Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2006; 19(1): 013-018
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-939526
Copyright © 2006 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Laparoscopy for Rectal Cancer: The Need for Randomized Trials

Thomas E. Read1 , Peter W. Marcello2
  • 1Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Clinical Campus of the Temple University School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • 2Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, Massachusetts
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 April 2006 (online)

ABSTRACT

The adoption of laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer has been relatively slow, primarily because of the technical difficulty of the procedure. The wide surgeon-to-surgeon variability in disease-free survival and local pelvic recurrence noted after open proctectomy is probably due to differences in surgical technique, and these differences are likely to be magnified when the additional challenge of laparoscopy is added to the procedure. At present, oncologic and functional outcomes data are limited. Although the adoption of laparoscopic techniques to perform curative proctectomy is likely to expand as technical challenges are overcome and experience and training improve, the results of prospective multicenter trials are necessary to ensure that the procedures provide an oncologic and functional outcome equivalent to that of conventional surgery.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Read T E, Myerson R J, Fleshman J W et al.. Surgeon specialty is associated with outcome in rectal cancer treatment.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 904-914
  • 2 Holm T, Johansson H, Cedermark B et al.. Influence of hospital- and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy.  Br J Surg. 1997;  84 657-663
  • 3 Porter G A, Soskolne C L, Yakimets W W et al.. Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer.  Ann Surg. 1998;  227 157-167
  • 4 Dahlberg M, Pahlman L, Bergstrom R et al.. Improved survival in patients with rectal cancer: a population-based register study.  Br J Surg. 1998;  85 515-520
  • 5 McCall J L. Total mesorectal excision: evaluating the evidence.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1997;  67 599-602
  • 6 Luna-Perez P, Reyna Huelga A, Labastida Almendaro S et al.. The surgeon as prognostic factor for local recurrence and survival in the anal sphincter preservation for mid-rectal cancer.  Rev Invest Clin. 1999;  51 205-213
  • 7 Dorrance H R, Docherty G M, O'Dwyer P J. Effect of surgeon specialty interest on patient outcome after potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 492-498
  • 8 McArdle C S, Hole D. Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival.  BMJ. 1991;  302 1501-1505
  • 9 Kapiteijn E, Marijnen C A, Nagtegaal I D et al.. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  345 638-646
  • 10 Nelson H, Fleshman J W, Marcello P W, Larson D W. A call to advance MIS for rectal cancer.  Contemp Surg. 2006;  62 19-25
  • 11 Pietrabissa A, Moretto C, Carobbi A et al.. Hand-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection: initial experience with a new procedure.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 431-435
  • 12 Kockerling F, Gastinger I, Schneider B et al.. Laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in the management of rectal carcinoma.  Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1993;  1 16-19
  • 13 Vithiananthan S, Cooper Z, Betten K et al.. Hybrid laparoscopic flexure takedown and open procedure for rectal resection is associated with significantly shorter length of stay than equivalent open resection.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 927-935
  • 14 Leung K L, Kwok S P, Lau W Y et al.. Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma.  Surg Endosc. 2000;  14 67-70
  • 15 Guillou P J, Quirke P, Thrope H et al.. Short-term endpoints of conventional vs. laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC-CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial.  Lancet. 2005;  365 1718-1726
  • 16 The COLOR Study Group . Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer.  Surg Endosc. 2005;  19 687-692
  • 17 Hyman N. How much colorectal surgery do general surgeons do?.  J Am Coll Surg. 2002;  194 37-39
  • 18 Ritchie Jr W P, Rhodes R S, Biester T W. Work loads and practice patterns of general surgeons in the United States, 1995-1997: a report from the American Board of Surgery.  Ann Surg. 1999;  230 533-542
  • 19 Wheeler H B. Myth and reality in general surgery.  Bull Am Coll Surg. 1993;  78 21-27
  • 20 Goldstein E T. Outcomes of anorectal disease in a health maintenance organization setting. The need for colorectal surgeons.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 1193-1198
  • 21 Schoetz Jr D J. Colon and rectal surgery: a true subspecialty.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;  41 1-10
  • 22 Heald R J, Moran B J, Ryall R D et al.. Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997.  Arch Surg. 1998;  133 894-899
  • 23 Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon M F et al.. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision.  Lancet. 1986;  2 996-999
  • 24 Dukes C. The surgical pathology of rectal cancer.  Proc R Soc Med. 1943;  37 131-144
  • 25 Karanjia N D, Corder A P, Bearn P et al.. Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 1224-1226
  • 26 Zaheer S, Pemberton J H, Farouk R et al.. Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum.  Ann Surg. 1998;  227 800-811
  • 27 Read T E, Ogunbiyi O A, Fleshman J W et al.. Neoadjuvant external beam radiation and proctectomy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 1778-1790
  • 28 Kockerling F, Scheidbach H, Schneider C et al.. Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: early postoperative results of a prospective study involving 116 patients. The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 1503-1511
  • 29 Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H et al.. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal carcinoma.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 1648-1654
  • 30 Kockerling F, Rose J, Schneider C et al.. Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis: risk of postoperative leakage. Results of a multicenter study. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG).  Surg Endosc. 1999;  13 639-644
  • 31 Huscher C, Silecchia G, Croce E et al.. Laparoscopic colorectal resection. A multicenter Italian study.  Surg Endosc. 1996;  10 875-879
  • 32 Fleshman J W, Wexner S D, Anvari M et al.. Laparoscopic vs. open abdominoperineal resection for cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 930-939
  • 33 Lord S A, Larach S W, Ferrara A et al.. Laparoscopic resections for colorectal carcinoma. A three-year experience.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 148-154
  • 34 Leung K L, Kwok S P, Lau W Y et al.. Laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma. Immediate and medium-term results.  Arch Surg. 1997;  132 761-764
  • 35 Patankar S K, Larach S W, Ferrara A et al.. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 601-611
  • 36 Morino M, Parini U, Giraudo G et al.. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients.  Ann Surg. 2003;  237 335-342
  • 37 Schiedeck T H, Schwandner O, Baca I et al.. Laparoscopic surgery for the cure of colorectal cancer: results of a German five-center study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 1-8
  • 38 Hartley J E, Mehigan B J, Qureshi A E et al.. Total mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 315-321
  • 39 Lezoche E, Feliciotti F, Paganini A M et al.. Results of laparoscopic versus open resections for non-early rectal cancer in patients with a minimum follow-up of four years.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;  49 1185-1190
  • 40 Poulin E C, Schlachta C M, Gregoire R et al.. Local recurrence and survival after laparoscopic mesorectal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 989-995
  • 41 Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Konradt J et al.. Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and anterior resection with curative intent for carcinoma of the rectum.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 7-13
  • 42 Anthuber M, Fuerst A, Elser F et al.. Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in 101 patients.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 1047-1053
  • 43 Koea J B, Guillem J G, Conlon K C et al.. Role of laparoscopy in the initial multimodality management of patients with near-obstructing rectal cancer.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;  4 105-108
  • 44 Morino M, Allaix M E, Giraudo G, Como F, Garrone C. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study.  Surg Endosc. 2005;  19 1460-1467
  • 45 Dulucq J L, Wintringer P, Stabilini C, Mahajna A. Laparoscopic resection with anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer: long-term outcome.  Surg Endosc. 2005;  19 1468-1474
  • 46 Quah H M, Jayne D G, Eu K W, Soew-Chen F. Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for rectal cancer.  Br J Surg. 2002;  89 1551-1556
  • 47 Jayne D G, Brown J M, Thorpe H et al.. Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique.  Br J Surg. 2005;  92 1124-1132

Thomas E ReadM.D. 

Department of Surgery 4600N

Western Pennsylvania Hospital, 4800 Friendship Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15224

Email: tread@wpahs.org

    >