References and Notes
<A NAME="RD09506ST-1">1</A>
IICT communication No. 060622. Part 80 in the series ‘Studies on Novel Synthetic Methodologies’.
<A NAME="RD09506ST-2">2</A>
Rossi R.
Carpita A.
Cossi P.
Tetrahedron
1992,
48:
8801
<A NAME="RD09506ST-3">3</A>
Jarvis AP.
Leibig J.
Holldobler B.
Oldham NJ.
Chem. Commun.
2004,
1196
<A NAME="RD09506ST-4A">4a</A>
Katzenellenbogen JA.
Utawanit T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1974,
96:
6153
<A NAME="RD09506ST-4B">4b</A>
Kocienski PJ.
Ansell JN.
Ostrow RW.
J. Org. Chem.
1976,
41:
3625
<A NAME="RD09506ST-5A">5a</A>
Martischonok V.
Melikyan GG.
Mineif A.
Vostrowsky O.
Bestmann HJ.
Synthesis
1991,
560
<A NAME="RD09506ST-5B">5b</A>
De Kimpe N.
Aelterman W.
Tetrahedron
1996,
52:
12815
<A NAME="RD09506ST-6">6</A>
Blum MS.
Chemical Defenses of Arthropods
Academic Press;
New York:
1981.
p.138
<A NAME="RD09506ST-7">7</A>
Fales HM.
Blum MS.
Crewe RM.
Brand JM.
J. Insect Physiol.
1972,
18:
1077
<A NAME="RD09506ST-8A">8a</A>
Bestmann HJ.
Attygalle AB.
Glasbrenner J.
Riemer R.
Vostrowsky O.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1987,
26:
784
<A NAME="RD09506ST-8B">8b</A>
Bestmann HJ.
Attygalle AB.
Glasbrenner J.
Riemer R.
Vostrowsky O.
Constantino MG.
Melikyan G.
Morgan ED.
Liebigs Ann. Chem.
1988,
55
<A NAME="RD09506ST-9A">9a</A>
Baylis AB, and
Hillman MED. inventors; German Patent 2155113.
; Chem. Abstr. 1972, 77, 34174q
<A NAME="RD09506ST-9B">9b</A>
Basavaiah D.
Rao AJ.
Satyanarayana T.
Chem. Rev.
2003,
103:
811 ; and references cited therein
<A NAME="RD09506ST-10A">10a</A>
Das B.
Banerjee J.
Ravindranath N.
Venkataiah B.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2004,
45:
2425
<A NAME="RD09506ST-10B">10b</A>
Das B.
Banerjee J.
Ravindranath N.
Tetrahedron
2004,
60:
8357
<A NAME="RD09506ST-11A">11a</A>
Das B.
Banerjee J.
Mahender G.
Majhi A.
Org. Lett.
2004,
6:
3349
<A NAME="RD09506ST-11B">11b</A>
Das B.
Mahender G.
Chowdhury N.
Banerjee J.
Synlett
2005,
1000
<A NAME="RD09506ST-11C">11c</A>
Das B.
Banerjee J.
Majhi A.
Mahender G.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2004,
45:
9225
<A NAME="RD09506ST-12">12</A>
Das B.
Majhi A.
Banerjee J.
Chowdhury N.
Venkateswarlu K.
Chem. Lett.
2005,
34:
1492
<A NAME="RD09506ST-13">13</A>
Drewes SE.
Emslie ND.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1982,
2089
<A NAME="RD09506ST-14A">14a</A>
Jenn T.
Heissler D.
Tetrahedron
1998,
54:
97
<A NAME="RD09506ST-14B">14b</A>
Grassi D.
Lippuner V.
Aebi M.
Brunner J.
Vasella A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997,
119:
10992
<A NAME="RD09506ST-14C">14c</A>
Hoffmann HMR.
Rabe J.
J. Org. Chem.
1985,
50:
3849
<A NAME="RD09506ST-15">15</A>
Roush WR.
Brown BB.
J. Org. Chem.
1993,
58:
2151
<A NAME="RD09506ST-16A">16a</A>
Das B.
Chowdhury N.
Banerjee J.
Majhi A.
Mahender G.
Chem. Lett.
2006,
35:
358
<A NAME="RD09506ST-16B">16b</A>
Mateus CR.
Feltrin MP.
Costa AM.
Cohello F.
Almedia WP.
Tetrahedron
2001,
57:
6901
<A NAME="RD09506ST-16C">16c</A>
Basavaiah D.
Hyma RS.
Tetrahedron
1996,
52:
1253
<A NAME="RD09506ST-16D">16d</A>
Fernandes L.
Bortoluzzi AJ.
Sa’ MM.
Tetrahedron
2004,
60:
9983
<A NAME="RD09506ST-17A">17a</A>
Shadakshari U.
Nayak SK.
Tetrahedron
2001,
57:
4599
<A NAME="RD09506ST-17B">17b</A>
Li J.
Qian W.
Zhang Y.
Tetrahedron
2004,
60:
5793
<A NAME="RD09506ST-18">18</A>
Basavaiah D.
Krishnamacharyulu M.
Hyma RS.
Sarma PKS.
Kumaragurabaran N.
J. Org. Chem.
1999,
64:
1197
<A NAME="RD09506ST-19">19</A>
Pachamuthu K.
Vankar YD.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1998,
39:
5439
<A NAME="RD09506ST-20">20</A>
Patra A.
Batra S.
Bhaduri AP.
Synlett
2003,
1611
<A NAME="RD09506ST-21">21</A>
Ranu BC.
Samanta S.
J. Org. Chem.
2003,
68:
7130
<A NAME="RD09506ST-22">22</A>
Yanagisawa A.
Goudu R.
Arai T.
Org. Lett.
2004,
6:
4281
<A NAME="RD09506ST-23">23</A>
General Procedure for the Reduction of Adducts.
To a stirred solution of InCl3 (90 mg, 0.4 mmol) and NaBH4 (168 mg, 4.5 mmol) in dry MeCN (10 mL) was added a solution of Baylis-Hillman adduct
1 (3 mmol) in MeCN (4 mL) at r.t. under nitrogen atmosphere. Stirring was continued
and the reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion (3-3.5 h), the reaction mixture
was quenched with Et2O (25 mL). After the mixture settled, the supernatant organic layer was decanted and
the residual semi-solid mass (inorganic part) was further extracted with Et2O. The combined ether extract was washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated to obtain the crude product, which was purified by column chromatography
over silica gel to furnish the pure E-alkenone 2. The spectral (IR, 1H NMR and 13C NMR and MS) data of some repesentative adducts and E-alkenones are given bellow.
Compound 1d: IR (KBr): 3474, 1707, 1678, 1442, 1032 cm-1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.61 (1 H, dd, J = 8.0, 2.0 Hz), 7.38-7.17 (3 H, m), 6.12 (1 H, s), 5.94 (1 H, d, J = 3.5 Hz), 5.56 (1 H, s), 3.48 (1 H, d, J = 3.5 Hz), 2.75 (2 H, q, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.11 (3 H, t, J = 7.0 Hz). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 203.1, 150.0, 141.8, 128.5, 127.5, 126.8, 125.0, 72.7, 32.0, 8.2. LSIMS (FAB):
m/z = 249, 247 [M+ + Na].
Compound 1g: syn:anti = 70:30. IR (KBr): 3418, 1708, 1682, 1463, 1379 cm-1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ
(syn) = 6.10 (1 H, s), 5.91 (1 H, s), 4.31 (1 H, t, J = 5.5 Hz), 2.78-2.65 (3 H, m), 1.77-1.52 (3 H, m), 1.12 (3 H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 0.90 (3 H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 0.82 (3 H, d, J = 7.0 Hz); δ (anti) = 6.08 (1 H, s), 5.87 (1 H, s), 4.05 (1 H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.78-2.65 (1 H, merged with the signals for anti), 2.38 (2 H, q, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.49-1.33 (3 H, m), 1.12 (3 H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 0.90 (3 H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 0.78 (3 H, d, J = 7.0 Hz). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ (syn) = 202.8, 149.8, 124.7, 75.1, 39.4, 32.0, 26.8, 13.0, 12.1, 8.1; δ (anti) = 203.7, 149.0, 125.0, 77.4, 39.8, 32.0, 24.9, 16.3, 11.9, 8.1. LSIMS (FAB): m/z = 193 [M+ + Na].
Compound 1h: syn:anti = 60:40, IR (KBr): 3418, 1714, 1675, 1460, 1367 cm-1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ
(syn) = 6.12 (1 H, s), 5.97 (1 H, s), 4.32 (1 H, d, J = 5.5 Hz), 2.36 (3 H, s), 2.19 (1 H, d, J = 3.5 Hz), 1.72-1.54 (2 H, m), 1.22-1.16 (1 H, m), 0.99-0.87 (6 H, m); δ (anti) = 6.11 (1 H, s), 5.92 (1 H, s), 4.08 (1 H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.36 (3 H, s), 2.19 (1 H, br s), 1.46-1.32 (2 H, m), 1.18-1.07 (1 H, m),
0.85-0.77 (6 H, m). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ (syn) = 201.0, 150.0, 126.0, 75.1, 39.2, 30.0, 26.9, 14.0, 12.2; δ (anti) = 201.4, 149.8, 126.5, 77.5, 39.8, 30.0, 25.0, 16.5, 12.0. LSIMS (FAB): m/z = 179 [M+ + Na].
Compound 2b: IR (KBr): 1718, 1672, 1462, 1373, 1219 cm-1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.36 (1 H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.70 (1 H, m), 2.68 (2 H, q, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.78 (3 H, s), 1.10-1.02 (9 H, m) Hz). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 202.5, 148.8, 134.7, 30.2, 28.6, 22.4, 11.6, 8.9. LSI-MS (FAB): m/z = 163 [M+ + Na].
Compound 2d: IR (KBr): 1718, 1675, 1630, 1468, 1438, 1363 cm-1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.59 (1 H, s), 7.42 (1 H, m), 7.36-7.27 (3 H, m), 2.85 (2 H, q, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.92 (3 H, s), 1.19 (3 H, t, J = 7.0 Hz). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 202.6, 137.8, 135.6, 134.98, 134.92, 130.5, 129.9, 128.2, 126.6, 30.1, 13.8,
8.7. LSIMS (FAB): m/z = 209 [M+ + 1], 211.
<A NAME="RD09506ST-24">24</A>
Radhakrishna P.
Manjuvani A.
Rajaskhar E.
ARKIVOC
2005,
(iii):
99