Download PDF
Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care 2002; 10(4): 213-216
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-39282
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

2nd Stage Unreamed Tibial Nailing after Conventional and Pinless Fixex

F. J. Seibert1 , F. Fankhauser1 , G. Peicha1 , C. Boldin1 , N. Stockenhuber1 , H. P. Hofer1 , F. Haas2
  • 1Department of Traumatology, Medical School Graz, Austria
  • 2Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical School Graz, Austria
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 May 2003 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose: Our own results after 2nd stage unreamed nailing of the tibia are evaluated and correlated with the literature.
Method: External fixation as well as unreamed tibial nailing is an accepted treatment option in lower leg fractures. Intramedullary implants are more comfortable for the patients, but not in every case is a primary nailing advisible. If immediate stabilisation is recommended external fixation is the safest way. On a second stage, after amelioration of local or general conditions, internal stabilisation is better tolerated during rehabilitation. During the last 8 years the AO-UTN (unreamed tibial nail) as method of choice was used in 230 lower leg fractures. A conversion to the UTN from either a pinless fixator (n =10) or a conventional external fixator (n=10) with bicortical Schanz’ screws was performed in 20 cases. Fracture classification according to the AO-classification: Pinless: 3 A, 6 B, 1 C and 3 ap II, 2 ap III and 4 closed soft tissue injuries; Fixex: 7 B, 3 C and 1 ap I, 2 ap II, 3 ap III and 3 closed soft tissue injuries.
Results: In the Pinless group there was a delay of 5.7 and in the Fixex group a delay of 9.9 days between primary fracture stabilisation and definitive treatment. As additional procedures we had in the pinless group: 2 × split skin grafting, 1 × free flap and secondary monorail callus distraction and 1 × exchange nailing after reaming. In the fixex group: 4 × shorthening of 1-2 cm, 1 × monorail callus distraction of 5 cm, 1 local flap and 1 free flap. The overall infection rate was 5 % (in the pinless group without adequate soft tissue reconstruction), whereas in the literature we found a rate up to 44 %. Nailing was performed as a one stage conversion procedure.



Conclusion: The standard external fixator seems to be advantageous concerning additional joint bridging possibilities. Adequate soft tissue repair seems to be much more important than the primary stabilisation method.

Key words

UTN - Unreamed tibial nailing - External fixation - Pinless fixator - Conversion procedure

References

  • 1 Alberts K A, Looghan G, Einarsdottir H. Open tibial fractures: faster union after unreamed nailing than external fixation.  Injury 1999;. 30;  8 519-523
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Anglen J, Aleto T. Temporary transarticular external fixation of the knee and ankle.  J Orthop Trauma. 1998;  12, 6 431-434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Antich-Adover P, MartiGarin D, Murias-Alvarez J, Puente-Alonso C. External fixation and secondary intramedullary nailing of open tibial fractures. A randomized, prospective trial.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1997;  79 433-437
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Behrens F, Comfort T h, Searls K, Denis F, Young J T. Unilateral external fixation for severe open tibial fractures. Preliminary report of a prospective study.  Clin Orthop. 1983;  178 111
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Byrd H S, Cienry G, Tebbets J B. The management of open tibial fractures with associated soft tissue loss: External fixation with early flap coverage. J Plast Reconstr.  Surg. 1981;  68 73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Court-Brown C M, McQueen M M, Quaba A A, Christie J. Locked intramedullary nailing of open tibial fractures.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1991;  73 959-964
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Court-Brown C M, Keating J F, Christie J, McQueen M M. Exchange intramedullary nailing; its use in aseptic tibial nonunion.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1995;  77 407-411
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Godina M. Early microsurgical reconstruction of complex trauma of the extremities.  J Plast Reconst Surg. 1986;  78 285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gustilo B, Anderson J P. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty five open fractures of long bones.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1976;  58 453-458
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Haas N, Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Frigg R, Tscherne H. A new solid unreamed tibial nail for shaft fractures with severe soft tissue injury.  Injury. 1993;  24 49-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hofer H P, Seibert F J, Schweighofer F, Paszicsnyek T. Der unaufgebohrte Tibiamarknagel (UTN) in der Behandlung von Unterschenkelfrakturen - erste Erfahrungen.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1994;  379 32-37
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Klemm K W, Borner M. Interlocking nailing of complex fractures of femur and tibia.  Clin Orthop. 1986;  212 89-100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Krettek C, Hass N, Schandelmaier P, Frigg R, Tscherne H. Der unaufgebohrte Tibianagel (UTN) bei Unterschenkelfrakturen mit schwerem Weichteilschaden.  Unfallchirurg. 1991;  94 579-587
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Rudolf J, Tscherne H. Aktueller Stand der operativen Technik für die unaufgebohrte Nagelung von Tibiaschaftfrakturen mit dem UTN.  Unfallchirurg. 1994;  97, 11 575-599
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Küntscher G. The Küntscher method of intramedullary fixation.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1958;  40 17-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Marshall P D, Saleh M, Douglas D L. Risk of deep infection with intramedullary nailing following the use of external fixators.  J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1991;  36, 4 268-271
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Mayr E, Braun W, Ruter A. Can unreamed tibial nailing replace external fixators in management of open tibial fractures?.  Chirurg. 1994;  65, 11 983-987
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Morgan-Jones R L, Burgert S, Richardson J B. Arthroscopic debridment of external fixator pin tracts.  Injury. 1998;  291 41-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Müller M E. Die umfassende Klassifikation der Frakturen der langen Röhrenknochen. In: Müller ME, Allgöwer R, Schneider R, Willenegger H (Hrsg.) Manual der Osteosynthese - AO-Technik. Springer Verlag, 1992; 144, 145
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Nowotarski P J, Turen C H, Brumback R J, Scarboro J M. Conversion of external fixation to intramedullary nailing for fractures of the shaft of the femur in multiple injured patients.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2000;  82 781-788
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ostermann P A, Knopp W, Josten G, Muhr G. Unreamed intramedullary nail or external fixator in complicated tibial fracture? A comparative analysis.  Chirurg. 1993;  64, 11 913-917
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Reminger A R, Magerl F. The pinless external fixator - relevance of experimental results in clinical applications.  Injury Suppl. 1994;  3, S-C 15-29
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Seibert F J, Schippinger G, Peicha G, Stockenhuber N, Bratschitsch G, Fankhauser F, Friedam H, Hofer H P. The AO unreamed tibial nail (UTN) - friend or foe?; experiences of over 150 cases.  SOT. 1999;  1, 22 9-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Seibert F J, Schippinger G, Bratschitsch G, Friedam H, Szyszkowitz R. Karbonrahmen - Lagerungs- und Repositionshilfe bei der Unterschenkelmarknagelung in unaufgebohrter Technik.  Unfallchirurg. 2000;  103 132-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Siebenrock K A, Gerich T, Jakob R P. Sequential intramedullary nailing of open tibial shaft fractures after external fixation.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997;  116 32-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Templeman D C, Thomas M, Varecka T h, Kyle R. Exchange reamed intramedullary nailing for delayed union and nonunion of the tibia.  Clin Orthop. 1995;  315 169-175
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Templeman D C, Gulli B, Tsukayama D T, Gustillo R B. Update on the management of open fractures of the tibial shaft.  Clin Orthop. 1998;  350 18-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Tscherne H, Oestern H J. Die Klassifizierung des Weichteilschadens bei offenen und geschlossenen Frakturen.  Unfallheilkunde. 1982;  85 111-115
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Weller S, Höntzsch D. Marknagelung des Femurs und der Tibia, Marknagelung mit dem „unaufgebohrten” AO-Tibiastab. In: Müller ME, Allgöwer R, Schneider R, Willenegger H (Hrsg). Manual der Osteosynthese - AO-Technik. Springer Verlag 1992; 358-365
    Google Scholar

F. J. Seibert, M.D. 

Department of Traumatology · University of Graz

Auenbruggerplatz 7 a

8036 Graz

Austria

Phone: +43/3 16/3 85-21 55

Fax: +43/3 16/3 85-35 82

Email: franz.seibert@kfunigraz.ac.at

      >