Endoscopy 2005; 37(9): 833-839
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-870276
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Transesophageal Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) and Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) Biopsy: a Combined Approach in the Evaluation of Mediastinal Lesions

P.  Vilmann1 , M.  Krasnik2 , S.  S.  Larsen1 , G.  K.  Jacobsen3 , P.  Clementsen4
  • 1Dept. of Surgical Gastroenterology, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
  • 2Dept. of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
  • 3Dept. of Pathology, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
  • 4Dept. of Pulmonary Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 14 January 2005

Accepted after Revision 21 April 2005

Publication Date:
22 August 2005 (online)

Background and Study Aims: It would be desirable to develop minimally invasive methods of tissue diagnosis from lymph nodes as well as solid lesions in the mediastinum. The aim of the present study was to test the combined method of transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in the evaluation of mediastinal lesions.
Patients and Methods: EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA were compared in 33 patients, for the staging of lung cancer in patients with an established diagnosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 20) or for diagnosis of a suspicious mediastinal lesion in patients with suspected lung cancer (n = 13). EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA were unsuccessful in one patient each. The diagnoses were verified in 28 of the remaining 31 patients either at thoracotomy (n = 9) or during the clinical follow-up (n = 19).
Results: A total of 119 lesions were sampled by EUS-FNA (n = 59) and EBUS-TBNA (n = 60). EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA demonstrated cancer in 26 and 28 lesions, respectively, and benign cytology in 30 and 28 lesions, respectively. Suspicious cells were found in three and four lesions by EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA, respectively. When the 60 EBUS-TBNA samples were compared with the 59 EUS-FNA samples, 11 additional cancer diagnoses and three samples with suspicious cells were obtained by EBUS-TBNA that had not been obtained by EUS-FNA. Conversely, EUS-FNA diagnosed 12 additional cancer diagnoses, one suspicious and one specific benign diagnosis (sarcoidosis) in addition to EBUS-TBNA. With a combined approach (EUS-FNA + EBUS-TBNA) in 28 of the 31 patients in whom a final diagnosis was obtained in the evaluation of mediastinal cancer, 20 patients were found to have mediastinal involvement, whereas no mediastinal metastases were found in eight patients. The accuracy of EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA, in combination, for the diagnosis of mediastinal cancer was 100 % (95 % CI, 83 - 100 %).
Conclusions: EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA appear to be complementary methods. A combined approach with both EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA may be able to replace more invasive methods for evaluating lung cancer patients with suspected hilar or mediastinal metastases, as well as for evaluating unclear mediastinal or hilar lesions.

References

  • 1 American College of Chest Physicians; Health and Science Policy Committee . Diagnosis and management of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based guidelines. American College of Chest Physicians.  Chest. 2003;  123 D-G, 1S-337S
  • 2 Silvestri G A, Tanoue L T, Margolis M L. et al . The noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: the guidelines.  Chest. 2003;  123 147S-156S
  • 3 Simon G R, Wagner H,. American College of Chest Physicians . Small cell lung cancer.  Chest. 2003;  123 259-271
  • 4 Kamiyoshihara M, Kawashima O, Ishikawa S. et al . Mediastinal lymph node evaluation by computer tomographic scan in lung cancer.  J Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;  42 119-124
  • 5 Pieterman R M, van Putten J W, Meuzelaar J J. et al . Preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with positron-emission tomography.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  343 254-261
  • 6 Prenzel K L, Monig S P, Sinning J M. et al . Lymph node size and metastatic infiltration in non-small cell lung cancer.  Chest. 2003;  123 463-467
  • 7 Hujala K T, Sipila J I, Grenman R. Mediastinoscopy: its role and value today in the differential diagnosis of mediastinal pathology.  Acta Oncol. 2001;  40 79-82
  • 8 Vilmann P, Hancke S. A new biopsy handle instrument for endoscopic ultrasound guided biopsy.  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1996;  43 238-242
  • 9 Wiersema M J, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema L M. Evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy with endoscopic US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.  Radiology. 2001;  219 252-257
  • 10 Wallace M B, Silvestri G A, Sahai A V. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for staging patients with carcinoma of the lung.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  72 1861-1867
  • 11 Fritscher-Ravens A, Sriram P V, Bobrowski C. et al . Mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with or without previous malignancy: EUS-FNA based differential cytodiagnosis in 153 patients.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 2278-2284
  • 12 Gress F G, Savides T J, Sandler A. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonography, fine-needle aspiration biopsy guided by endoscopic ultrasonography, and computed tomography in the preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: a comparison study.  Ann Intern Med. 1997;  15 604-612
  • 13 Silvestri G A, Hoffman B J, Bhutani M S. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;  61 1441-1446
  • 14 Fritscher-Ravens A, Bohuslavizki K H, Brandt L. et al . Mediastinal lymph node involvement in potentially resectable lung cancer: comparison of CT, positron emission tomography, and endoscopic ultrasonography with and without fine-needle aspiration.  Chest. 2003;  123 333-335
  • 15 Larsen S S, Krasnik M, Vilmann P. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy of mediastinal lesions has a major impact on patient management in lung cancer disease.  Thorax. 2002;  57 98-103
  • 16 Mountain C F, Dresler C M. Regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging.  Chest. 1997;  111 1718-1723
  • 17 Schenk D A, Chambers S L, Derdak S. et al . Comparison of the Wang 19-gauge and 22-gauge needles in the mediastinal staging of lung cancer.  Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;  147 1251-1258
  • 18 Harrow E M, Oldenburg F A, Lingenfelter M S. et al . Transbronchial needle aspiration in clinical practice.  Chest. 1989;  96 1268-1272
  • 19 Shields T W. Surgical treatment of non-small-cell bronchial carcinoma. In: Shields TW (ed) General thoracic surgery. 4th ed. Baltimore; Williams and Wilkins 1994 2: 1159-1169
  • 20 Okamoto H, Watanabe K, Nagatomo A. et al . Endobronchial ultrasonography for mediastinal and hilar lymph node metastases of lung cancer.  Chest. 2002;  121 1498-1506
  • 21 Herth F, Becker H D, Manegold C, Drings P. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS): assessment of a new diagnostic tool in bronchoscopy for staging of lung cancer.  Onkologie. 2001;  24 151-154
  • 22 Kurimoto N, Murayama M, Yoshioka S. et al . Assessment of usefulness of endobronchial ultrasonography in determination of depth of tracheobronchial tumor invasion.  Chest. 1999;  115 1500-1506
  • 23 Shannon J J, Bude R O, Orens J B. et al . Endobronchial ultrasound guided needle aspiration of mediastinal adenopathy.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;  153 1424-1430
  • 24 Herth F, Becker H D, Ernst A. Conventional vs endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a randomized trial.  Chest. 2004;  125 322-325
  • 25 Krasnik M, Vilmann P, Larsen S S. et al . Preliminary experience with a new method of endoscopic transbronchial real-time ultrasound guided biopsy for diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lesions.  Thorax. 2003;  58 1083-1086

P. Vilmann, M.D., D.Sc.

Dept. of Surgical Gastroenterology D · Gentofte University Hospital ·

Niels Andersensvej 65 · 2900 Hellerup · Denmark

Fax: +39-77 76 29

Email: pevi@gentoftehosp.kbhamt.dk

    >