Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2002; 23(4): 281-292
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-35801
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Assessment of AOS for Treatment Planning

Kirrie J. Ballard1 , Donald A. Robin2
  • 1Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
  • 2Department of Communicative Disorders, San Diego State University and Joint Doctoral Program in Language and Communication Disorders, University of California at San Diego and San Diego State University, San Diego, California
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 December 2002 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Assessment of speech involves profiling a disorder, possibly at multiple levels, as well as interpreting that information to determine direction for treatment. Assessment of perceptual, acoustic, and physiological characteristics of apraxic speech is discussed, identifying the specific information that is contributed at each level. A combination of methods is advocated because each level of analysis provides the clinician with unique information. Perceptual analyses identify deviations from normal-sounding speech, whereas acoustic and physiological analyses can help provide insight into the underlying cause of perceptual abnormality. The latter can also identify abnormality that may not be detected perceptually but may be interfering with performance. Applications of the different assessment levels and methods to developing treatments and measuring outcome are addressed.

KEYWORDS

Apraxia of speech - assessment - motor speech disorder

REFERENCES

  • 1 McNeil M R, Robin D A, Schmidt R A. Apraxia of speech: definition, differentiation, and treatment. In: McNeil MR, ed. Clinical Management of Sensorimotor Speech Disorders New York: Thieme 1997: 311-344
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Dogil G, Mayer J. Selective phonological impairment: a case of apraxia of speech.  Phonology . 1998;  15 143-188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Crary M A, Landess S, Town R. Phonological error patterns in developmental verbal dyspraxia.  J Clin Neuropsychol . 1984;  6 157-170
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Yorkston K M, Beukelman D R. Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech.  Tigard, OR: CC Publications; 1981
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Darley F L, Aronson A E, Brown J R. Clusters of deviant speech dimensions in dysarthria.  J Speech Hear Res . 1969;  12 462-496
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Darley F L, Aronson A E, Brown J R. Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria.  J Speech Hear Res . 1969;  12 246-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Dabul B L. Apraxia Battery for Adults-2. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Yorkston K M, Beukelman D R, Bell K R. Clinical Management of Dysarthric Speakers.  Boston, MA: Little Brown 1988
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Miller N. Pronunciation errors in acquired speech disorders: the errors of our ways.  Eur J Disord Commun. 1995;  30 346-362
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Eplin J, Kent R D. Reliability of auditory-perceptual scaling of dysarthria. In: Robin DA, Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR, eds. Disorders of Motor Speech: Assessment, Treatment, and Clinical Characterization Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes 1996: 145-154
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Ludlow C L, Bassich C J, Connor N P. An objective system for assessment and analysis of dysarthric speech. In: Darby JK, ed. Speech and Language Evaluation in Neurology: Adult Disorders Orlando, FL: Grune and Stratton 1985: 393-425
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Johns D F, Darley F L. Phonemic variability in apraxia of speech.  J Speech Hear Res . 1970;  13 556-583
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Odell K, McNeil M R, Rosenbek J C, Hunter L. Perceptual characteristics of consonant production by apraxic speakers.  J Speech Hear Dis . 1990;  55 345-359
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Haley K L, Bays G L, Ohde R N. Phonetic properties of aphasic-apraxic speech: a modified narrow transcription analysis.  Aphasiology . 2001;  15 1125-1142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Zyski B J, Weisiger B E. Identification of dysarthria types based on perceptual analysis.  J Commun Dis . 1987;  20 367-378
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Duffy J R. Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management.  St. Louis, MO: Mosby 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Leuschel A, Docherty G J. Prosodic assessment of dysarthria: effects of sampling task and issues of variability. In: Robin DA, Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR, eds. Disorders of Motor Speech: Assessment, Treatment, and Clinical Characterization Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes 1996: 155-178
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Kent R D, McNeil M R. Relative timing of sentence repetition in apraxia of speech and conduction aphasia. In: Ryalls JH, ed. Phonetic Approaches to Speech Production in Aphasia and Related Disorders Boston, MA: College-Hill Press 1987: 181-220
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Seddoh S, Robin D A, Sim H-S. Speech timing in apraxia of speech versus conduction aphasia.  J Speech Hear Res . 1996;  39 590-603
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Liss J M, Weismer G. Acoustic analysis in the study of motor speech disorders.  J Acoust Soc Am . 1992;  92 2984-2987
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Liss J M, Weismer G. Selected acoustic characteristics of contrastive stress production in control geriatric, apraxic, and ataxic dysarthric speakers.  Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics . 1994;  8 45-66
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 McNeil M R, Doyle P J, Wambaugh J L. Apraxia of speech: a treatable disorder of motor planning and programming. In: Nadeau SE, Gonzalez-Rothi LJ, Crosson B, eds. Aphasia and Language: Theory to Practice New York: Guilford Press 2000: 221-266
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Ballard K J, Granier J, Robin D A. Understanding the nature of apraxia of speech: theory, analysis, and treatment.  Aphasiology . 2000;  14 969-995
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Blumstein S E, Cooper W E, Goodglass H, Statlender S, Gottlieb J. Production deficits in aphasia: a voice-onset time analysis.  Brain Lang . 1980;  9 153-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Code C, Ball M J. Fricative production in Broca's aphasia: a spectrographic analysis.  Journal of Phonetics . 1982;  10 325-331
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kent R D, Rosenbek J C. Acoustic patterns of apraxia of speech.  J Speech Hear Res . 1983;  26 231-249
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pirello K, Blumstein S E, Kurowski K. The characteristics of voicing in syllable-initial fricatives in American English.  J Acoust Soc Am . 1997;  101 3754-3765
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Wambaugh J L, West J E, Doyle P J. A VOT analysis of apraxic/aphasic voicing errors.  Aphasiology . 1997;  11 521-532
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ballard K J. Treatment of Interarticulator Coordination in Apraxia of Speech. Poster presented at the Clinical Aphasiology Conference; May 29-June 2, 2001; Sante Fe, NM
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Ludlow C L, Bassich C J. The results of perceptual and acoustic assessment of two types of dysarthria. In: Berry WR, ed. Clinical Dysarthria San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press 1983: 121-154
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Ludlow C L, Bassich C J. Relationships between perceptual ratings and acoustic measures of hypokinetic speech. In: McNeil MR, Rosenbek JC, Aronson A, eds. The Dysarthrias: Physiology, Acoustics, Perception, Management San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press 1984: 163-196
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Kent R D, Weismer G, Kent J F, Rosenbek J C. Towards phonetic intelligibility testing in dysarthria.  J Speech Hear Dis . 1989;  54 482-499
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Bunton K, Weismer G. The relationship between perception and acoustics for a high-low vowel contrast produced by speakers with dysarthria.  J Speech Lang Hear . 2001;  44 1215-1228
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Theodorus D G, Murdoch B E, Ward E C. Laryngeal and respiratory dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. In: Murdoch BE, Theodorus DG, eds. Speech and Language Disorders in Multiple Sclerosis London: Whurr Publications 2000: 64-79
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Hageman C F, Robin D A, Moon J B, Folkins J W. Visuomotor tracking in neurogenic disorders. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention; November 19-23, 1992; 1993; San Antonio, TX
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Hageman C F, Robin D A, Moon J B, Folkins J W. Oral motor tracking in normal and apraxic speakers.  Clinical Aphasiology . 1994;  22 219-229
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Ballard K J, Robin D A. Apraxia: a disorder of developing or implementing movement patterns?. Paper presented at the Clinical Aphasiology Conference; May 27-31, 2000; Kona, Hawaii
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Robin D A, Bean C, Folkins J W. Lip movement in apraxia of speech.  J Speech Hear Res . 1989;  32 512-523
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Kent R D, Adams S G. The concept and measurement of coordination in speech disorders. In: Wallace SA ed. Perspectives on the Coordination of Movement North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers 1989: 415-451
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Itoh M, Sasanuma S, Ushijima T. Velar movements during speech in a patient with apraxia of speech.  Brain Lang . 1979;  7 227-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Fromm D, Abbs J H, McNeil M R, Rosenbek J C. Simultaneous perceptual-physiological method for studying apraxia of speech.  Clinical Aphasiology . 1982;  10 251-262
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Konno K, Sugishita M, Hirose H. Articulatory movements in apraxia of speech. In: Annual Bulletin No 21. Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics. University of Tokyo 1987: 177-191
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Ballard K J, Forrest K, Lamb A. Examination and treatment of inter-articulator coordination in acquired apraxia of speech. Paper presented at the Convention of the American Speech, Language, and Hearing Association; November 15-18, 2001; New Orleans, LA
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Ballard K J. Response generalization in apraxia of speech treatments: taking another look.  J Commun Disord . 2001;  34 3-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Wambaugh J L, Cort R C. Treatment for AOS: perceptual and VOT changes in sound productions. Poster presented at the Motor Speech Conference; 1998; Tucson, AZ
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Howard S, Varley R. Using electropalatography to treat severe acquired apraxia of speech.  Eur J Disord Commun . 1995;  30 246-255
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Katz W F, Bharadwaj S V, Carstens B. Electromagnetic articulography treatment for an adult with Broca's aphasia and apraxia of speech.  J Speech Lang Hear . 1999;  42 1355-1366
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Kent R D, Kent J. Task-based profiles of the dysarthrias.  Folia Phoniatr Logop . 2000;  52 48-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Robin D A, Moon J, Folkins J W. Kinematic analysis of apraxic speakers: are we measuring the wrong stuff?. Paper presented at the Clinical Aphasiology Conference; June 2-5, 1996; Newport, RI
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Flamme G A. Examination of the validity of auditory traits and tests.  Trends in Amplification . 2001;  5 111-138
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Shuster L I, Wambaugh J L. Perceptual and acoustic analyses of speech sound errors in apraxia of speech accompanied by aphasia.  Aphasiology . 2000;  14 635-651
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Kent R D. Hearing and believing: Some limits to the auditory-perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol . 1996;  5 7-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Gerratt B R, Till J A, Rosenbek J C, Wertz R T, Boysen A E. Use and perceived value of perceptual and instrumental measures in dysarthria management. In: Moore C, Yorkston K, Beukelman D, eds. Dysarthria and Apraxia of Speech: Perspectives on Management Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes 1991: 77-94
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Lisker L, Abramson A S. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements.  Word . 1964;  20 384-422
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

1 *In the more severe cases of AOS, when time for treatment is limited, or if the patient chooses, the clinician may select a treatment approach that focuses on compensation (e.g., alternative communication modes). Such treatments are not directly involved with influencing the motor speech system and so are not considered here.

      >