Follow-Up of Children with Cerebral Palsy after Selective Posterior Rhizotomy with Intensive Physiotherapy or Physiotherapy Alone

H. Mäenpää; T. Salokorpi; R. Jaakkola; G. Blomstedt; K. Sainio; J. Merikanto; L. von Wendt

doi:10.1055/s-2003-39598

Neuropediatrics, Table of Contents

Neuropediatrics 2003; 34(2): 67-71
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-39598

Original Article

Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Follow-Up of Children with Cerebral Palsy after Selective Posterior Rhizotomy with Intensive Physiotherapy or Physiotherapy Alone

H. Mäenpää¹ , T. Salokorpi¹ , R. Jaakkola¹ , G. Blomstedt² , K. Sainio³ , J. Merikanto⁴ , L. von Wendt¹

¹Paediatric Neurology, The Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Helsinki, Finland
²Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
³Clinical Neurophysiology, Laboratory Diagnostics, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
⁴Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

Abstract

In all 21 children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) underwent surgery involving selective posterior rhizotomy (SPR), followed by six months intensive physiotherapy (PT). Neurological and physiotherapeutic assessments were made one, three and five years after the operation. The children undergoing surgery were compared to 21 comparison children who took part in a regular physiotherapy programme during the same time period. At the preoperative assessment, the children undergoing surgery were similar to the comparative children in terms of age, sex, type of CP, spasticity of the legs and mean functional scores. The children were selected for SPR on the basis of more than half a year's arrest of motor development, which was the only significant difference to the comparative group. Motor function was measured using two different methods, the Illinois-St Louis Scale and the Gross Motor Functional Classification System (GMFC). Both groups experienced steady development during the five-year follow-up period and no significant differences were observed in the mean functional scores between the groups. We conclude that this comparative study, like most controlled studies, failed to demonstrate any additional effect of SPR on motor development of children with spastic CP. Nevertheless, SPR may contribute to a resumption of motor development in children with arrested motor development despite vigorous conservative therapy. SPR is therefore justified as treatment in selected cases.

Key words

Cerebral palsy - rhizotomy - spasticity

Full Text

References

1 Abbott R, Forem S L, Johann M. Selective posterior rhizotomy for the treatment of spasticity: a review. Child's Nerv Syst. 1989; 5 337-346
2 Albright A L, Barry M J, Fasick M P, Janosky J. Effects of continuous intrathecal baclofen infusion and selective posterior rhizotomy on upper extremity spasticity. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1995; 23 82-85
3 Ashworth B. Preliminary trial of carisoprodal in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner. 1964; 192 540-542
4 Beck A J, Caskill S J, Marlin A E. Improvement in upper extremity function and trunk control after selective posterior rhizotomy. Am J Occup Ther. 1993; 47 704-707
5 Berman B, Vaughan C L, Peacock W J. The effect of rhizotomy on movement in patients with cerebral palsy. Am J Occup Ther. 1990; 44 511-516
6 Bloom K K, Nazar G B. Functional assessment following selective posterior rhizotomy in spastic cerebral palsy. Child's Nerv Syst. 1994; 10 84-86
7 Bobath K, Bobath B. The neurodevelopmental treatment. Scrutton D Management of the Motor Disorders of Cerebral Palsy, Clinics in Developmental Medicine. No 90. London; William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd 1984
8 Bohannon R W, Smith M B. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987; 67 206-207
9 Bower E, Michell D, McLellan D L, Burnett M, Campbell M J. A randomized controlled trial of different intensities of physiotherapy and collaborative goal setting in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000; 83 (Suppl) 34
10 Dudgeon B J, Libby A K, McLaughlin J F, Hays R M, Bjornson K F, Roberts T S. Prospective measurement of functional changes after selective dorsal rhizotomy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75 46-53
11 Fasano V A, Barolat-Romana G, Zeme S, Squazzi A. Electrophysiological assessment of spinal circuits in spasticity by direct dorsal root stimulation. Neurosurg. 1979; 4 146-151
12 Loewen P, Steinbok P, Holsti L, MacKay M. Upper extremity performance and self-care skill changes in children with spastic cerebral palsy following selective posterior rhizotomy. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1998; 29 191-198
13 Lundberg A, Roos A, von Wendt L, Ahlander A C. Joint Scandinavian follow-up is valuable for lumbosacral rhizotomy. (Swedish). Läkartidningen. 1993; 90 2116
14 McLaughlin J F, Bjornson K F, Astley S J. et al . Selective dorsal rhizotomy: efficacy and safety in an investigator-masked randomized clinical trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998; 40 220-232
15 McLaughlin J F, Bjornson K F, Temkin N, Steinbok P, Wright F V, Reiner A M. et al . Selective dorsal rhizotomy: meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002; 44 17-25
16 Montgomery P C. A clinical report of long-term outcomes following selective posterior rhizotomy: implications for selection, follow-up, and research. Phys Occup Ther Pediatrics. 1992; 12 69-87
17 Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. GMFC, Gross Motor Function Classification System. User Instructions. Neurodevelopmental Clinical Research Unit. Hamilton; McMaster University 1995
18 Patrick J H, Roberts A P, Cole G F. Therapeutic choices in the locomotor management of the child with cerebral palsy - more luck than judgement?. Arch Dis Child. 2001; 85 275-279
19 Peacock and Arens W JLJ. Selective posterior rhizotomy for the relief of spasticity in cerebral palsy. South Afr Med J. 1982; 62 119-124
20 Peacock W J, Arens L J, Berman B. Cerebral palsy spasticity. Selective posterior rhizotomy Pediatr Neurosci. 1987; 13 61-66
21 Peacock W J, Staudt L A. Spasticity in cerebral palsy and the selective posterior rhizotomy procedure. J Child Neurol. 1990; 5 179-185
22 Peacock W J, Staudt L A. Selective posterior rhizotomy: evolution of theory and practice. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1991; 17 128-134
23 Peter J C, Arens L J. Selective posterior lumbosacral rhizotomy for the management of cerebral palsy spasticity. A 10-year experience. South Afr Med J. 1993; 83 745-747
24 Russell D, Rosenbaum P, Gowland G. et al .Gross Motor Function Measure Manual. 2nd ed. Hamilton (Canada); Hugh MacMillan Rehabilitation Centre, McMaster University 1993
25 Steinbok P, Reiner A, Beauchamp R D, Armstrong R W, Cochrane D D. A randomized clinical trial to compare selective posterior rhizotomy plus physiotherapy with physiotherapy alone in children with spastic diplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997; 39 178-184
26 Steinbok P, Reiner A, Beauchamp R D, Cochrane D D, Keyes R. Selective functional posterior rhizotomy for treatment of spastic cerebral palsy in children. Review of 50 consecutive cases. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1992; 18 34-42
27 Steinbok P. Outcomes after selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy. Child's Nerv Syst. 2001; 17 1-18
28 Yang T F, Chan R C, Wong T T. et al . Quantitative measurement of improvement in sitting balance in children with spastic cerebral palsy after selective posterior rhizotomy. Am J Med Rehabil. 1996; 75 348-352
29 Wright F V, Sheil E, Drake J, Wedge J, Naumann S. Evaluation of selective dorsal rhizotomy for the reduction of spasticity in cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998; 40 239-247

Dr. H. Mäenpää

The Hospital for Children and Adolescents

PL 280 Huch

00029 Helsinki

Finland

Email: helena.maenpaa@hus.fi