ABSTRACT
Endometriosis is a common disorder of women of reproductive age, yet diagnosis of
this condition is often problematic. The most frequent clinical presentations of endometriosis
include dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, dyspareunia, infertility, and pelvic mass. However,
the correlation between these symptoms and the stage of endometriosis is poor. Currently
available laboratory markers are of limited value. At present, the best marker, serum
CA-125, is usually elevated only in advanced stages and therefore not suitable for
routine screening. Transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are often
helpful, particularly in detection of endometriotic cysts. Recently, transrectal ultrasound
and magnetic resonance imaging were shown to be valuable in detection of deep infiltrating
lesions, especially in the rectovaginal septum. Although direct assessment of endometriotic
foci at laparoscopy may be viewed as a “gold standard” for identifying endometriosis,
the correlation of laparoscopic observations with histological findings is often low.
Ultimately, diagnosis of endometriosis requires a careful clinical evaluation in combination
with judicious use and critical interpretation of laboratory tests, imaging techniques,
and, in most instances, surgical staging combined with histological examination of
excised lesions.
KEYWORDS
Endometriosis - laparoscopy - CA-125 - imaging techniques