The Future of the Past in Aural Rehabilitation

ABSTRACT

Leaders in audiology feel that the millennium brings challenges to our field: turf battles for clients and for insurance reimbursement, dismal sensory aid use and satisfaction rates, and the ever-increasing threat of technology edging us out of jobs. The best response to these challenges is aural rehabilitation. Aural rehabilitation can cut to the core of what we need to do to rehabilitate our patients. Patients can find a hearing loss lifestyle that will allow them to live as a person with a hearing impairment, and not as a hearing-impaired person. Family members and hearing health care professionals must provide a nonstigmatizing and supportive atmosphere. Patients must recognize the impact of hearing loss on their life, develop the skills necessary to stay in conversations, and evolve a new social identity and be confident in it. The psychosocial research of the last decade would suggest that when we go above and beyond the provision of sensory aids and communication skill building, our patients can experience an improved quality-of-life. If we return to our rehabilitative roots and adopt these practices, our patients will experience greater satisfaction and success, and we will justly consider ourselves the professionals best suited to provide comprehensive hearing health care for life.

KEYWORD

Aural rehabilitation - psychosocial - communication strategies - quality-of-life

REFERENCES

• 1 Beethoven L V. Heiligenstadt Document.  Hamburg: Stadtbibliothek; 1802
• 2 Conran T J, Binzer S M. The Influence of Personal Beliefs in the Adaptation of Hearing Loss. Presented at the XXVII International Congress of Psychology, July 2000, Stockholm, Sweden
• 3 Ross M. When a hearing aid is not enough.  The Hearing Review . 2000;  7(9) 26-30
• 4 Kochkin S. MarkeTrak IV: correlates of hearing aid purchase intent.  The Hearing Journal . 1998;  51(1) 30-41
• 5 Kochkin S. MarkeTrak V: ``Why are my hearing aids are in the drawer'': the consumer perspective.  The Hearing Journal . 1997;  50(10) 49-52
• 6 Kochkin S. MarkeTrak V: baby-boomers spur growth in potential market, but penetration declines.  The Hearing Journal . 1999;  52(1) 33-48
• 7 American Academy of Audiology. `97 AAA marketing study.  Audiology Today . 1998;  10(1) 10-14
• 8 Gaeth J H. A history of aural rehabilitation. In: Henoch MA, ed. Aural Rehabilitation for the Elderly New York: Grune & Stratton 1979: 1-21
• 9 Binnie C A. Attitude changes following speechreading training.  Scand Audiol . 1977;  6 13-19
• 10 Madell J R, Pfeffer E B, Ross M, Chellappa M. Hearing aid returns at a community hearing and speech agency.  The Hearing Journal . 1991;  44(4) 18-23
• 11 Ross M. Aural rehabilitation revisited.  Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology . 1987;  XX 13-23
• 12 DiSarno N. Informing the older consumer-a model.  The Hearing Journal . 1997;  50(10) 49-52
• 13 Northern J, Meadows-Beyer C. Reducing hearing aid returns through patient education.  Audiology Today . 1999;  11(2) 10-11
• 14 Abrams H B, Hnath-Chisolm T, Guerreiro S M, Ritterman S I. The effects of intervention strategy on self-perception of hearing handicap.  Ear Hear . 1992;  13(5) 371-377
• 15 Hetu R, Lalonde M, Getty L. Psychosocial disadvantages associated with occupational hearing loss as experienced in the family.  Audiology . 1987;  26 141-152
• 16 Hetu R, Riverin L, Lalande N, Getty L, St.-Cyr C. Qualitative analysis of the handicap associated with occupational hearing loss.  Br J Audiol . 1988;  22 251-264
• 17 Hetu R, Riverin L, Getty L, Lalande N, St.-Cyr C. The reluctance to acknowledge hearing difficulties among noise-exposed workers.  Br J Audiol . 1990;  24 265-276
• 18 Hogan A. Hearing Rehabilitation for Deafened Adults-A Psychosocial Approach. Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers 2001
• 19 Knutson J F, Lansing C R. The relationship between communication problems and psychological difficulties in persons with profound acquired hearing loss.  J Speech Hear Disord . 1990;  55 656-664
• 20 Carlson J G, Hatfield E. Psychology of Emotion.  New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers 1992
• 21 Apollonio I, Carabellese C, Frattola L, Trabucchi M. Effects of sensory aids on the quality of life and mortality of elderly people-a multivariate analysis.  Age and Aging . 1996;  25(2) 89-96
• 22 Hogan A, Hawthorne G, Kethel L. Health-related quality-of-life outcomes from adult cochlear implantation: a cross-sectional survey.  (In press) Cochlear Implants International.
• 23 Ringdahl A, Grimby A. Severe-profound hearing impairment and health-related quality of life among post-lingual deafened Swedish adults.  Scand Audiol . 2000;  29(4) 266-275
• 24 Getty L, Hetu R. Rehabilitation: a long process full of obstacles. Presented at the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology Summer Institute, June 1995, Howey-in-the-Hills, Florida
• 25 Erdman S A. Counseling hearing-impaired adults. In: Alpiner JG McCarthy PA, eds. Rehabilitative Audiology: Children and Adults, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1993
• 26 Hetu R. Stigma associated with hearing loss: a description and its impact on audiological rehabilitation. Presented at the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology Summer Institute, June 1995, Howey-in-the-Hills, Florida
• 27 Oyer H J, Oyer E J. Adjustment to adult hearing loss. In: Orlans H, ed. Adjustment to Adult Hearing Loss San Diego: College-Hill Press 1985
• 28 Erdman S A, Demorest M E. Comparisons of husbands' and wives' perceptions of adjustment to hearing loss. Presented at the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology Summer Institute, June 1986, Lake Geneva, Wisconsin
• 29 Quall S, Bebout J M. Patient counseling skills: neglected necessity in hearing education?.  The Hearing Journal . 1989;  42(9) 11-20
• 30 Erler S. Social support and adjustment to acquired hearing loss. Presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Annual Convention, November 1996, Seattle, Washington
• 31 Hallberg LR-M, Barrenas M-L. Group rehabilitation of middle-aged males with noise-induced hearing loss and their spouses: evaluation of short- and long-term effects.  Br J Audiol . 1994;  28 71-79
• 32 Bebout J M. How dispensers can tip the scales in favor of amplification.  The Hearing Journal . 1992;  46(6) 13-21
• 33 Lao T zu. Tao Te Ching.  New York: Quality Paperback Book Club 1990
• 34 Hallberg LR-M, Passe U, Ringdahl A. Coping with post-lingual severe-profound hearing impairment: a grounded theory study.  Br J Audiol . 2000;  34 1-9
• 35 Demorest M E, Erdman S A. Development of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. J Speech Hear Disord .  1987;  52 129-143
• 36 Skinner M W. Hearing Aid Evaluation.  Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall 1988
• 37 Hogan A, Giles E, Stewart M. Group-based interventions in cochlear implant rehabilitation programs. Presented at the First International Adult Aural Rehabilitation Conference, May 2001, Portland, Maine
• 38 Noble W G. Why is hearing impairment so handicapping?. In: Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Rehabilitation and Prevention Sydney: University of New England, Armidale and Worksafe Australia 1991: 60-63
• 39 Noble W G. Hearing, hearing impairment, and the audible world: a theoretical essay.  Audiology . 1983;  22 325-338
• 40 Binzer S M. Increasing patient compliance through family involvement. Presented at the Illinois Speech-Language-Hearing Association Annual Convention, February 1996, Chicago, Illinois
• 41 Green R R. The future is in your hands.  Hearing Rehabilitation Quarterly . 1994;  19 9-12
• 42 Mauze E, Binzer S M, French-St. George M. Training consumer advocates of assistive listening devices. Presented at the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology Summer Institute, June 1994, Snowbird, Utah