Single-Embryo Transfer

ABSTRACT

The high incidence of multiple pregnancy is a major side effect of assisted reproductive technology that has recently given rise to justified criticism from different sides. The reasons for the high incidence of multiple pregnancies are discussed and a brief review is given of the steps that have been proposed to solve or at least reduce the problem. In this article, attention is particularly focused on the prevention of twin pregnancies because in terms of perinatal morbidity and associated costs, they outweigh the effect of high-order multiple pregnancies when expressed in absolute figures. The only efficacious measure to reduce the incidence of twin pregnancies is a policy of single-embryo transfer. We report on our experience with elective single-embryo transfer in good prognosis patients (age <37 years, first two in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles and at least two embryos of high quality). About one-third of the couples meeting these criteria agreed to have a single embryo transferred, at least during their first IVF cycle. Pregnancy rates in women who had an elective single-embryo transfer (more than one high-quality embryo available) were only slightly lower than those in the group with elective double (i.e., more than two high-quality embryos available) transfer (37.9 vs. 40.0%) but the incidence of twins was 0.0 versus 27.1%. This strategy resulted in a substantial decrease of the twin pregnancy rate from 27.0 to 14.9%, without affecting the overall pregnancy rate. The conditions that are to be fulfilled before this policy can and will be applied on a large scale are discussed.

KEYWORD

ART - twin pregnancy - prevention - single-embryo transfer

REFERENCES

• 1 Nygren K G, Andersen A N. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1997; results generated from European registers by ESHRE.  Hum Reprod . 2001;  16 384-391
• 2 Adamson G D, Brzyski R G. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1997 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.  Fertil Steril . 2000;  7 641-653
• 3 Jones H W, Schnorr J A. Multiple pregnancies: a call for action.  Fertil Steril . 2001;  75 11-17
• 4 Fritz M A. A guest editorial: a little too much ``success''.  Obstet Gynecol Surv . 2001;  55 531-532
• 5 Pennings G. Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: multiple pregnancies: a test case for the moral quality of medically assisted reproduction.  Hum Reprod . 2000;  15 2466-2469
• 6 Templeton A, Morris J K. Reducing the risk of multiple births by transfer of two embryos after in vitro fertilization.  N Engl J Med . 1998;  339 573-577
• 7 Dhont M, De Sutter P, Ruyssinck G, Martens G, Bekaert A. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction: a case-control study.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1999;  181 688-695
• 8 Bergh T, Ericson A, Hillensjo T, Nygren K G, Wennerholm U B. Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982-95: a retrospective cohort study.  Lancet . 1999;  354 1579-1585
• 9 Baker H WG, Saunders D M, Tyler J PP. Difficulties in comparison of results between assisted reproductive technology clinics: an attempt to standardize reporting.  Reprod Technol . 2000;  10 103-111
• 10 Coetsier T, Dhont M. Embryo transfer and multiple gestation: avoiding multiple pregnancies in in-vitro fertilization: who's afraid of single embryo transfer?.  Hum Reprod . 1998;  13 2663-2670
• 11 Strandell A, Bergh C, Lundin K. Selection of patients suitable for one-embryo transfer may reduce the rate of multiple births by half without impairment of overall birth rates.  Hum Reprod . 2000;  15 2520-2525
• 12 Vilska S, Tütinen T, Hydén-Granskog C. Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth.  Obstet Gynecol Surv . 2000;  55 157-158
• 13 Gerris J, De Neubourg D, Mangelschots K. Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial.  Hum Reprod . 1999;  14 2581-2587
• 14 Gardner M K, Lane M. Culture and selection of viable human blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF?.  Hum Reprod Update . 1997;  3 367-382
• 15 Gardner D K, Lane M, Stevens J. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer.  Fertil Steril . 2000;  73 1155-1158
• 16 Huisman G J, Fauser B J M C, Eijkemans M JC, Pieters M E C H. Implantation rates after in vitro fertilization and transfer of a maximum of two embryos that have undergone three to five days of culture.  Fertil Steril . 2000;  73 117-122
• 17 Coskun S, Hollanders J, Al-Hassan S. Day 5 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a controlled randomized trial.  Hum Reprod . 2000;  15 1947-1952
• 18 Schnorr J A, Doviak M J, Muasher S J. Impact of a cryopreservation program on the multiple pregnancy rate associated with assisted reproductive technologies.  Fertil Steril . 2001;  75 147-151
• 19 Daya S, Gunby J, Hughes E G. Natural cycles for in-vitro fertilization: cost-effectiveness analysis and factors influencing outcome.  Hum Reprod . 1995;  10 1719-1724