Genetics of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Sony Sierra; Mary Stephenson

doi:10.1055/s-2006-931797

Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, Table of Contents

Semin Reprod Med 2006; 24(1): 017-024
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-931797

Genetics of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Sony Sierra¹ , Mary Stephenson²

¹Fellow, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
²Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Section of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a devastating reproductive problem affecting approximately 5% of couples trying to conceive. Genetic factors appear to be highly associated with reproductive loss. In this article, genetic factors are reviewed in terms of random numerical chromosome errors in miscarriage specimens and carriers of structural chromosome rearrangements that may result in unbalanced chromosome errors in pregnancies. Recently, research has generated interest in genetic markers for recurrent loss such as skewed X-chromosome inactivation and human leukocyte antigen-G polymorphisms. Assisted reproductive technologies (specifically, preimplantation genetic diagnosis) have been offered to couples with recurrent pregnancy loss; however, more data need to be evaluated before routine use can be advocated. Management of genetic factors in RPL should include therapy based on the highest level of evidence, genetic counseling, and close monitoring of subsequent pregnancies.

KEYWORDS

Recurrent pregnancy loss - recurrent miscarriage - cytogenetics - translocations - preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Full Text

References

REFERENCES

1 Stephenson M D. Recurrent pregnancy loss: clinical evidence for suboptimal implantation. Infert Reprod Med Clin N Am. 2001; 12 447-461
2 Boue J, Bou A, Lazar P. Retrospective and prospective epidemiological studies of 1500 karyotyped spontaneous human abortions. Teratology. 1975; 12 11-26
3 Edmonds D K, Lindsay K S, Miller J F, Williamson E, Wood P J. Early embryonic mortality in women. Fertil Steril. 1982; 38 447-453
4 Wilcox A J, Weinberg C R, O'Connor J F et al.. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1988; 319 189-194
5 Ohno M, Maeda T, Matsunobu A. A cytogenetic study of spontaneous abortions with direct analysis of chorionic villi. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77 394-398
6 Jacobs P A, Hassold T. Chromosome abnormalities: origin and etiology in abortions and livebirths. In: Vogel F, Sperling K Human Genetics. Berlin; Springer-Verlag 1987: 233-244
7 Simpson J L. Incidence and timing of pregnancy losses: relevance to evaluating safety of early prenatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet. 1990; 35 165-173
8 Neilson J, Wohert M. Chromosome abnormalities found among 34,910 newborn children: results from a 13-year incidence study in Arhus, Denmark. Hum Genet. 1991; 87 81-83
9 Hassold T, Chiu D. Maternal age-specific rates of numerical chromosome abnormalities with special reference to trisomy. Hum Genet. 1985; 70 11-17
10 Hawley R S, Frazier J A, Rasooly R. Separation anxiety: the etiology of nondisjunction in flies and people. Hum Mol Genet. 1994; 3 1521-1528
11 Martin R H, Ko E, Rademaker A. Distribution of aneuploidy in human gametes: comparison between human sperm and oocytes. Am J Med Genet. 1991; 39 321-331
12 Jacobs P A, Hassold T J. The origin of numerical chromosome abnormalities. Adv Genet. 1995; 33 101-133
13 Rubio C, Gil-Salom M, Simon C et al.. Incidence of sperm chromosomal abnormalities in a risk population: relationship with sperm quality and ICSI outcome. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16 2084-2092
14 Stephenson M D, Awartani K A, Robinson W P. Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case-control study. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17 446-451
15 Hassold T, Chen N, Funkhouser J et al.. A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet. 1980; 44 151-178
16 Stephenson M D. Frequency of factors associated with habitual abortion in 197 couples. Fertil Steril. 1996; 66 24-29
17 Boue A, Gallano P. A collaborative study of the segregation of inherited chromosome structural rearrangements in 1356 prenatal diagnoses. Prenat Diagn. 1984; 4(suppl) 45-67
18 Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozaki Y, Sato T, Suzumori N, Suzumori K. Poor prognosis of recurrent aborters with either maternal or paternal reciprocal translocations. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81 367-373
19 Goddijn M, Joosten J H, Knegt A C et al.. Clinical relevance of diagnosing structural chromosome abnormalities in couples with repeated miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19 1013-1017
20 Stephenson M D, Sierra S. Reproductive outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss associated with a potential carrier of a structural chromosome rearrangement. Fertil Steril. 2006; , (in press)
21 Carp H, Feldman B, Oelsner G, Schiff E. Parental karyotype and subsequent live births in recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81 1296-1301
22 Wolf G C, Horger III E O. Indications for examination of spontaneous abortion specimens: a reassessment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 173 1364-1368
23 Bell K A, Van Deerlin P G, Haddad B R, Feinberg R F. Cytogenetic diagnosis of “normal 46,XX” karyotypes in spontaneous abortions frequently may be misleading. Fertil Steril. 1999; 71 334-341
24 Lomax B, Tang S, Separovic E et al.. Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions. Am J Hum Genet. 2000; 66 1516-1521
25 Philipp T, Feichtinger W, Van Allen M I, Separovic E, Reiner A, Kalousek D K. Abnormal embryonic development diagnosed embryoscopically in early intrauterine deaths after in vitro fertilization: a preliminary report of 23 cases. Fertil Steril. 2004; 82 1337-1342
26 Ferro J, Martinez M C, Lara C, Pellicer A, Remohi J, Serra V. Improved accuracy of hysteroembryoscopic biopsies for karyotyping early missed abortions. Fertil Steril. 2003; 80 1260-1264
27 Lyon M. Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.) Nature. 1961; 190 372-373
28 Sangha K K, Stephenson M D, Brown C J, Robinson W P. Extremely skewed X-chromosome inactivation is increased in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Am J Hum Genet. 1999; 65 913-917
29 Uehara S, Hashiyada M, Sato K, Sato Y, Fujimori K, Okamura K. Preferential X-chromosome inactivation in women with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2001; 76 908-914
30 Lanasa M C, Hogge W A, Kubik C, Blancato J, Hoffman E P. Highly skewed X-chromosome inactivation is associated with idiopathic recurrent spontaneous abortion. Am J Hum Genet. 1999; 65 252-254
31 Beever C L, Stephenson M D, Penaherrera M S et al.. Skewed X-chromosome inactivation is associated with trisomy in women ascertained on the basis of recurrent spontaneous abortion or chromosomally abnormal pregnancies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003; 72 399-407
32 Robinson W P, Beever C, Brown C J, Stephenson M D. Skewed X inactivation and recurrent spontaneous abortion. Semin Reprod Med. 2001; 19 175-181
33 Ober C, Aldrich C L, Chervoneva I et al.. Variation in the HLA-G promoter region influences miscarriage rates. Am J Hum Genet. 2003; 72 1425-1435
34 Karhukorpi J, Laitinen T, Tiilikainen A S. HLA-G polymorphism in Finnish couples with recurrent spontaneous miscarriage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997; 104 1212-1214
35 Penzes M, Rajczy K, Gyodi E, Reti M, Feher E, Petranyi G. HLA-G gene polymorphism in the normal population and in recurrent spontaneous abortion in Hungary. Transplant Proc. 1999; 31 1832-1833
36 Pfeiffer K A, Fimmers R, Engels G, van der Ven H, van der Ven K. The HLA-G genotype is potentially associated with idiopathic recurrent spontaneous abortion. Mol Hum Reprod. 2001; 7 373-378
37 Aldrich C L, Stephenson M D, Karrison T et al.. HLA-G genotypes and pregnancy outcome in couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage. Mol Hum Reprod. 2001; 7 1167-1172
38 ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics .Management of recurrent early pregnancy loss. Number 24, February 2001. The 2005 Compendium of Selected Publications. Washington, DC; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2005
39 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists .The Investigation and Treatment of Couples with Recurrent Miscarriage. RCOG Guideline No. 17 2003 London: United Kingdom; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
40 Edwards R G, Gardner R L. Choosing sex before birth. New Scientist. 1968; 38 218-220
41 Harper J C, Coonen E, Ramaekers F C et al.. Identification of the sex of human preimplantation embryos in two hours using an improved spreading method and fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) using directly labelled probes. Hum Reprod. 1994; 9 721-724
42 Egozcue J, Santalo J, Gimenez C et al.. Preimplantation genetic screening and human implantation. J Reprod Immunol. 2002; 55 65-72
43 Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Evsikov S, Galat V, Kuliev A. Nuclear transfer for full karyotyping and preimplantation diagnosis for translocations. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002; 5 300-305
44 Munne S, Magli C, Cohen J et al.. Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14 2191-2199
45 Delhanty J D. Chromosome analysis by FISH in human preimplantation genetics. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12 153-155
46 Colls P, Blanco J, Martinez-Pasarell O et al.. Chromosome segregation in a man heterozygous for a pericentric inversion, inv(9)(p11q13), analyzed by using sperm karyotyping and two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization on sperm nuclei. Hum Genet. 1997; 99 761-765
47 Munne S, Morrison L, Fung J et al.. Spontaneous abortions are reduced after preconception diagnosis of translocations. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998; 15 290-296
48 Vidal F, Gimenez C, Rubio C et al.. FISH preimplantation diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidy in recurrent pregnancy wastage. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998; 15 310-313
49 Pellicer A, Rubio C, Vidal F et al.. In vitro fertilization plus preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with recurrent miscarriage: an analysis of chromosome abnormalities in human preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril. 1999; 71 1033-1039
50 Munne S, Sandalinas M, Magli C et al.. Inereased rate of aneuploid embryos in young women with previous areuploid conceptions. Prenat Diagnosis. 2004; 24 638-643
51 Verlinsky Y, Cohen J, Munne S et al.. Over a decade of experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a multicenter report. Fertil Steril. 2004; 82 292-294
52 Rubio C, Simon C, Vidal F et al.. Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18 182-188
53 Staessen C, Platteau P, Van A E et al.. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19 2849-2858
54 Platteau P, Staessen C, Michiels A, Van S A, Liebaers I, Devroey P. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in patients with unexplained recurrent miscarriages. Fertil Steril. 2005; 83 393-397
55 Clifford K, Rai R, Regan L. Future pregnancy outcome in unexplained recurrent first trimester miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12 387-389

Mary D StephensonM.D.

Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Section of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, University of Chicago

5841 South Maryland Avenue (MC 2050), Chicago, IL 60637

Email: mstephen@babies.bsd.uchicago.edu