Endoscopy 2006; 38(9): 902-906
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-944733
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

“Salvage” endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon using a retroflexion gastroscope dissection technique: a prospective analysis

D.  P.  Hurlstone1 , D.  S.  Sanders1 , M.  Thomson2 , S.  S.  Cross3
  • 1Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • 2Dept. of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • 3Academic Unit of Pathology, Section of Oncology and Pathology, Division of Genomic Medicine, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 5 March 2006

Accepted after revision 26 June 2006

Publication Date:
18 September 2006 (online)

Background and study aims: Endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection can provide curative endoscopic therapy for Paris type I/II adenomas and node-negative early cancer. No studies have addressed the technical feasibility of retroflexion endoscopic dissection methods for luminal “salvage” therapy in patients considered unresectable using conventional forward-viewing resection.
Patients and methods: Colonoscopy using an Olympus GIF-XQ240 gastroscope was carried out in 76 patients with Paris type I/II adenomas, early colorectal cancer (CRC), or laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) when the index endoscopist considered the lesion to be unresectable due to retrograde fold involvement. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and submucosal dissection were carried out using a complete retroflexion technique. Endoscopic and miniprobe 20-MHz or 12.5-MHz ultrasound follow-up data were collected prospectively up to 24 months after the index resection.
Results: Cecal intubation or cannulation to the neoterminal ileum was achieved in 76 (100 %) cases. Forty lesions (53 %) were classified in accordance with the Paris criteria as Is; 16 (21 %) as type II; 10 (13.5 %) as LST-G; and 10 (13.5 %) as LST-NG. Eight lesions (10 %) were excluded from EMR on the basis of endoscopic ultrasound criteria, with 68 of the 76 lesions (89 %) meeting the criteria for endoluminal resection. The median intubation time was 16 min (range 3 - 32 min). The median resection times were 98 min (range 30 - 242 min), 36 min (range 10 - 60 min), 172 min (range 20 - 240 min), and 60 min (range 10 - 116 min) for Paris Is, II, LST-G, and LST-NG lesions, respectively. LST-G morphology was associated with a high median submucosal injection volume in comparison with all other Paris types (P < 0.05) and with a prolonged resection time (P < 0.01). Sixty-one patients (94 %) completed the surveillance protocol. Higaki recurrence criteria were met in seven patients (11 %), with six undergoing successful adjunctive endoluminal resection. After 24 months of follow-up, the “cure” rate with endoscopic resection was 60 out of 61 (98 %).
Conclusions: This is the first prospective study to address the safety and medium-term efficacy of retroflexion endoscopic resection in the colon. When appropriate exclusion criteria are applied, selected patients can receive curative resection using the retroflexion technique. “Salvage” endoluminal therapy may therefore be possible in such cases when surgical resection would otherwise have been required.

References

  • 1 Rex D K, Khashab M. Colonoscopic polypectomy in retroflexion.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 144-148
  • 2 Paris Workshop Participants . The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach and colon.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  58 S3-S43
  • 3 Hurlstone D P, Fujii T. Practical uses of chromoendoscopy and magnification at colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2005;  15 687-702
  • 4 Hurlstone D P, Cross S S, Adam I. et al . A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the UK.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 2543-2549
  • 5 Tseng L J, Jao Y T, Mo L R. Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer with a balloon-sheathed miniprobe.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 564-568
  • 6 Cho E, Nakajima M, Yasuda K. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer invasion.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 521-527
  • 7 Hurlstone D P, Cross S S, Slater R. et al . Detecting diminutive colorectal lesions at colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial of pan-colonic versus targeted chromoscopy.  Gut. 2004;  53 376-380
  • 8 Hurlstone D P, Lobo A J. Resection margin “thermal tattooing” for lateral spreading tumour resection using endoscopic mucosal resection: a new technique for assisting complete horizontal clearance.  World J Surg. 2003;  in press
  • 9 Karita M, Tada M, Okita K, Kodama T. Endoscopic therapy for early colon cancer: the strip biopsy resection technique.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 128-132
  • 10 Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Nakamura M. et al . Successful outcomes of a novel endoscopic treatment for GI tumors: endoscopic submucosal dissection with a mixture of high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid, glycerin, and sugar.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 243-249
  • 11 Brooker J C, Saunders B P, Shah S G. et al . Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 371-375
  • 12 Fujishiro M, Ono H, Gotoda T. et al . Usefulness of Maalox for detection of the precise bleeding point position and confirmation of hemostasis on gastrointestinal hemorrhage.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 196
  • 13 Schlemper R J, Riddell R H, Kato Y. et al . The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal neoplasia.  Gut. 2000;  47 251-255
  • 14 Ponchon T. Endoscopic mucosal resection.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;  32 6-10
  • 15 Higaki S, Hashimoto S, Harada K. et al . Long-term follow-up of large flat colorectal tumors resected endoscopically.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 845-849
  • 16 Hurlstone D P, Sanders D S, Cross S S. et al . Colonoscopic resection of lateral spreading tumours: a prospective analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection.  Gut. 2004;  53 1334-1339
  • 17 Saito Y, Fujii T, Kondo H. et al . Endoscopic treatment for laterally spreading tumors in the colon.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 682-686
  • 18 Tanaka S, Haruma K, Oka S. et al . Clinicopathological features and endoscopic treatment of superficial spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 62-66
  • 19 Hurlstone D P, Sanders D S, Cross S S. et al . A prospective analysis of extended endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal villous adenomas: an alternative technique to transanal endoscopic microsurgery.  Colorectal Dis. 2005;  7 339-344
  • 20 Walsh R M, Ackroyd F W, Shellito P C. Endoscopic resection of large sessile colorectal polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 303-309
  • 21 Bedogni G, Bertoni G, Ricci E. et al . Colonoscopic excision of large and giant colorectal polyps: technical implications and results over eight years.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1986;  29 831-835
  • 22 Rex D K, Goodwine B W. Method of colonoscopy in 42 consecutive patients presenting after prior incomplete colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1148-1151

D. P. Hurlstone, M. D.

Room BD82 · B Floor, Endoscopy · Royal Hallamshire Hospital

Sheffield · South Yorkshire · United Kingdom

Fax: +44-114-2712692

Email: p.hurlstone@shef.ac.uk

    >