Download PDF
Endoscopy 2001; 33(6): 501-506
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-15089
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Risk Factors Suggesting Malignant Transformation of Gastric Adenoma: Univariate and Multivariate Analysis

D. I. Park1 , P.-L. Rhee1 , J.-E. Kim1 , J. G. Hyun1 , Y.-H. Kim1 , H. J. Son1 , J. J. Kim1 , S. W. Paik1 , J. C. Rhee1 , K. W. Choi1 , Y. L. Oh2
  • 1 Division of Gastroenterology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 2 Division of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2001 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Background and Study Aims: Since gastric adenomas are precancerous lesions, polypectomy is necessary. However, there have been no reports suggesting factors capable of predicting malignant transformation of gastric adenomas removed by endoscopic snare polypectomy (ESP) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in Korea, a country in which gastric cancer is a major problem. The aim of this paper was to elucidate the risk factors suggesting malignant transformation of gastric adenomas removed by ESP or EMR at our center.

Patients and Methods: Between November 1994 and June 1999, 118 gastric adenomas diagnosed on the basis of endoscopy and histological examinations of the forceps biopsy specimens obtained were treated by ESP or EMR at our department. Factors capable of predicting malignancy were searched for in the endoscopy reports, still photographs, and histopathological findings.

Results: Eight of the 118 adenomas ultimately proved to have malignant foci. In the univariate analysis, four of the variables studied - location, histological type, surface redness, and degree of dysplasia - had a statistically significant relationship with malignant transformation. In the multivariate analysis, only the degree of dysplasia had a statistically significant relationship with malignant transformation.

Conclusions: These results suggest that a diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia in forceps biopsy material should be considered an absolute indication for ESP or EMR.

References

  • 1 Goldstein N S, Lewin K J. Gastric epithelial dysplasia and adenoma: historical review and histological criteria for grading.  Hum Pathol. 1997;  28 127-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nakamura T, Nakano G. Histopathological classification and malignant change in gastric polyps.  Am J Clin Pathol. 1992;  58 434-444
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Seifert E, Gail K, Weismuller J. Gastric polypectomy: long-term results (survey of 23 centers in Germany).  Endoscopy. 1983;  15 8-11
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Tomasulo J. Gastric polyps: histologic types and their relationship to gastric carcinoma.  Cancer. 1971;  27 1346-1355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Koch H, Viebahn B. The significance of polypectomy in the stomach.  Endoscopy. 1983;  15 144-147
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Stolte M. Clinical consequences of the endoscopic diagnosis of gastric polyps.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 32-37
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Stolte M, Sticht T, Eidt S, Ebert D, Finkenzeller G. Frequency, location, and age and sex distribution of various types of gastric polyp.  Endoscopy. 1994;  26 659-665
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Japanese Gastric Cancer Association .Japanese Classification of Gastric Cancer. 2nd English edition.  Tokyo; Kanehara 1998: 10-24
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Yamada T, Ichikawa H. X-ray diagnosis of elevated lesions of the stomach.  Radiology. 1974;  110 79-83
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rugge M, Correa P, Dixon M F, et al. Gastric dysplasia: the Padova international classification.  Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;  24 167-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cuello C, Correa P, Zarama G, et al. Histopathology of gastric dysplasia.  Am J Surg Pathol. 1979;  3 491-500
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Jass J R. A classification of gastric dysplasia.  Histopathology. 1983;  7 181-193
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Farinati F, Cardin F, Di Mario F, et al. Early and advanced gastric cancer during follow-up of apparently benign gastric ulcer: significance of the presence of epithelial dysplasia.  J Surg Oncol. 1987;  36 263-267
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Greene F L. Gastroscopic screening of the post-gastrectomy stomach: relationship of dysplasia to remnant cancer.  Am Surg. 1989;  55 12-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Weinstein W M, Goldstein N S. Gastric dysplasia and its management.  Gastroenterology. 1994;  107 1543-1545
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Fertitta A M, Comin U, Terruzzi V, et al. Clinical significance of gastric dysplasia: a multicentric follow-up study.  Endoscopy. 1993;  25 265-268
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Saraga E P, Gardiol D, Costa J. Gastric dysplasia: a histological follow-up study.  Am J Surg Pathol. 1987;  11 788-796
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tomasulo J. Gastric polyps: histologic types and their relationships to gastric carcinoma.  Cancer. 1971;  27 1346-1355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ming S C, Goldman H. Gastric polyps: a histogenetic classification and its relation to carcinoma.  Cancer. 1965;  18 721-726
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hay L J. Surgical management of gastric polyps and adenomas.  Surgery. 1956;  39 114-119
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Orlowska J, Jarosz D, Pachlewski J, et al. Malignant transformation of benign epithelial gastric polyps.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;  90 2152-2159
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Deppisch L M, Rona V T. Gastric epithelial polyps: a 10-year study.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1989;  11 110-115
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Seifert E, Elster K. Gastric polypectomy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1975;  63 451-456
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

 P.-L. Rhee, M.D.

Division of Gastroenterology
Samsung Medical Center

50 Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Gu

Seoul 130-710
Korea


Fax: Fax:+ 82-2-3410-3849

Email: E-mail:plrhee@smc.samsung.co.kr

      >