Endoscopy 2006; 38(5): 470-476
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-925399
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Predictive Value of Magnification Chromoendoscopy for Diagnosing Invasive Neoplasia in Nonpolypoid Colorectal Lesions and Stratifying Patients for Endoscopic Resection or Surgery

M.  A.  Bianco1 , G.  Rotondano1 , R.  Marmo1 , M.  L.  Garofano1 , R.  Piscopo1 , A.  de Gregorio1 , L.  Baron2 , L.  Orsini1 , L.  Cipolletta1
  • 1Divisions of Gastroenterology and Pathology, Maresca Hospital, Torre del Greco, Italy
  • 2Section of Gastrointestinal Pathology, San Leonardo Hospital, Castellammare di Stabia, Italy
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 10 January 2005

Accepted after revision 4 October 2005

Publication Date:
09 May 2006 (online)

Background and Study Aims: In nonpolypoid colorectal lesions, the presence of irregular, distorted glands in the colon (a disrupted crypt pattern) on magnification chromoendoscopy (MCE) is strongly associated with submucosal invasive cancer. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability of MCE to differentiate between an invasive crypt pattern and a noninvasive crypt pattern, including nonneoplastic lesions, and to assess the ability of this MCE classification to predict invasiveness and allow patients to be selected for endoscopic resection or surgical resection.
Patients and Methods: In a prospective study including 1560 colonoscopies, 153 flat or depressed colorectal lesions were evaluated with MCE among 534 colorectal lesions; the remainder had a polypoid appearance. The pit pattern was classified as nonneoplastic (type II) or neoplastic (types III - V), and the latter was subdivided into noninvasive (types III or IV) or submucosally invasive (type V). Lesions with a nonneoplastic and noninvasive neoplastic appearance were resected endoscopically if technically feasible, whereas those with a type V pattern were resected surgically. The resection specimens were analyzed histologically in relation to the Vienna classification.
Results: Using this management strategy based on the pit pattern, 86 % (n = 70) of the type II lesions were hyperplastic; the remaining 11 had low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Type III and IV lesions (n = 58) represented either low-grade or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in 95 % of the cases. Three patients had sm1 (n = 2) or sm2/3 invasive cancers. Among the patients with type V lesions (n = 14), 11 had invasive cancers (four sm1 and seven sm2/3). Endoscopic differentiation based on the pit pattern thus had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 86 % and a negative predictive value of 96 % for distinguishing between nonneoplastic and neoplastic lesions. The pit pattern criteria for distinguishing between invasive and noninvasive neoplasia (including nonneoplastic lesions), and hence the choice between endoscopic and surgical resection, had a PPV of 79 % and a NPV of 98 %. Excluding nonneoplastic lesions, the NPV would be 95 %.
Conclusions: The endoscopic pit pattern on MCE has only a moderate predictive value for nonneoplastic lesions, so that leaving these flat hyperplastic lesions in place on the basis of the endoscopic magnification appearance alone cannot be generally recommended. However, MCE has a good predictive value for guiding management toward either endoscopic resection (if technically feasible) or surgical resection.

References

  • 1 Rembacken B J, Fujii T, Cairns A. et al . Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK.  Lancet. 2000;  355 1211-1214
  • 2 Saitoh Y, Waxman I, West A B. et al . Prevalence and distinctive biological features of flat colorectal adenomas in a North American population.  Gastroenterology. 2001;  120 1657-1665
  • 3 Hurlstone D P, Fujii T, Lobo A J. Early detection of colorectal cancer using high-magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy.  Br J Surg. 2002;  89 272-282
  • 4 Tsuda S, Veress B, Toth E. et al . Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study.  Gut. 2002;  51 550-555
  • 5 Hurlstone D P, Cross S S, Adam I. et al . A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the UK.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 2543-2549
  • 6 Srivastava S, Verma M, Henson D E. Biomarkers for early detection of colon cancer.  Clin Cancer Res. 2001;  7 1181-1126
  • 7 Kiesslich R, von Bergh M, Hahn M. et al . Chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine improves the detection of adenomatous and nonadenomatous lesions in the colon.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 1001-1003
  • 8 Kato S, Fujii T, Koba I. et al . Assessment of colorectal lesions using magnifying colonoscopy and mucosal dye spraying: can significant lesions be distinguished?.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 306-310
  • 9 Kudo S, Rubio C A, Teixeira C R. et al . Pit pattern in colorectal neoplasia: endoscopic magnifying view.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 367-373
  • 10 Fujii T, Hasegawa R T, Saitoh Y. et al . Chromoscopy during colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 1036-1041
  • 11 Tung S Y, Wu C S, Su M Y. Magnifying colonoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic colorectal lesions.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 2628-2632
  • 12 Hurlstone D P. High-resolution magnification chromoendoscopy: common problems encountered in ‘‘pit pattern’’ interpretation and correct classification of flat colorectal lesions.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1069-1070
  • 13 Haggitt R C, Glotzbach R E, Soffer E E. et al . Prognostic factors in colorectal carcinomas arising in adenomas: implications for lesions removed by endoscopic polypectomy.  Gastroenterology. 1985;  89 328-336
  • 14 Kudo S, Kashida H, Tamura T. et al . Colonoscopic diagnosis and management of nonpolypoid early colorectal cancer.  World J Surg. 2000;  24 1081-1090
  • 15 Saitoh Y, Obara T, Watari J. et al . Invasion depth diagnosis of depressed type early colorectal cancers by combined use of videoendoscopy and chromoendoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 362-370
  • 16 Hurlstone D P, Cross S S, Adam I. et al . Efficacy of high magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy for the diagnosis of neoplasia in flat and depressed lesions of the colorectum: a prospective analysis.  Gut. 2004;  53 284-290
  • 17 Japanese Research Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum .Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma. Tokyo; Kanehara 1997
  • 18 The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58(6 Suppl) S3-43
  • 19 Lambert R, Provenzale D, Ectors N. et al . Early diagnosis and prevention of sporadic colorectal cancer.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 1042-1064
  • 20 Rubio C A, Jaramillo E, Lindblom A, Fogt F. Classification of colorectal polyps: guidelines for the endoscopist.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 226-36.
  • 21 Nagata S, Tanaka S, Haruma K. et al . Pit pattern diagnosis of early colorectal carcinoma by magnifying colonoscopy: clinical and histological implications.  Int J Oncol. 2000;  16 927-934
  • 22 Hamilton S R, Aaltonen L A, eds . World Health Organization .Classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. Lyons; IARC Press 2000
  • 23 Schlemper R J, Riddell R H, Kato Y. et al . The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal neoplasia.  Gut. 2000;  47 251-255
  • 24 Sackett L D, Straus S E, Richardson W S. et al .Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 2nd ed. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 2000: 252-266
  • 25 Konishi K, Kaneko K, Kurahashi T. et al . A comparison of magnifying and nonmagnifying colonoscopy for diagnosis of colorectal polyps: a prospective study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 48-53
  • 26 Togashi K, Konishi F, Ishizuka T. et al . Efficacy of magnifying endoscopy in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps of the large bowel.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 1602-1608
  • 27 Hurlstone D P, Cross S S, Drew K. et al . An evaluation of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection using high-magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 491-498
  • 28 Hurlstone D P, Cross S S, Brown S. et al . A prospective evaluation of high magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy in predicting completeness of EMR.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 642-650
  • 29 Yamamoto H, Kawata H, Sunada K. et al . Successful en-bloc resection of large superficial tumors in the stomach and colon using sodium hyaluronate and small-caliber-tip transparent hood.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 690-694
  • 30 Tamura S, Nakajo K, Yokoyama Y. et al . Evaluation of endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading rectal tumors.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 306-312
  • 31 Kiesslich R, Fritsch J, Holtmann M. et al . Methylene blue aided chromoendoscopy for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia and colon cancer in ulcerative colitis.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  124 880-888
  • 32 Rutter M D, Saunders B P, Schofield G. et al . Pancolonic indigo carmine dye spraying for the detection of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis.  Gut. 2004;  53 256-260
  • 33 Hurlstone D P, McAlindon M E, Sanders D S. et al . Further validation of high-magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia and colon cancer in ulcerative colitis.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  126 376-378
  • 34 Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M. et al . Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasia and colorectal cancer in vivo.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  127 706-713

L. Cipolletta, M. D. 

Hospital of Torre del Greco

Via Montedoro · 80059 Torre del Greco · Italy ·

Fax: +39-081-8490109·

Email: cipollet@tin.it

    >