Primary precutting versus conventional over-the-wire sphincterotomy for bile duct access: a prospective randomized study

Background and study aims: Precut is a well-known technique that is used if repeated attempts at common bile duct (CBD) cannulation fail. Opinions on the complication rate of precut are conflicting, however. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and complication rate of precut used as a primary method of CBD access with the efficacy and safety of the conventional technique.
Patients and methods: During the 19-month study period, consecutive patients who were scheduled for first-time endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) for a variety of biliary disorders were randomized into two groups: patients in group A underwent conventional wire-guided biliary cannulation followed by ES (with precut being performed only when this failed); in patients in group B precut was used as a primary technique to gain biliary access, followed by wire-guided ES. We used a specially designed, modified Erlangen type of sphincterotome for precutting.
Results: A total of 291 patients (100 men, 191 women; mean ± SD age 65 ± 17.5 years) were recruited: 146 patients were assigned to group A (conventional approach) and 145 to group B (primary precut approach). The indications for ES were comparable in the two groups. In group A, wire-guided cannulation of the CBD failed in 42 patients. Secondary precut was successful in 41 of these patients, leading to an overall success rate of 99.3 %. In group B, the ES success rate using primary precut was 100 % at the first attempt. The mean time to successful deep CBD cannulation was 8.3 ± 2.1 minutes in group A and 6.9 ± 1.8 minutes in group B (P < 0.001). The incidence of mild to moderate pancreatitis was similar in the two groups (2.9 % in group A vs. 2.1 % in group B, P > 0.05). Mild bleeding occurred in only one patient (from group A) and this was controlled by epinephrine injection. None of the study patients developed severe pancreatitis or perforation.
Conclusions: In experienced hands, an approach using primary precut appears to be at least as successful and safe as a conventional approach using guide-wire-based CBD cannulation followed by ES, and might also be a quicker method.

References

• 1 Larkin C J, Huibregtse K. Precut sphincterotomy: indications, pitfalls, and complications.  Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2001;  3 147-153
• 2 Shakoor T, Geenen J E. Pre-cut papillotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 623-627
• 3 Cotton P B. Precut papillotomy: a risky technique for experts only.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;  35 578-579
• 4 Baillie J. Needle-knife papillotomy revisited.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  46 282-284
• 5 Binmoeller K F, Seifert H, Gerke H. et al . Papillary roof incision using the Erlangen-type precut papillotome to achieve selective bile duct cannulation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 689-695
• 6 Cotton P B, Lehman G, Vennes J. et al . Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 383-393
• 7 Harewood G C, Baron T H. An assessment of the learning curve for precut biliary sphincterotomy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1708-1712
• 8 Osnes M, Kahrs T. Endoscopic choledochoduodenostomy for choledocholithiasis through choledochoduodenal fistula.  Endoscopy. 1977;  9 162-165
• 9 Siegel J H. Precut papillotomy: a method to improve success of ERCP and papillotomy.  Endoscopy. 1980;  12 130-133
• 10 Caletti G C, Verucchi G, Bolondi L. et al . Diathermy ERCP: an alternative method for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in jaundiced patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1980;  26 13-15
• 11 Kozarek R A, Sanowski R A. Endoscopic choledochoduodenostomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1983;  29 119-121
• 12 Schapira L, Khawaja F I. Endoscopic fistulo-sphincterotomy: an alternative method of sphincterotomy using a new sphincterotome.  Endoscopy. 1982;  14 58-60
• 13 Huibregtse K, Katon R M, Tytgat G NJ. Pre-cut papillotomy via fine-needle knife papillotome: a safe and effective technique.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1986;  32 403-405
• 14 Bruins Slot W, Schoeman M N, Disario J A. et al . Needle-knife sphincterotomy as a precut procedure: a retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications.  Endoscopy. 1996;  28 334-339
• 15 Dowsett J F, Polydorou A A, Varia D. et al . Needle knife papillotomy: how safe and how effective?.  Gut. 1990;  31 905-908
• 16 Leung J W, Banez V P, Chung S C. Precut (needle knife) papillotomy for impacted common bile duct stone at the ampulla.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;  85 991-993
• 17 Tweedle D E, Martin D F. Needle knife papillotomy for endoscopic sphincterotomy and cholangiography.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 518-521
• 18 Sriram P VJ, Rao G V, Reddy D N. The precut - when, where and how? A review.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 524-530
• 19 Abu-Hamda E M, Baron T H, Simmons D T. et al . A retrospective comparison of outcomes using three different precut needle knife techniques for biliary cannulation.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;  39 717-721
• 20 Mavrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Romanos A. et al . Needle-knife fistulotomy versus needle-knife precut papillotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 334-339
• 21 Kasmin F E, Cohen D, Batra S. et al . Needle-knife sphincterotomy in a tertiary referral center: efficacy and complications.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 48-53
• 22 Artifon E L, Hondo F Y, Sakai P. et al . A new approach to the bile duct via needle puncture of the papillary roof.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 1158
• 23 Park S H, Kim H J, Park D H. et al . Pre-cut papillotomy with a new papillotome.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 588-591
• 24 Uchida N, Tsutsui K, Kamada H. et al . Pre-cutting using a noseless papillotome with independent lumens for contrast material and guidewire.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  20 947-950
• 25 Rollhauser C, Johnson M, Al-Kawas F H. Needle knife papillotomy: a helpful and safe adjunct to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a selected population.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 691-696
• 26 Dhir V, Mallath M K. Is pre-cut papillotomy guilty as accused?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 143-144
• 27 Vandervoort J, Carr-Locke D L. Needle-knife access papillotomy: an unfairly maligned technique?.  Endoscopy. 1996;  28 365-366