The “Sun Window” - A Simple and Effective Alternative to the Use of Background Contrast Material During Microvascular Anastomosis

Tzong-Bor Sun; Lee-Ping Hsu; Peir-Rong Chen

doi:10.1055/s-2004-815644

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Table of Contents

J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19(8): 567-570
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-815644

The “Sun Window” - A Simple and Effective Alternative to the Use of Background Contrast Material During Microvascular Anastomosis

Tzong-Bor Sun¹ , Lee-Ping Hsu² , Peir-Rong Chen²

¹Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital and School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
²Department of Otolaryngology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital and School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A new and simple alternative method, the “Sun window,” is introduced for creating a comfortable environment while doing microvascular anastomoses. A prospective randomized study, analyzing the anastomosis time for 34 free radial forearm flaps, was conducted to validate the effectiveness of this method. The time required for doing anastomoses with and without a “Sun window” are 8.74 ± 1.46 and 10.36 ± 1.20, respectively, p < 0.01. The results demonstrated that the “Sun window” is an effective method for promoting the patency rate and accuracy of microvascular anastomosis.

KEYWORDS

Sun window - background - microvascular anastomosis

Full Text

References

REFERENCES

1 Jones T R, Jones N F. Advance in reconstruction of the upper aerodigestive tract and cranial base with free tissue transfer. Clin Plast Surg . 1992; 19 819-831
2 Neligan P C, Mulholland S, Irish J. et al . Flap selection in cranial base reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg . 1996; 98 1159-1196
3 Sun T B, Lee T T, Chien S H. Surgical reconstruction for buccal cancer in eastern Taiwan. Tzu Chi Med J . 1999; 11 131-138
4 Talesnik A, Markowitz B, Calcaterra T. et al . Cost and outcome of osteocutaneous free-tissue transfer versus pedicled soft-tissue reconstruction for composite mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg . 1996; 97 1167-1178
5 Stern J R, Keller A J, Wenig B L. Evaluation of reconstructive techniques of oropharyngeal defects. Ann Plast Surg . 1989; 22 332-336
6 O'Brien B M, Henderson P N, Bennett R C. et al . Microvascular surgical technique. Med J Austr . 1970; 1 722-725
7 O'Brien B M, Morrison W A, Gumley G J. Principles and techniques of microvascular surgery. In: McCarthy JG, ed. Plastic Surgery Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1990: 412-473
8 Isogai N, Kamiishi H. Usefulness of the silicone microsurgical background. Plast Reconstr Surg . 1989; 84 366-367
9 Terzis J, Faibisoff B, Williams H B. Use of polyethylene bag background in microsurgical repair of peripheral nerves. Plast Reconstr Surg . 1974; 53 596-597
10 Rasheed T, Gordon D. Plastic innovations: background material for microvascular anastomosis. Br J Plast Surg . 1999; 52 159
11 Mulholland S, Boyd J B, McCabe S. et al . Recipient vessels in head and neck microsurgery: radiation effect and vessel access. Plast Reconstr Surg . 1993; 92 628-632