Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2001; 34(4): 317-328
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-19678
Originalarbeit

Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Denture Frame Analyse nach Sato - Kephalometrische Werte einer mitteleuropäischen Population

Denture Frame Analysis - Cephalometric measurements in a Central European populationAleš G. Čelar, Josef. W. Freudenthaler, Antonia Pescheck
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 January 2002 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die vorliegende Arbeit befasst sich mit der Wertigkeit der Denture Frame Analyse bei Europäern, die in zwei früheren Studien untersucht wurde, nämlich bei 106 Patienten mit Angle Klasse I, II, III oder offenem Biss sowie bei 122 Patienten, die in die Gruppen Neutral-, Distal- und Mesialokklusion als auch offener Biss, Regelüberbiss und Tiefbiss eingeteilt wurden. Bei den meisten Messungen gab es signifikante Gruppenunterschiede (p<0,05). Die Denture Frame Analyse lieferte Hinweise, wie die Okklusionsebene ausgerichtet sein soll. Der Winkel zwischen Okklusionsebene und Mandibularebene differenzierte alle vertikalen Gruppen signifikant. Bei den horizontalen Gruppen waren der Winkel zwischen A-B-Ebene und Mandibularebene bzw. die Neigung des oberen Schneidezahnes zur A-B-Ebene signifikante Unterscheidungsparameter (p<0,05). Die Denture Frame Analyse differenzierte somit die horizontalen und vertikalen Gruppen.

Abstract

This article reviews the validity of the Denture Frame Analysis in Europeans investigated in two former studies using 106 subjects assigned to four groups (Angle Class I, II, III, anterior open bite) and 122 subjects assigned to neutro-, disto-, and mesiocclusion as well as normal overbite, open bite, and deep overbite. Significant differences among the groups were encountered for most of the measurements investigated (p<0.05). The Denture Frame Analysis indicated the occlusal plane orientation. The angle between occlusal plane and mandibular plane differentiated all vertical groups significantly. The horizontal groups differed significantly in the angle between A-B plane and mandibular plane, and in the inclination of the upper incisor to A-B plane (p<0.05). Therefore the Denture Frame Analysis distinuguished anteroposterior and vertical groups.

Schlüsselwörter

Denture Frame Analyse - Okklusionsebene - Mandibularebene

Key words

Denture Frame Analysis - occlusal plane - mandibular plane

Literatur

  • 1 Andersen W. S.. The morphology of the potential Class III skeletal pattern in the growing child.  Am J Orthod. 89 1986;  302-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Battagel J. M.. The aetiological factors in Class III malocclusion.  Eur J Orthod. 15 1993;  347-370
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Battagel J. M.. Identification of Class III malocclusion.  Eur J Orthod. 16 89 1994;  70-80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Baumrind S., Miller D., Molthen R.. The reliability of head film measurements.  Am J Orthod. 70 1976;  617-644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Björk A., Skieller V.. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible: a synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years.  Eur J Orthod. 5 1983;  1-46
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Čelar A. G., Freudenthaler J. W., Čelar R. M., Jonke E., Schneider B.. The Denture Frame Analysis: an Additional Diagnostic Tool.  Eur J Orthod. 20 1998;  579-587
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Čelar A. G., Freudenthaler J. W., Schneider B.. Cephalometric differentiation between vertical and horizontal malocclusions in 122 Europeans using the Denture Frame Analysis and standard measurements.   J Orofac Orthop/Fortschr Kieferorthop. 60 1999;  195-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Di Paolo R. J.. An individualized approach to locating the occlusal plane.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 92 1987;  41-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Di Paolo R. J., Philip C., Maganzini A. L., Hirce J. D.. The quadrilateral analysis: An individual skeletal assessment.  Am J Orthod. 89 1983;  19-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ellis E., McNamara A. Jr.. Components of adult Class III open-bite malocclusion.  Am J Orthod. 86 1984;  277-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Engel G., Spolter B. M.. Cephalometric and visual norms for a Japanese population.  Am J Orthod. 80 1981;  48-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Enlow D. H., Di Gangi D., McNamara  J. A., Mina M.. An evaluation of the morphogenic and anatomic effects of the functional regulator utilizing the counterpart analysis.  Eur J Orthod. 10 1988;  192-202
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Enlow D. H., Hans  M. G.. Essentials of facial growth.  W.B. Saunders Philadelphia; 1996: 77
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Finlay F. A., Richardson A.. Outcome prediction in open bite cases.  Eur J Orthod. 17 1995;  519-523
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Freudenthaler J. W., Čelar A. G., Čelar R. M.. Denture Frame Analyse-Posteriore Diskrepanz. Funktionelles Konzept nach Sato.  Info Orthod Kieferorthop. 26 1994;  359-370
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Freudenthaler J. W., Čelar A. G., Schneider B.. Overbite depth indicator and anteroposterior dysplasia indicator: The relationship between occlusal and skeletal patterns studied using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.  Eur J Orthod. 22 2000;  75-83
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ishikawa H., Nakamura S., Iwasaki H., Kitazawa S.. Seven parameters describing anteroposterior jaw relationships: Postpubertal prediction accuracy and interchangeability.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 117 2000;  714-720
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Jacobson A.. The „Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony.  Am J Orthod. 67 1975;  125-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Järvinen S.. Floating norms for ANB angle as guidance for clinical considerations.   Am Journal Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 90 1986;  383-387
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Järvinen S.. Relation of the Wits appraisal to the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal.   Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 94 1988;  432-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kim Y. H.. Overbite depth indicator with particular reference to anterior open-bite.   Am J Orthod. 65 1974;  586-611
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kirchner J., Williams S.. A comparison of five methods for describing sagittal jaw relationship.   Br J Orthod. 20 1993;  13-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lopez-Gavito G., Wallen T. R., Little R. M., Joondeph D. R.. Anterior open-bite malocclusion: A longitudinal 10-year postretention evaluation of orthodontically treated patients.  Am J Orthod. 87 1985;  175-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Marcotte M. R.. Biomechanics in orthodontics.  B.C. Decker Toronto; 99 1990: 17
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Marcotte M. R.:. Kurs Segmentierte Bogentechnik.  Studienzirkel Bad Liebenstein in Zusammenarbeit mit der Universität Jena, Oktober/2000
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Nanda S.. Patterns of vertical growth in the face.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 93 1988;  103-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Nanda S.. Growth patterns in subjects with long and short faces.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 98 1990;  247-258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Nanda R. S., Merrill R. M.. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 105 1994;  328-344
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Platou C., Zachrisson B.. Incisor position in Scandinavian children with ideal occlusion. A comparison with the Ricketts and Steiner standards.  Am J Orthod. 83 1983;  341-352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Ricketts R. M.. Diagnosis and treatment planning.  J Clin Orthod. 26 1992;  585-602
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sassouni V.. The face in five dimensions. West Virginia University Press Morgantown; 1962: 183-227
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Sassouni V.. A classification of skeletal facial types.  American Journal of Orthodontics. 55 1969;  109-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Sassouni V., Nanda S.. Analysis of dentofacial vertical proportions.  Am J Orthod. 50 1964;  801-823
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sato S.. Alteration of occlusal plane due to posterior discrepancy related to development of malocclusion - introduction to Denture Frame Analysis.  Bull Kanagawa Dent Col. 15 1987;  115-123
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sato S., Motoyanagi K., Suzuki T., Imasaka S., Suzuki Y.. Longitudinal study of the denture frame and its relationship with the development of skeletal malocclusions.  J Jpn Orthod Soc. 47 1988 a;  186-196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Sato S., Takamoto K., Suzuki Y. Posterior discrepancy and development of skeletal Class III malocclusion: its importance in orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusions.   Orthod Review. (Nov-Dec) 1988 b;  16-29
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Schudy F. F.. The Occlusal plane and the vertical dimension of the human face.  Armstrong Co Inc Houston; 1992 a: 127
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Schudy F. F.. The vertical dimension.  J Clin Orthod. 26 1992 b;  463-472
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Taylor C. M.. Changes in the relationship of nasion and point A.  Am J Orthod. 56 1969;  143-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Tollaro I., Baccetti T., Franchi L.. Craniofacial changes induced by early functional treatment of Class III malocclusion.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 109 1996;  310-318
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Trouten J. C.. 1983;  Morphologic factors in open bite and deep bite.  Angle Orthod. 53 1983;  192-211
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Viazis A. D.. Comprehensive assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationships.  J Clin Orthod. 26 1992;  673-680
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Williams S.. The morphology of the potential Class III pattern in the growing child.   Am J Orthod. 89 1986;  302-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Williams S., Melsen B.. Interplay between sagittal and vertical growth factors.  Am J Orthod. 81 1982;  327-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Zacchrisson B. U.. On excellence in finishing - part 1.  J Clin Orthod. 20 1986;  460-482
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. A. Čelar

Universitätsklinik für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde

Währinger Straße 25 a

A-1090 Wien

      >