Endoscopy 2002; 34(1): 69-72
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-19393
State of the Art Review

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Colon Polyps and Cancer

O.  Kronborg1
  • 1Dept. of Surgery A, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Further Information

Publication History





Publication Date:
14 August 2002 (online)

The superiority of colonoscopy to double-contrast barium enema in detecting neoplasia was finally demonstrated in 2000, but colonoscopic surveillance programs are still based on short-term observations and are mostly inadequate, despite the prospective design of the trials. The evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of virtual colonoscopy is in progress, but its appropriate place in clinical gastroenterology has not yet been defined. There is now solid evidence that screening with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) not only reduces the mortality from colorectal cancer, but also that the incidence is substantially reduced after removal of the precursor lesions. Feasibility studies for population screening are ongoing. A once-only sigmoidoscopy will probably not be an optimal method of screening, but may be added to a program with FOBT. Molecular stool screening is attractive, but still experimental. Colonoscopy is not attractive as an initial screening instrument, despite its high diagnostic accuracy, and should only be used for screening high-risk individuals. Genetic methods are playing an increasing role in defining prognostic markers for intestinal neoplasia, and it is recommended that information services should be established for the public. Chemopreventive studies have revealed that dietary fiber supplementation may not reduce the risk of adenomas; the opposite seems to be true for aspirin and non-aspirin NSAIDs, which are active in the early phase of carcinogenesis. New techniques for optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy have been introduced.

References

  • 1 Winawer S J, Stewart E T, Zauber A HG. et al . A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  342 1766-1772
  • 2 Sakashita M, Aoyama N, Maekawa S. et al . Flat, elevated and depressed subtypes of flat early colorectal cancers should be distinguished by their pathological features.  Int J Colorect Dis. 2000;  15 275-281
  • 3 Adachi M, Okinaga K, Muto T. Flat adenoma of the large bowel: re-evaluation with special reference to central depression.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 782-787
  • 4 Blumberg D, Opelka F G, Hicks T C. et al . Significance of a normal surveillance colonoscopy in patients with a history of adenomatous polyps.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 1084-1092
  • 5 Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R. et al . Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence.  Gut. 2001;  48 812-815
  • 6 Martínez M E, Sampliner R, Marshall J R. et al . Adenoma characteristics as risk factors for recurrence of advanced adenomas.  Gastroenterology. 2001;  120 1077-1083
  • 7 Lund J N, Scholefield J H, Grainge M J. et al . Risks, costs, and compliance limit colorectal adenoma surveillance: lessons from a randomised trial.  Gut. 2001;  49 91-96
  • 8 Kronborg O. Screening for early colorectal cancer.  World J Surg. 2000;  24 1069-1074
  • 9 Statens Institut for Medicinsk Teknologivurdering . Kræft i tyktarm og endetarm. Diagnostik og screening.  Medicinsk Teknologivurdering. 2001;  3 221-243
  • 10 Rasmussen M, Kronborg O. Flexible sigmoidoscopy in Denmark.  Ugeskr Laeger. 2001;  163 771-774
  • 11 Kato S, Fujii T, Koba I, Sano Y. et al . Assessment of colorectal lesions using magnifying colonoscopy and mucosal dye spraying: can significant lesions be distinguished?.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 306-310
  • 12 Tibble J A, Forgacs I, Bjarnason I, Przemioslo R. The effects of preassessment clinic on nonattendance rates for day-case colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 963-965
  • 13 Brown A L, Skehan S J, Greaney T. et al . Value of double-contrast barium enema performed immediately after incomplete colonoscopy.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;  176 943-945
  • 14 Britton I, Dover S, Vallance R. Immediate CT pneumocolon for failed colonoscopy: comparison with routine pneumocolon.  Clin Radiol. 2001;  56 89-93
  • 15 Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli F M. et al . Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  119 300-304
  • 16 Miao Y M, Amin Z, Healy J. et al . A prospective single centre study comparing computed tomography pneumocolon against colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal neoplasms.  Gut. 2000;  47 832-837
  • 17 Spinzi G, Belloni G, Martegani A. et al . Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 394-400
  • 18 Fletcher J G, Johnson D, Welch T J. et al . Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients.  Radiology. 2000;  216 704-711
  • 19 Mandel J S, Church T R, Bond J H. et al . The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  343 1603-1607
  • 20 Saito H, Soma Y, Nakajima M, Koeda J. et al . A case-control study evaluating occult blood screening for colorectal cancer with Hemoccult test and an immunochemical hemagglutination test.  Oncol Report. 2000;  7 815- 819
  • 21 Zappa M, Castiglione G, Paci E. et al . Measuring interval cancers in population-based screening using different assays of fecal occult blood testing: the district of Florence experience.  Int J Cancer. 2001;  92 151-154
  • 22 Kronborg O, Ugstad M, Fuglerud P. et al . Faecal calprotectin levels in a high risk population for colorectal neoplasia.  Gut. 2000;  46 795-800
  • 23 Johne B, Kronborg O, Toslashn H I. et al . A new fecal calprotectin test for colorectal neoplasia: clinical results and comparison with previous method.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001;  36 291-296
  • 24 Ahlquist D A, Skoletsky J E, Boynton K A. et al . Colorectal cancer screening by detection of altered human DNA in stool: feasibility of a multitarget assay panel.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  119 1219-1227
  • 25 McCallion K, Mitchell R MS, Wilson R H. et al . Flexible sigmoidoscopy and the changing distribution of colorectal cancer: implications for screening.  Gut. 2001;  48 522-525
  • 26 Imperiale T F, Wagner D R, Lin C Y. et al . Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  343 169-174
  • 27 Lieberman D A, Weiss D G, Bond J H. et al . Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  343 162-168
  • 28 Dowling D J, St John D JB, Macrae F A, Hopper J L. Irritable bowel syndrome, colitis and colorectal cancer: yield from colonoscopic screening in people with a strong family history of common colorectal cancer.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;  15 939-944
  • 29 Friedman S, Rubin P H, Bodian C. et al . Screening and surveillance colonoscopy in chronic Crohn's colitis.  Gastroenterology. 2001;  120 820-826
  • 30 Heiskanen I, Luostarinen T, Järvinen H J. Impact of screening examinations on survival in familial adenomatous polyposis.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;  35 1284-1287
  • 31 Advisory Committee on Cancer Prevention . Recommendations on cancer screening in the European Union.  Eur J Cancer. 2000;  36 1473-1478
  • 32 Position statement . Colorectal cancer screening in the UK: joint position statement by the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Physicians, and the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.  Gut. 2000;  46 746-748
  • 33 Hemminki K, Li X. Familial colorectal adenocarcinoma and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a nationwide epidemiological study from Sweden.  Br J Cancer. 2001;  84 969-974
  • 34 Gafà R, Maestri I M, Matteuzzi M. et al . Sporadic colorectal adenocarcinomas with high-frequency microsatellite instability: pathological features, hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression, and clinical outcome.  Cancer. 2000;  89 2025-2037
  • 35 Brueckl W M, Jung A, Wein A, Brabletz T. et al . Microsatellite instability in colorectal adenomas: relevance and clinical importance.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 2000;  15 189-196
  • 36 Planck M, Anderson H, Bladström A. et al . Increased cancer risk in offspring of women with colorectal carcinoma: a Swedish register-based cohort study.  Cancer. 2000;  89 741-749
  • 37 Lynch H T. Family information service and hereditary cancer.  Cancer. 2001;  91 625-628
  • 38 Bonithon-Kopp C, Kronborg O, Giacosa A. et al . Calcium and fibre in prevention of colorectal adenoma recurrence: a randomised intervention trial.  Lancet. 2000;  356 1300-1306
  • 39 Schatzkin A, Lanza E, Corle D. et al . Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  342 1149-1155
  • 40 Alberts D S, Martinez M E, Roe D J. et al . Lack of effect of a high-fiber cereal supplement on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  342 1156-1162
  • 41 Rodríguez L AG, Huerta-Alvarez C. Reduced risk of colorectal cancer among long-term users of aspirin and non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.  Epidemiology. 2001;  12 88-93
  • 42 Rodríguez L AG, Huerta-Alvarez C. Reduced incidence of colorectal adenoma among long-term users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a pooled analysis of published studies and a new population-based study.  Epidemiology. 2001;  11 376-381
  • 43 Jänne P A, Mayer R J. Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  342 1960-1968
  • 44 Brooker J C, Saunders B P, Shah S G, Williams C B. A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial.  Gut. 2000;  46 801-805
  • 45 Odori T, Goto H, Arisawa T. et al . Clinical results and development of variable-stiffness video colonoscopes.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 65-69
  • 46 Shah S G, Broker J C, Williams C B. et al . Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomized controlled trial.  Lancer. 2000;  356 1718-1722
  • 47 Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Iseki K. et al . Endoscopic piecemeal resection with mucosal saline injection of large sessile colorectal polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 697-700
  • 48 Suzuki H, Ikeda K. Endoscopic mucosal resection and full thickness resection with complete defect closure for early gastrointestinal malignancies.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 437-439
  • 49 Yoshikane H, Hidano H, Sakakibara A. et al . Feasibility study on endoscopic suture with the combination of a distal attachment and a rotatable clip for complications of endoscopic resection in the large intestine.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 477-480

O. Kronborg, M.D., F.R.C.S.

Surgical Department A · Odense University Hospital

5000 Odense C · Denmark

Fax: + 45-6591-9872

Email: ole.kronborg@ouh.fyns-amt.dk

    >