J Reconstr Microsurg 2001; 17(2): 133-138
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-12702
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Double-Blind Randomized Study Evaluating Regeneration of the Rat Transected Sciatic Nerve after Suturing and Postoperative Low-Power Laser Treatment

Merav H. Shamir1 , Semion Rochkind2 , Judith Sandbank3 , Malvina Alon4
  • 1Koret School of Veterinary Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • 2Department of Neurosurgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University
  • 3Department of Rehabilitation, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University
  • 4Department of Pathology, Assaf Harofeh Hospital, Israel
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
31. Dezember 2001 (online)

ABSTRACT

This double-blind randomized study evaluated the therapeutic effect of low-power laser irradiation (LPLI) on peripheral nerve regeneration, after complete transection and direct anastomosis of the rat sciatic nerve. After this procedure, 13 of 24 rats received postoperative LPLI, with a wavelength of 780 nm laser, applied transcutaneously, 30 min daily for 21 consecutive days, to corresponding segments of the spinal cord and to the injured sciatic nerve. Positive somatosensory evoked responses were found in 69.2 percent of the irradiated rats (p = 0.019), compared to 18.2 percent of the non-irradiated rats. Immunohistochemical staining in the laser-treated group showed an increased total number of axons (p = 0.026), and better quality of the regeneration process, due to an increased number of large-diameter axons (p = 0.021), compared to the non-irradiated control group. The study suggests that postoperative LPLI enhances the regenerative processes of peripheral nerves after complete transection and anastomosis.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Sunderland S. Nerves and Nerve Injuries.  2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone 1978
  • 2 Mackinnon S E, Dellon A L. Surgery of the Peripheral Nerve. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc 1988
  • 3 Terzis J K, Smith K. The Peripheral Nerve: Structure.  Function and Reconstruction. New York: Raven Press 1990
  • 4 Gibson K L, Daniloff J K. Peripheral nerve repair.  Compend Contin Ed . 1989;  11 938-944
  • 5 Rodkey W G. Peripheral nerve surgery. In: Slatter D (ed): Textbook of Small Animal Surgery Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co 1993: 1135-1141
  • 6 Shores A. Peripheral nerve injury and repair. In: Bojrab M J (ed): Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger 1990: 50-59
  • 7 Ohshiro T, Calderhead R G. Progress in Laser Therapy. Selected Papers from the October 1990 ILTA Congress Chichester: John Wiley & Sons 1991
  • 8 Tuner J, Hode L. Low Level Laser Therapy. Clinical Practice and Scientific Background Sweden: Prima Books 1999
  • 9 Rochkind S, Ouaknine G E. New trends in neuroscience: low power laser effect on the peripheral and central nervous system.  Neurol Res . 1992;  14 2-11
  • 10 Van Breugel H H, Bar P R. HeNe laser irradiation affects proliferation of cultured rat Schwann cells in a dose dependent manner.  J Neurocytol . 1993;  22 185-190
  • 11 Wollman Y, Rochkind S. In vitro cellular processes sprouting in cortex microexplants of adult rat brains induced by low power laser irradiation.  Neurol Res . 1998;  20 470-472
  • 12 Wollman Y, Rochkind S, Simantov R. Low power laser irradiation enhances migration and neurite sprouting of cultured rat embryonal brain cells.  Neurol Res . 1996;  18 467-478
  • 13 Bolognani L, Volpi N. Low power laser in enzymology: reactivation of myosin ATPase by GaAs and HeNe pulsed lasers. In: Passarella S, Quadliariello E (eds): Basic and Applied Research in Photobiology and Photomedicine 1990: 21-42
  • 14 Friedmann H, Lubart R, Laulich I, Rochkind S. A possible explanation of laser-induced stimulation and damage of cell cultures.  J Photochem Photobiol . 1991;  11 87-91
  • 15 Karu T. Photobiological fundamentals of low-power laser therapy.  IEEE J Quant Elect . 1987;  23 1703-1715
  • 16 Rochkind S, Nissan M, Lubart R. The in-vivo nerve response to direct low-energy-laser irradiation.  Acta Neurochir (Wien) . 1988;  94 74-77
  • 17 Rochkind S, Barr-Nea L, Razon N. Stimulatory effect of He-Ne low dose laser on injured sciatic nerves of rats.  Neurosurgery . 1987;  20 843-847
  • 18 Rochkind S, Nissan M, Barr-Nea L. Response of peripheral nerve to He-Ne laser: experimental studies.  Laser Surg Med . 1987;  7 441-443
  • 19 Rochkind S, Vogler I, Barr-Nea L. Spinal cord response to laser treatment of injured peripheral nerve.  Spine . 1990;  15 6-10
  • 20 Buttemeyer R, Rao U, Jones N F. Peripheral nerve allograft transplantation with FK506: functional, histological and immunological results before and after discontinuation of immunosuppression.  Ann Plast Surg . 1995;  35 394-401
  • 21 Wehling P, Pak M, Cleveland S, Neiper R. The influence of bacterial collagenase on regeneration of severed rat sciatic nerves.  Acta Neurochir (Wien) . 1992;  119 121-127
  • 22 Evans D HL. Investigation on the nature of peripheral factors influencing the process of motor nerve regeneration.  J Comp Neurol . 1953;  99 561-597
  • 23 Mira J C. Quantitative studies of the regeneration of rat myelinated nerve fibers: variations in the number and size of regenerating fibers after repeated localized freezings.  J Anat . 1979;  129 77-93
  • 24 Lubart R, Friedmann H, Faraggi A, Rochkind S. Toward a mechanism of low energy phototherapy.  Laser Therapy . 1991;  3 11-13
  • 25 Kanofsky R. Singlet oxygen production by biological systems.  Chem Biol Interact . 1989;  70 1-28
  • 26 Rochkind S. The effect of low power laser irradiation on peripheral and central nervous system and possible explanation for this phenomenon. In: Passarella S, Quadliariello E (eds): Basic and Applied Research in Photobiology and Photomedicine 1990: 315-338
  • 27 Passarella S, Casamassima E, Quagliariello E. Quantitative analysis of lymphocyte-salmonella interaction and effect of lymphocyte irradiation by He-Ne laser.  Biochem Photobiol . 1991;  11 87-91
    >