Endoscopy 2006; 38(12): 1218-1223
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-944787
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Characterization of colonic polyps at conventional (nonmagnifying) colonoscopy after spraying with 0.2 % indigo carmine dye

S.  Sonwalkar1 , O.  Rotimi2 , B.  J.  Rembacken1
  • 1Centre for Digestive Diseases, Department of Gastroenterology, General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Histopathology, General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 1 January 2006

Accepted after revision 14 July 2006

Publication Date:
11 December 2006 (online)

Background and study aims: Japanese endoscopists have devised a classification system based on mucosal crypt patterns which is helpful for distinguishing between hyperplastic polyps, adenomas, and invasive cancers at colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to assess how well the various types of colonic polyp could be distinguished using conventional colonoscopes after spraying with 0.2 % indigo carmine dye.
Patients and methods: The endoscopic appearances of all colonic lesions were assessed in 476 unselected patients using normal-resolution, nonmagnifying colonoscopes after spraying with 0.2 % indigo carmine dye.
Results: A total of 709 lesions were found in the 476 patients, and histology was available for 673 of these lesions: 187 lesions were found to be non-neoplastic (128 hyperplastic, 2 juvenile, 30 inflammatory, and 27 classified as ”others”); 467 lesions were adenomatous; and 19 lesions were carcinomas. Of the 467 adenomas, 377 were tubular, 77 were tubulovillous, 8 were villous and 5 were serrated; 423/467 were correctly identified (sensitivity 91 %). Of the 187 non-neoplastic lesions, 153 were correctly classified (specificity 82 %). A total of 343 of the 377 tubular lesions were correctly identified as tubular adenomas (sensitivity 90 %), and 46 of the 77 tubulovillous lesions were correctly identified.
Conclusions: Standard colonoscopy with dye spraying can be used to differentiate colonic polyps. Magnification is not always necessary to distinguish neoplastic from nonneoplastic colonic lesions. This finding could result in resource savings in colonoscopic screening.

References

  • 1 Correa P. Epidemiology of polyps and cancer in the human intestine.  Gastroenterology. 1979;  77 1244-1251
  • 2 Mitooka H, Fujimori T, Maeda S. et al . Colon polyp detected by contrast chromoscopy using indigo carmine dye capsule.  Dig Endosc. 1992;  4 340-354
  • 3 Gottlieb L S, Winawer S J, Sternberg S S. et al . National Polyp Study: the diminutive colonic polyp.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1984;  28 143
  • 4 Weston A P, Campbell D R. Diminutive colonic polyps: histopathology, spatial distribution, concomitant significant lesions and treatment complications.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;  90 24-28
  • 5 Estrada R G, Spjut H J. Hyperplastic polyps of the large bowel.  Am J Surg Pathol. 1980;  4 127-133
  • 6 Chapui P H, Dent O F, Goulston K J. Clinical accuracy in diagnosis of small polyps using the flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscope.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1982;  25 669-672
  • 7 Neale A V, Demers R Y, Budev H, Scott R O. Physician accuracy in diagnosing colorectal polyps.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;  30 247-250
  • 8 Arthur J F. Structure and significance of metaplastic nodules in rectal mucosa.  J Clin Pathol. 1968;  21 735-743
  • 9 Axelrad A M, Fleischer D E, Geller A J. et al . High-resolution chromoendoscopy for the diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps: implications for colon cancer screening.  Gastroenterology. 1996;  110 1253-1258
  • 10 Waye J D, Lewis B S, Frankel A, Geller S A. Small colon polyps.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1988;  83 120-122
  • 11 Tedesco F J, Hendrix J C, Pickens C A. et al . Diminutive polyps: histopathology, spatial distribution, and clinical significance.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1982;  28 1-5
  • 12 Tada M, Katoh S, Kohli Y, Kawai K. On the dye spraying method in colonofiberoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1976;  8 70-74
  • 13 Mitooka H, Shirakawa K, Naka Y. et al . Differentiation of diminutive neoplastic polyps from nonneoplastic polyps by the pit patterns observed by magnifying colonoscope [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 95
  • 14 George L L, Van Stolk R U, Brzezinski A, Seidner D L. Evaluation of indigo carmine dye spray as a diagnostic tool in assessing diminutive polyps found at screening sigmoidoscopy [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 93
  • 15 Fry S W, Fleischer D E, Axelrad A M. et al . High resolution chromo-endoscopy: an affordable and accurate non-biopsy technique for predicting histology of colorectal polyps [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 365
  • 16 Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T. et al . Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 8-14
  • 17 Kato S, Fujii T, Koba I. et al . Assessment of colorectal lesions using magnifying colonoscopy and mucosal dye spraying: can significant lesions be distinguished?.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 306-310
  • 18 Jaramillo E, Watanabe M, Slezak P, Rubio C. Flat neoplastic lesions of the colon and rectum detected by high-resolution video endoscopy and chromoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 114-122
  • 19 The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions . Esophagus, stomach, and colon.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 S3-S43
  • 20 Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T. et al . Colorectal tumors and pit pattern.  J Clin Pathol. 1994;  47 880-885
  • 21 Schlemper R J, Riddell R H, Kato Y. et al . Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.  Gut. 2000;  47 251-255
  • 22 Kim C Y, Fleischer D E. Colonic chromoscopy: a new perspective on polyps and flat adenomas.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1997;  7 423-437
  • 23 Fennerty M B. Tissue staining.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1994;  4 297-311
  • 24 Tada M, Misaki F, Kawai K. A new approach to the observation of minute changes of the colonic mucosa by means of magnifying colonoscope, type CF-MB-M (Olympus).  Gastrointest Endosc. 1978;  24 146-147
  • 25 Tung S Y, Wu C S, Su M Y. Magnifying colonoscopy for differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic lesions.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  9 2628-2632
  • 26 Togashi K, Konishi F, Ishizuka T. et al . Efficacy of magnifying endoscopy in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps of the large bowel.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  12 1602-1608
  • 27 Konishi K, Kaneko K, Kurahashi T. et al . A comparison of magnifying and non-magnifying colonoscopy for diagnosis of colorectal polyps: a prospective study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 48-53
  • 28 Kiesslich R, Fritsch J, Holtmann M. et al . Methylene-blue aided chromoendoscopy for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia and colon cancer in ulcerative colitis.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  124 880-888
  • 29 Hurlstone D P, Cross S S, Adam I. et al . Efficacy of high magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy for the diagnosis of neoplasia in flat and depressed lesions of the colorectum: a prospective analysis.  Gut. 2004;  53 284-290
  • 30 Bowles C J, Leicester R, Romaya C. et al . A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?.  Gut. 2004;  53 277-283
  • 31 Eisen G M, Kim C Y, Fleischer D E. et al . High-resolution chromoendoscopy for classifying colonic polyps: a multicenter study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 687-694

B. J. Rembacken, M.D.

Centre for Digestive Diseases

The General Infirmary at Leeds · Great George Street · Leeds LS1 3EX · United Kingdom

Fax: +44-113-3928767

Email: bjr@firstnet.co.uk

    >