Clinical Ethics in the Context of Language and Cognitive Impairment: Rights and Protections

Lynne C. Brady Wagner

doi:10.1055/s-2004-815581

Seminars in Speech and Language, Table of Contents

Semin Speech Lang 2003; 24(4): 275-284
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-815581

Clinical Ethics in the Context of Language and Cognitive Impairment: Rights and Protections

Lynne C. Brady Wagner

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Ethical dilemmas are particularly complex when a patient has a communication disorder. Questionable decision-making capacity can affect an individual's ability to participate in the informed consent process. When other cognitive impairments as well as language deficits are present, the risk of losing one's right to autonomy is greatly increased. Alternatively, the protection afforded those who are clearly incompetent may be limited if a person appears to have decision-making capacity but is unable to adequately process information. These challenges are illustrated in this article by use of clinical case descriptions. They also serve to demonstrate ways in which speech-language pathologists can provide the expertise needed to assist patients and medical teams in addressing these particular issues and ensuring patient autonomy.

KEYWORDS

Decision-making capacity - competence - neurological communication disorders

Full Text

References

REFERENCES

1 Beauchamp T L, Childress J F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press 1994
2 Appelbaum P S, Grisso T. Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med . 1988; 319 1635-1637
3 Brady L C, Kirschner K L. Ethical issues for persons with aphasia and their families. Topics Stroke Rehabil . 1995; 2 84-87
4 Tippett D C, Sugarman J. Discussing advance directives under the patient self-determination act: a unique opportunity of speech-language pathologists to help persons with aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol . 1996; 5 31-34
5 McCullough L B, Molinari V, Workman R H. Implications of impaired executive control functions for patient autonomy and surrogate decision making. J Clin Ethics . 2001; 12 397-405
6 Braunack-Mayer A, Hersh D. An ethical voice in the silence of aphasia: judging understanding and consent in people with aphasia. J Clin Ethics . 2001; 12 388-396
7 Freedman M, Stuss D, Gordon M. Assessment of competency: the role of neurobehavioral deficits. Ann Intern Med . 1991; 115 203-208
8 Reid-Proctor G M, Galin K, Cummings M A. Evaluation of legal competency in patients with frontal lobe injury. Brain Injury . 2001; 15 377-386
9 Marson D, Harrell L. Executive dysfunction and loss of capacity to consent to medical treatment in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry . 1999; 4 41-49
10 Jonsen A R, Siegler M, Winslade W J. Clinical Ethics, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill 1998
11 Towner H. In re Martin. Issues Law Med . 1996; 12 267-271
12 Annas G J. Informed consent, cancer, and truth in prognosis. N Engl J Med . 1994; 330 223-225
13 Lo B, Dornbrand L, Wolf L, Groman M. The Wendland case: withdrawing life support from incompetent patients who are not terminally ill. N Engl J Med . 2002; 346 1489-1493
14 Boyle R J. Determining patient's capacity to share in decision making. In: Fletcher JC, Lombardo PA, Marshall MF, Miller FG, eds. Introduction to Ethics, 2nd ed Hagerstown, MD: University Publishing Group; 1997
15 The SUPPORT Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA . 1995; 274 1591-1598
16 Hare J, Pratt C, Nelson C. Agreement between patients and their self-selected surrogates on difficult medical decisions. Arch Intern Med . 1992; 152 1049-1054
17 Lo B. Assessing decision-making capacity. Law Med Health Care . 1990; 18 193-201
18 White, B C. Competence to Consent. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 1994
19 Brady Wagner C L. Withholding and withdrawing tube feeding for persons with dysphagia: exploring complications of advance directives and the obligations of a rehabilitation team. Topics Stroke Rehabil . 2001; 8 56-59
20 Kagan A. Revealing the competence of aphasic adults through conversation: a challenge to health professionals. Topics Stroke Rehabil . 1995; 2 15-28
21 Carney M T, Neugroschl J, Morrison R S, Marin D, Siu A L. The development and piloting of a capacity assessment tool. J Clin Ethics . 2001; 12 17-23
22 Sharp H, Mills K. In response to “The development and piloting of a capacity and assessment tool.” J Clin Ethics . 2002; 13 165-167
23 Sharp H M. A commentary on “Ethical issues for persons with aphasia and their families.” Topics Stroke Rehabil . 1995; 2 84-87
24 Kirschner K L. Ethics in practice. Assessing decision-making capacity in a patient with nondominant hemisphere stroke. Topics Stroke Rehabil . 1994; 1 104-105
25 Benson F, Geschwind N. Aphasia and related disorders: a clinical approach. In: Mesulam M, ed. Principles of Behavioral Neurology Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 1985
26 Goodglass H. Understanding Aphasia. New York: Academic Press; 1993
27 Holzer J C, Gansler D A, Moczynski N P, Folstein M F. Cognitive functions in the informed consent evaluation process: a pilot study. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law . 1997; 25 531-540
28 Kim S Y, Karlawish J H, Caine E D. Current state of research on decision-making competence of cognitively impaired elderly persons. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry . 2002; 10 151-165
29 Kim S Y, Cox C, Caine E D. Impaired decision-making ability in subjects with Alzheimer's disease and willingness to participate in research. Am J Psychiatry . 2002; 159 797-802
30 Dymek M P, Atchison P, Harrell L, Marson D C. Competency to consent to medical treatment in cognitively impaired patients with Parkinson's disease. Neurology . 2001; 56 17-24
31 Krynski M D, Tymchuk A J, Ouslander J G. How informed can consent be?. <~>New light on comprehension among elderly people making decisions about enteral tube feeding. Gerontologist . 1994; 34 36-43
32 Dellasega C, Frank L, Smyer M. Medical decision-making capacity in elderly hospitalized patients. J Ethics Law Aging . 1996; 2 65-74
33 Wong J, Clare I, Holland A. The capacity of people with a “mental disability” to make a healthcare decision. Psychol Med . 2000; 30 295-306
34 Kagan A, Kimelman M. Informed consent in aphasia research: myth or reality?. Clin Aphasiol . 1995; 23 65-75
35 Zwiebel N R, Cassel C K. Treatment choices at the end of life: a comparison of decisions by older patients and their physician-selected proxies. Gerontologist . 1989; 29 615-621
36 Terry P B, Vettese M, Song J. End-of-life decision-making: when patients and surrogates disagree. J Clin Ethics . 1999; 10 286-293
37 Reimer M. How well do proxies represent the views of cognitively impaired patients?. AXON . 2000; 21 78
38 Sharp H M, Bryant K N. Ethical issues in dysphagia: when patients refuse assessment or treatment. Semin Speech Lang . 2003; 24 285-300
39 Stein J. The ethics of advance directives: a rehabilitation perspective. Am J Phys Med Rehabil . 2003; 82 152-157
40 Caplan A, Callahan D, Haas J. Ethical & policy issues in rehabilitation medicine. Hastings Cent Rep . 1987; 17 (suppl) 1-20
41 Powell T, Lowenstein B. Refusing life-sustaining treatment after catastrophic injury: ethical implications. J Law Med Ethics . 1996; 24 54-61
42 Mairs N. Waist High in the World. Boston: Beacon Press; 1996
43 Sharp H M. Ethical decision making in interdisciplinary team care. Cleft Palate Craniofacial J . 1995; 32 495-499