Endoscopy 2006; 38(7): 696-701
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-925373
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic markers of villous atrophy are not useful for the detection of celiac disease in patients with dyspeptic symptoms

S.  Lecleire1 , F.  Di Fiore1 , M.  Antonietti1 , G.  Savoye1 , F.  Lemoine2 , F.  Le Pessot2 , E.  Lerebours1 , P.  Ducrotté1
  • 1 Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, ADEN-EA3234/IFRMP23 Research Group, Rouen University Hospital Charles-Nicolle, Rouen, France
  • 2 Department of Pathology, Rouen University Hospital Charles-Nicolle, Rouen, France
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 22 December 2005

Accepted after revision 22 January 2006

Publication Date:
06 June 2006 (online)

Background and study aims: Celiac disease can manifest with nonspecific symptoms, including functional gastrointestinal disorders such as dyspepsia. The aim of our study was to assess the usefulness of duodenal endoscopic markers of villous atrophy for the selection of dyspeptic patients for histological assessment.
Patients and methods: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed in dyspeptic patients, in patients considered to be at risk of having celiac disease, and in healthy controls. At least three duodenal biopsies were performed for histological assessment of villous atrophy in all patients and controls. We looked for the following four duodenal endoscopic markers of celiac disease: reduction in the number of folds, scalloping of folds, mosaic-pattern mucosa, and nodular mucosa.
Results: A total of 175 people were enrolled (75 patients with dyspepsia; 75 patients who were ”at risk” of having celiac disease; and 25 healthy volunteers, or ”controls”). Of the dyspeptic patients, four had endoscopic markers of celiac disease with no histologically confirmed villous atrophy, while one patient without endoscopic markers was found to have Marsh type I villous atrophy. Of the patients at risk of having celiac disease, 16 had at least one endoscopic marker and 10/16 were found to have histological villous atrophy. In this group, the sensitivity and specificity of the endoscopic markers were 100 % and 90.8 % respectively. ”At-risk” patients with two or more endoscopic markers all had histologically confirmed villous atrophy. Neither endoscopic markers nor villous atrophy were found in any of the control patients.
Conclusions: Additional endoscopic markers are valuable for diagnosis in patients with clinical symptoms suggestive of celiac disease. In contrast, endoscopic markers of villous atrophy are not useful for selecting a subgroup of dyspeptic patients for screening for celiac disease by duodenal histological assessment. These patients should be screened using other protocols.

References

  • 1 Ciacci C, Cirillo M, Sollazzo R. et al . Gender and clinical presentation in adult celiac disease.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995;  30 1077-1081
  • 2 Corazza G R, Valentini R A, Andreani M L. et al . Subclinical coeliac disease is a frequent cause of iron-deficiency anaemia.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995;  30 153-156
  • 3 Lo W, Sano K, Lebwohl B. et al . Changing presentation of adult celiac disease.  Dig Dis Sci. 2003;  48 395-398
  • 4 Marsh M N. Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine: a molecular and immunobiologic approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity (”celiac sprue“).  Gastroenterology. 1992;  102 330-354
  • 5 Dickey W, Kenny B D, McMillan S A. et al . Gastric as well as duodenal biopsies may be useful in the investigation of iron deficiency anaemia.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;  32 469-472
  • 6 Ackerman Z, Eliakim R, Stalnikowicz R. et al . Role of small bowel biopsy in the endoscopic evaluation of adults with iron deficiency anemia.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 2099-2102
  • 7 Harewood G C, Holub J L, Lieberman D A. Variation in small bowel biopsy performance among diverse endoscopy settings: results from a national endoscopic database.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 1790-1794
  • 8 Brocchi E, Corazza G R, Caletti G. et al . Endoscopic demonstration of loss of duodenal folds in the diagnosis of celiac disease.  New Engl J Med. 1988;  319 741-744
  • 9 McIntyre A S, Ng D PK, Smith J A. et al . The endoscopic appearance of duodenal folds is predictive of untreated adult celiac disease.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 148-151
  • 10 Maurino E, Capizzano H, Niveloni S. et al . Value of endoscopic markers in celiac disease.  Dig Dis Sci. 1993;  38 2028-2033
  • 11 Dickey W. Diagnosis of coeliac disease at open-access endoscopy.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998;  33 612-615
  • 12 Dickey W, Hughes D. Prevalence of celiac disease and its endoscopic markers among patients having routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 2182-2186
  • 13 Bardella M T, Minoli G, Radaelli F. et al . Reevaluation of duodenal endoscopic markers in the diagnosis of celiac disease.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 714-716
  • 14 Dickey W, Hughes D. Disappointing sensitivity of endoscopic markers for villous atrophy in a high-risk population: implications for celiac disease diagnosis during routine endoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 2126-2128
  • 15 Oxentenko A S, Grisolano S W, Murray J A. et al . The insensitivity of endoscopic markers in celiac disease.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 933-938
  • 16 Talley N J, Stanghellini V, Heading R C. et al . Functional gastroduodenal disorders.  Gut. 1999;  45 S37-S42
  • 17 Bardella M T, Minoli G, Ravizza D. et al . Increased prevalence of celiac disease in patients with dyspepsia.  Arch Intern Med. 2000;  160 1489-1491
  • 18 Midhagen G, Jarnerot G, Kraaz W. Adult celiac disease within a defined geographic area in Sweden: a study of prevalence and associated diseases.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1988;  23 1000-1004
  • 19 Mylotte M, Egan-Mitchell B, McCarthy C F. et al . Incidence of coeliac disease in the West of Ireland.  BMJ. 1973;  1 703-705
  • 20 Holmes G K, Prior P, Lane M R. et al . Malignancy in coeliac disease: effect of a gluten-free diet.  Gut. 1989;  30 333-338
  • 21 Valdimarsson T, Lofman O, Toss G. et al . Reversal of osteopenia with diet in adult coeliac disease.  Gut. 1996;  38 322-327
  • 22 Vivas S, Ruiz De Morales J M, Martinez J. et al . Human recombinant anti-transglutaminase antibody testing is useful in the diagnosis of silent coeliac disease in a selected group of at-risk patients.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;  15 479-483
  • 23 Dieterich W, Ehnis T, Bauer M. et al . Identification of tissue transglutaminase as the autoantigen of celiac disease.  Nat Med. 1997;  3 725-726
  • 24 Dieterich W, Laag E, Schöpper H. et al . Autoantibodies to tissue transglutaminase as predictors of celiac disease.  Gastroenterology. 1998;  115 1317-1321
  • 25 Tesei N, Sugai E, Vazquez H. et al . Antibodies to human recombinant tissue transglutaminase may detect coeliac disease patients underdiagnosed by endomysial antibodies.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;  17 1415-1423
  • 26 Collin P, Kaukinen K, Vogelsang H. et al . Antiendomysial and antihuman recombinant tissue transglutaminase antibodies in the diagnosis of coeliac disease: a biopsy-proven European multicentre study.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  17 85-91
  • 27 Rostami K, Kerckhaert J, Tiemessen R. et al . Sensitivity of antiendomysium and antigliadin antibodies in untreated celiac disease: disappointing in clinical practice.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 888-894
  • 28 Tursi A, Brandimarte G, Giorgetti G M. Prevalence of antitissue transglutaminase antibodies in different degrees of intestinal damage in celiac disease.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;  36 219-221
  • 29 Tursi A, Brandimarte G, Giorgetti G M. et al . Low prevalence of antigliadin and anti-endomysium antibodies in subclinical/silent celiac disease.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 1507-1510

S. Lecleire, M.D.

Service d’Hépato-Gastroentérologie et de Nutrition

CHU Charles Nicolle · 1 Rue de Germont · 76031 Rouen · France

Fax: +33-2-35-15-16-23

Email: stephanelecleire@hotmail.com