectal anastomotic healing.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;  33 175-179
• 5 Brain J, Lorber M, Fiddian-Green RG. Rectal membrane: an unusual complication following use of the circular stapling instrument for colorectal anastomosis.  Surgery. 1981;  89 271-274
• 6 Waxman BP. Large bowel anastomoses, 2: the circular staplers.  Br J Surg. 1983;  70 64-70
• 7 Oz MC, Forde KA. Endoscopic alternatives in the management of colonic strictures.  Surgery. 1990;  108 513-619
• 8 Virgilio C, Cosentino S, Favara C, et al. Endoscopic treatment of postoperative colonic strictures using an achalasia dilatator: short-term and long-term results.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 219-222
• 9 Dumon JF, Meric B, Sivak MV, Fleischer D. A new method of esophageal dilation using Savary-Gilliard bougies.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1985;  31 379-382
• 10 Rings EHHM, Mulder CJJ, Tytgat GNJ. The effect of bisacodyl on whole-gut irrigation in preparation for colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1989;  21 172-173
• 11 Wahab PJ, Mulder CJJ, den Hartog G, Thies JE. Argon plasma coagulation in flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy: pilot experiences.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 176-181
• 12 Jex RK, Van Heerden JA, Wolff BG, et al. Gastrointestinal anastomoses: factors affecting early complications.  Ann Surg. 1987;  206 138-141
• 13 Fasth S, Hedlund H, Svaninger G, Hulten L. Autosuture of low colorectal anastomosis.  Acta Chir Scand. 1982;  148 535-539
• 14 Fegiz G, Angelini L, Bezzi M. Rectal cancer: restorative surgery with the EEA stapling device.  Int Surg. 1983;  68 13-18
• 15 Kiisin MW, Cox AG, Wilkins RA. The fate of the EEA stapled anastomosis: clinico-radiological study of 38 patients.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985;  67 20-22
• 16 Bedogni G, Ricci E, Pedrazzolli C, et al. Endoscopic dilatation of anastomotic colonic stenosis by different techniques: an alternative to surgery?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1987;  33 21-24
• 17 Aston NO, Owen WJ, Irving JD. Endoscopic balloon dilatation of colonic anastomotic strictures.  Br J Surg. 1989;  76 780-782
• 18 Duce AM, Yebenes AB, Garces G, Gonzales-Bueno CM. Instrument for dilatation of stenotic colorectal anastomosis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;  33 160-161
• 19 Truong S, Willis S, Schumpelick V. Endoscopic therapy of benign anastomotic strictures of the colorectum by electroincision and balloon dilatation.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 845-849
• 20 Farin G, Grund KE. Technology of argon plasma coagulation with particular regard to endoscopic applications.  Endosc Surg. 1994;  2 71-77