Semin Hear 2004; 25(2): 141-154
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-828665
Copyright © 2004 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Understanding Classroom Acoustic Solutions

Gary W. Siebein1
  • 1The Classroom Acoustics Group, School of Architecture, University of Florida, and Siebein Associates, Inc., Gainesville, Florida
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 May 2004 (online)

This article describes the use of new impulse response measures and observations in existing Florida classrooms to document the classroom infrastructure on speech perception in the rooms. A series of 120 computer model studies in virtual classrooms using state-of-the-art technology are presented that define how specific architectural acoustic variables affect speech perception in classrooms. Recommendations are proposed for schools to meet the new American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 12.60 Standard on Classroom Acoustics based on the measurements and observations in existing classrooms and the computer model studies. Ten practical methods to design schools that can provide the high-quality acoustical environments required in the ANSI standard are summarized in this article. The primary research for these recommendations consisted of recording acoustical measurements of reverberation time and background noise, as well as newer acoustical measurements based on impulse response techniques, in 56 actual classrooms. Observations of classroom situations occurred in a subset of these schools. Computer and physical models of more than 120 classrooms were constructed and tested with varying room finish materials and background noise levels to study the combined effects of these architectural items on speech perception in the model rooms. The primary recommendations concern air conditioning system selection and noise control techniques to minimize interference with listening, interior classroom acoustic design principles for maximizing speech perception, documentation of teaching methods and classroom arrangements that result in improving speech intelligibility, and other factors that affect speech perception that are related to school design and planning.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Knudsen V O, Harris C. Acoustical Designing in Architecture. New York; American Institute of Physics 1978
  • 2 Crandell C C, Smaldino J J, Flexer C. Sound Field FM Amplification: Theory and Practical Applications. San Diego, CA; Singular Publishing Group 1995
  • 3 Houtgast T, Steeneken H JM, Plomp R. Predicting speech intelligibility in rooms from the modulation transfer function.  Acustica. 1980;  46 60-72
  • 4 Bradley J S. Uniform Derivation of Optimum Conditions for Speech in Rooms (BRN 239). Ottawa, Canada; National Research Council Canada 1985
  • 5 Bradley J S. Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1986;  80 848-854
  • 6 Bradley J S. Relationships among measures of speech intelligibility in rooms.  J Audio Eng Soc. 1988;  46 396-405
  • 7 Haas H. The influence of a single echo on the audibility of speech.  J Audio Eng Soc. 1972;  20 146-159
  • 8 Lochner J P, Berger J F. The intelligibility of speech under reverberant conditions.  Acustica. 1961;  11 195-200
  • 9 Latham H G. The Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Speech Intelligibility-An Auditorium Acoustics Design Index.  Applied Acoustics. 1979;  , 0003-682X/79/0012-0253/320
  • 10 Bradley J S. Review of methods of measuring rooms for speech. Paper presented at: 113th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America Indianapolis, IN; May 1987
  • 11 Bradley J S, Reich R, Norcross S G. A just noticeable difference in C 50 for speech.  Appl Acoust. 1999;  58 99-108
  • 12 Veneklasen P S. Model techniques in architectural acoustics.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1970;  47 419-423
  • 13 Schroeder M R. A new method to measure reverberation time.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1965;  37 409
  • 14 Meyer E, Thiele R. Acoustical investigations in numerous concert halls and broadcast studios using new measurement techniques.  Acustica. 1956;  6 425-444
  • 15 Siebein G W, Kinzey B Y. Recent innovations in acoustical design and research. In: Cavanaugh WJ, Wilkes JA Architectural Acoustics: Principles and Practice. New York; John Wiley & Sons 1999
  • 16 Bradley J S. Experience with new auditorium acoustic measurements.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1983;  73 2051-2058
  • 17 Barron M. Auditorium Acoustics and Architectural Design. London; E & FN Spon 1993
  • 18 Siebein G W, Gold M A, Ermann M G, Walker J. Background noise levels in classrooms. Proceedings of the 137th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and the 2nd Annual Convention of the European Acoustics Association: Forum Acusticum [machine-readable data file] 1999
  • 19 Siebein G W, Gold M, Siebein G, Ermann M. Ten ways to provide a high quality acoustical environment in schools.  LHSSA 31. 2000;  376-384
  • 20 Acoustical Society of America .ANSI S12.60-2002. Acoustical performance criteria, design requirements and guidelines for schools New York; Melville 2002
  • 21 Gold M A, Lee H W, Siebein G W et al.. Classroom acoustics II: acoustical conditions in elementary school classrooms. Proceedings of the International Congress on Acoustics Seattle; Acoustical Society of America 1988: 2723-2724
  • 22 Siebein G W, Abbott P, Crandell C C et al.. Pilot studies of speech communication in elementary school classrooms: literature review and methods. Proceedings of Noise-Con 97 Washington, DC; The Institute of Noise Control Engineering of the USA, Inc 1997: 417-422
  • 23 Siebein G W, Lehde M, Lee H W et al.. Classroom acoustics III: acoustical model studies of elementary school classrooms. Proceedings of the International Congress on Acoustics Seattle; Acoustical Society of America 1998: 2725-2726
  • 24 Reich R, Bradley J. Optimizing classroom acoustics using computer model studies.  Canadian Acoustics. 1999;  26 15-21
  • 25 Egan M D. Architectural Acoustics. New York; McGraw Hill 1989
  • 26 Hasell M J, Siebein G W, Abbott P et al.. Classroom acoustics I: the acoustical learning environment: participatory action research in classrooms. Proceedings of the International Congress on Acoustics Seattle; Acoustical Society of America 1998: 2721-2722
  • 27 Finitzo-Heiber T, Tillman T. Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children.  J Speech Hear Res. 1978;  21 440-458
  • 28 Hodgson M. Experimental investigations of the acoustical characteristics of university classrooms.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1999;  106 1810-1819
  • 29 Cremer L, Muller H A. Principles and Applications of Room Acoustics, Vol. 1. (Theodore J. Schultz, Trans.) London: Applied Science Publishers 1982

Gary W Siebein

Siebein Associates, Inc.

625 NW 60th Street, Suite C, Gainesville, FL 32607

Email: gsiebein@siebeinacoustic.com

    >